<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[This was on The Gadget Show (UK) recently; at higher quality the FPS drops but the lower quality seems OK for a webcam.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Butler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 21st 2009 7:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's the point of stereo mics when they're so close together?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheBrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 21st 2009 7:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[whats the point in stereo mics unless you're making music or a tv show?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greggoo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 21st 2009 7:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[what the point in...ccccccc combo breaker.<br><br>figured I would head it off at the pass.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 21st 2009 7:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[whats the point of heading it off at the pass?<br>the combo is not broken anyway, since joseph also began with whats the point]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RioRyan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 21st 2009 7:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[in that case.... C-C-C-C-C-C-COMMMBO BREAKER!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greggoo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 21st 2009 8:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[What he said]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 21st 2009 7:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[2MP is not going to get you good quality, wtf is Engadget thinking?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Techie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 21st 2009 7:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have the previous model. Excellent quality on Justin.tv]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[troy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 21st 2009 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[whats the point of 90fps ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major4Play]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 21st 2009 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[whats the point of asking the point of 90fps ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SalmonStereo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 21st 2009 9:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bought this and was so disappointed with the awful software that came with it.  I returned it and bought a logitech 2MP webcam and been very happy since.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 21st 2009 8:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[Logitech Quickcam Pro 9000.  2.0MP and $60.  I've had one for a bit over a year and the video quality on it is superb!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ebayaholic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 21st 2009 9:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because more megapixels is always the answer, as opposed to sensors or optics, right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 22nd 2009 12:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips SPC1330NC webcam reviewed: high quality but not exactly high speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/philips-spc1330nc-webcam-reviewed-high-quality-but-not-exactly/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it can do 720p30 then it's HD, if it cant it's not. Couldn't tell if the review actually answered that. Also the reviewer is one ugly individual. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[s.e.j.ramsay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 22nd 2009 3:43AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
