<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[looks like the Sony Vaio X505zp]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[naz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 7:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[yes it does!  cant believe u remember the model number! ahha]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darkstar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 7:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's what I was thinking too. Although, you can't really compare this with the Air or Adamo as this device is more like a netbook than whatever you call the offerings from Apple and Dell.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bootareen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 10:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[i dont know who really cared about thinness. all i ever cared was the weight/screen size. for a 10incher, this aint bad at 1.5 lbs]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darkstar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 7:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe - but what is it made of?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RattyUK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 7:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry Vista, but I've moved on... Wait till July next year, maybe then. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cunthor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 7:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oops, not the SP1 post after all. Grrr, where is the edit/preview button, eh Engadget?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cunthor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 7:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[you really should apologise. However, July next year you will be happier using Windows 7]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darkmax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 7:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[If its Atom powered, compare it to other netbooks, not ultra-portable. Both Air and Adamo have better cpu than Atom.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Boards of Canada]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 7:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with you on this one... mind you the lines are beginning to blur more and more between the different classifications. I suppose so long as there is a relatively harsh difference in processor and grfx chipsets there will be reason for distinction... However I would not be surprised if in the relatively near future there is a complete gradient of screensizes, weights, and performance cababilities at relevant pricing.<br><br>On a side note, thumbs up for Boards of Canada, nice band]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[benhc911]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 2:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thicker but lighter than air?<br><br>That's...what, Nitrogen?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 7:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is (almost) it ! i´ve been waiting for a netbook wich design would appeal to me, sony vaio p was close but for me the pefection would be a sony vaip p in a 10 " screen (talking about netbooks) , so i see this is under sony influence (the design). i know i will wait for something like this or a sony vaio p with a 10" !]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[data]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 8:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[Would buy in black.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 8:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thin and light it may be, but geez it's been hit with the ugly stick...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 8:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[God damn thats ugly.<br><br>And its not an ultrathin notebook, they have *real* processors.<br><br>This is a netbook, 10" screen, atom processor, 3 usb slots, ethernet and a card reader. Its a netbook.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adderz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 8:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow. $1850 for a fractionally lighter netbook, which it likely achieves by being made out of recycled cardboard. And 1GB RAM (not expandable) for Vista? And no trackpad? <br><br>I think they're onto a winner here!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fnuky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[For $1600 you can get a new Panasonic R8. Just a tiny bit bulkier and heavier, and you get real notebook guts. Not really seeing the attraction of this netbook...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pyrthas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 2:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm, not sure why that ended up as a reply. I thought I undid that. Oh well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pyrthas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 2:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[It looks bizarre ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oli D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 10:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[It may look odd, but the specs are pretty awesome.<br>Admittedly, it has pretty much the same processor as every netbook, but a decent resolution 10.6" screen in a 765 gram machine is pretty impressive, definitely UMPC territory. The only comparable product really is the Vaio P, and from where I'm standing, this seem like a much more attractive proposition.<br>Shame the keyboard is in kinda the wrong place, but maybe there is a good reason for that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfticket]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 11:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[If there's going to be all that extra space, there's no point in making it similar to the Vaio P, especially when it doesn't have a chiclet keyboard which gives the vaio p a nice look.  It clearly has space for a trackpad and mouse buttons :\<br><br>But anyway, the Vaio P looks like it can fit a slightly larger screen in the top lid if they removed more of the bezel; it could be at least 9" instead of 8." It'd make that high res screen more bearable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rodney.ha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2009 11:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's VersaPro UltraLite Type VS is thicker but lighter than Air]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/necs-versapro-ultralite-type-vs-is-thicker-but-lighter-than-air/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really like the design of this personally, but I don't see it being a big seller as it will be so pricey.  This makes me think netbooks are finally going to evolve into something I'd purchase though.  The reason the keyboard is placed there is because if they shifted it higher on the unit it would make the unit thicker because they'd have to place it overtop of the motherboard area.  You can see this well in the side shots.   <br><br>If this were $600 or maybe even $700, I'd buy it.  For that price, I'd rather have a Mac Air... As sad as that is.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Meikat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 23rd 2009 11:16AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
