<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe they'll make a logo which looks a little bit more at home in 2009 to go with it...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bdav]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[I know its a little juvenile, but I can't help but think that the first "A" looks like it has a wiener. <br><br>Just Sayin']]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[someguy7234]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 1:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seek help]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Why should I have all the fun?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2009 8:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[damn! do want!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TRS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 1:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[Worst logo ever.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 1:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[So will we soon start seeing some SSD with this standard. I wonder how this will compete with the PCI-X drives.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[krische]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does anything even get close to saturating sataII yet??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tristan King]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[do you follow developments in the Solid State drive world? Single drives aren't there yet, but a RAID setup will saturate SATA 2. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 1:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nope, not even close.  The fastest SATA drives I know of are just getting to the 1Gbps rate.  However if you use 5x SATA port multipliers you end up saturating the single 3Gbps channel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SuperQ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 1:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Jacob <br>Didn't know you could put raid through a single sata channel, Lol<br><br>@ SuperQ<br>Who would bother using a multiplier instead of a raid card??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tristan King]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 11:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SuperQ<br><br>Not even close? New MLC SSDs from OCZ, Intel, and Corsair are already hitting over 200MB/sec read speeds, and their burst speed from cache already easily saturates SATA/300. You can expect this speed march to continue, particularly with models that use Internal RAID0. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2009 6:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now, if only 802.11n was the same way in getting from draft to final version as well...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[octoberasian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 1:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[Eh, using 802.11n Draft 2.0 to check Gmail Beta on Win 7 RC is just fine.  And that's final...<br><br>...OR IS IT?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian Martin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 2:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought the Power over SATA spec was coming along with revision 3.0?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[beq]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 2:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh btw, the proper name for it will be SATA 6Gbps, not SATA 3.0. This is to avoid confusion with the 3Gbps SATA 2.0 standard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[r3loaded]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 2:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish Apple would embrace the eSATA standard so I could expand my RAID options.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phlavor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 2:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm sorry dave, I'm afraid Apple can't do that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TRS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 3:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[The logo is too ugly for them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 4:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bravo TRS, I don't think anyone else got that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter F]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 6:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[i duno whats the big deal with the logo...i kinda like it. looks retro, kinda 90's...those were the good ol' days :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TRS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 2:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[90s is already retro? Damn, I'm getting very old.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crsh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[haha well im pushin 20 so for me 90's is retro :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TRS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 3:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[they should start making revisions for IDE to go that fast.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darok3k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2009 3:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SATA Revision 3.0 specification completed and released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/sata-revision-3-0-specification-completed-and-released/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, with this revision finally completed.........I think we can say that probably in the 2nd quarter of 2010, we'll we looking at nice motherboards.........you se usb 3.0 and sata 3.0.......more speed and higher transfer rates.............nice.....!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Franklin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2009 1:22PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
