<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oooh, sexy.<br><br>Man, I don't even need a device wrapped around the chipset, just stick that thing on a keyring and let me carry it around.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 1:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[iKurt5D is a dirty towel head]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m3tric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 10:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[linux linux linux?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Linhares]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 1:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[Computex, you mean.<br><br>Also, I think it's running some form of linux.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 1:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[Comptux? Some kind of KIRF Computex that's made in Chi-<br>... wait a minute...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[drill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 1:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[Im sorry but they look so stupid >.> I hated how the sony P's looked and these are just copies of it. Who wants a tiny screen thats a foot long >.>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 2:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[I do.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 10:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, like there are SO many fucking devices in the U.S. that have been and are avaliable on this platfo- WAIT, no, there are none. What a joke. Vaporware. I mean, the iPhone is running five year old hardware STILL....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 3:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[1GHZ on a phone is too much<br><br>if they can do 1.3 with -%30 they can probably do 800mhz with -%70 power. 2010 will be an intresting year for phones and WM devices since they seem to need more hardware with their Wvga resolutions]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sami ali]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 2:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[And 640K ought to be enough for everybody.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 6:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[DO WANT]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[digitallysick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 2:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where the hell is Tegra? Atom Silverthorne?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 2:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[Will HTC pay for the video drivers when they use it in their phones now or what?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RicoRich196]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 3:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[1.3Ghz Cortex? Sweet... T.I.'s revised OMAP3 chips -- the 36xx seres -- also are 45nm  and the highest end one is the OMAP3640 which has an ARM cortex-A8 core running at 1000 Mhz.<br><br>Remember, these new cores based on the ARM Cortex-A8 are roughly twice as fast as ARM11 cores per clock. So even a relatively slow Cortex chip running @ 600mhz has roughly the same performance as an ARM11 core running at 1200 Mhz.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 6:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually Snapdragon isn't a Cortex... it uses the same instruction set (V7) but it's Qualcomm's own design... and it's supposed to be even faster per clock than the Cortex A8!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fnuky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 6:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hopefully these will be powering the (sic) Touch Pro 3... or TP3 for short...  (of course anyone hearing you talk about the TP3 will probably think you are referring to how many sheets of toilet paper... nevermind.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 4:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[I want a touch pro 2 soo bad.. but I also want a phone thats powered by one of these babies..<br>What do I dooo!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lazarpandar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 2nd 2009 3:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm's 1.3GHz QSD8650A Snapdragon chipset is 30% stronger,  uses 30% less power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/qualcomms-1-3ghz-qsd8650a-snapdragon-chipset-is-30-stronger/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks nice.  Would I buy? only $200/$250 or less...<br><br>Stick that in an enclosure housing a 1TB hard drive with xbmc/boxee on running instead of android and we're REALLY talking business.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2009 5:17PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
