<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Fujitsu's vibrant M2010 netbook gets reviewed: "too little, too late"</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Fujitsu's vibrant M2010 netbook gets reviewed: "too little, too late"</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu's vibrant M2010 netbook gets reviewed: "too little, too late"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</guid><description><![CDATA[I want a MacBook Tablet!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[a13xx94]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu's vibrant M2010 netbook gets reviewed: "too little, too late"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</guid><description><![CDATA[People in hell want a glass of ice water, but do they get it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stymie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu's vibrant M2010 netbook gets reviewed: "too little, too late"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</guid><description><![CDATA[Of course not! They get MacBook Tablets instead. We get ice water. It's not fair, is it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dafrety]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 10:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu's vibrant M2010 netbook gets reviewed: "too little, too late"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</guid><description><![CDATA[Red IS my color, but fortunately I am wise in the ways of spray paint and laptop disassembly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ignofibininious]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu's vibrant M2010 netbook gets reviewed: "too little, too late"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</guid><description><![CDATA[2 hours?!?!?!?! Christ, I get like 8.5-9 on my Eee PC 1000HE. Hell even with it in the Super performance mode that overclocks the processor I still get around 7 or 8.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu's vibrant M2010 netbook gets reviewed: "too little, too late"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe they were claiming 2 hours with WiFi switched on and LCD brightness turned up to the max. Then 2 hours is a good figure.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelvinyam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 11:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu's vibrant M2010 netbook gets reviewed: "too little, too late"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</guid><description><![CDATA[All the basic netbooks consume the same amount of power, battery life is just a matter of battery size, and, e.g. how bright the monitor is at the default setting. The much lower than average score for the same battery size suggests the machine wasn't set up properly, or the test wasn't consistent.<br><br>I had a look at the Fujitsu a couple of weeks ago. It's really sweet on the build quality and design fronts. I liked it. Price considerations aside, it's not bad machine.<br><br>You can put positive or negative spins on these netbook reviews based solely on what you ate that morning for breakfast. It not saying it was biased exactly, just that there is a lot of hair splitting going between 3 star vs 5 star ratings for what amounts to 99% the same machine.<br><br>And another thing, 576 vertical is an insignificant difference to 600 in the real world, I've used both I should know. For the video playback alone I'd pick 576 over the extra 24 pixels any day.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bebop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 8:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu's vibrant M2010 netbook gets reviewed: "too little, too late"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is this actually their entry to the market?  I thought that amilo mini or whatever was.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NWIFSER]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 9:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu's vibrant M2010 netbook gets reviewed: "too little, too late"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess the only way to share the cake effectively is to release netbook with touch screen. You may not need that feature, but I'm sure the reviewers would be impressed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelvinyam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 11:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu's vibrant M2010 netbook gets reviewed: "too little, too late"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/fujitsus-vibrant-m2010-netbook-gets-reviewed-too-little-too/</guid><description><![CDATA[Awesome look and affordable price . Will this come with Windows 7 ? and in how many color they have ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTech]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 12:03AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
