<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Extra! Extra! Faster processors make computers faster!  Read all about i!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[+1]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GRAMMAR POLICE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[haha this is crazy.  How much bigger is 2.13 than 2? about 5 percent maybe? great tests macworld, you are a gentleman and a scholar]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 9:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[HA!!! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lando06]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 8:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Brilliant!  And so right on.  Looks like Engadget is riding Jobs' pommel horse once again.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m3tric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 8:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow engadget readers never fail to post what I want to say before I can say it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aznofazns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 10:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Faster processors may make computers faster, but I wonder if slower processors make computers slower?...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LondonConsultant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 3:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, when I read that I was like "No fuck a 2.13 GHz will outperform a 2.0 GHz."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Patriks7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 3:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[So any daddy's rich schoolgirl with the regular macbook has a more powerful computer than a "I study graphics so [u]i need to[/u] buy a macbook pro" douche?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[musback]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 14th 2009 3:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[2.13 ghz cpu were found 5% faster than 2GHZ cpu? holy cow engadget,,,<br><br>THE SKY IS BLUE,THE GRASS IS GREEN OMG]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR House]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[still doesnt overtake the usability of the unibody.  glass trackpad and solid construction are not worth the extra .05%  Glad i dont need fw on my unibody, but the unibody case is better than my MBP in terms of solidity.  makes a huge difference when you hold it with 1 hand and there is no flex.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have the 2.0 GHz white MacBook, and the touchpad is flush with the palmrest and I always brush the pad while typing. I wish I'd bought one of the unibody ones with the recessed touchpad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FRiC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 8:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[umm.....<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megahertz_myth" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megahertz_myth</a><br>...ouch]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Moulton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 9:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[News flash to casual tech blogs and people who actually believe Apple's hype: DDR3 memory doesn't do anything for real world performance.<br><br>Unless you're dealing with Core i7 architecture and some pretty niche applications/benchmarks...But these are MacBooks we're talking about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amrosorma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[shittttt for $999 you could be dealing with core i7 architecture!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[patriotsn1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[nehalem mobile cpus aren't even out yet... what's the point of comparing desktop pricing to laptop? it's a bit like comparing a ferrari to rolls-royce... so ferrari's cheaper and faster, so it rules??? jerk off!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[b]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would like to argue it's more like comparing a house boat to an apartment...but still, valid point]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Moulton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[@b<br><br>Yeah right Ferrari's are cheaper than Rolls Royce's.<br><br>-_-]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xValentine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a motherboard that takes either DDR2 or DDR3 memories. Been waiting for the DDR3 to come to a price and performance point that it would make sence to switch to DDR3.<br><br>But as the performance gain from DDR2 is miniscule I haven't done it yet. DDR3 is a disappointment, and no reasobn to select one machine instead of another.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Newone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 8:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[DDR3 may or may not depending on what you are doing.  1066 vs. 800, however, definitely does.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CraigJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 10:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xValentine<br><br>Ferraris are much cheaper than Rolls Royces, it works out at about £100,000 cheaper infact.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob47]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 5:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Haha, why is "standard keyboard" on the list of features?  Did they really run out of more significant things to list?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[patriotsn1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think the two main reasons are business reasons (I don't really understand or believe in this at all, but think of how Apple charges $10 for new iPod touch "features"), as well as regional regions (U.S. keyboard vs. U.K keyboard, etc).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[its a standard keyboard because the Unibody 2.4 is backlit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alexisawesomex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think they're referring to different keyboard formats. In Canada it's common to see "Standard US English" as well as "Canadian Multilingual Standard". Big difference because I can't stand the multilingual keyboard when typing in English, so it is important that they list it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike P.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[there are core i7 laptops <br><br><a href="http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=171297&action=customize" rel="nofollow">http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=171297&action=customize</a>       and there still cheaper thrna 17 in mac pro  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[YOYO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Albeit, those laptops you mentioned have enough battery power to only keep the sleep light on, they are almost as powerful as the base Mac Pro (hell, the graphics processor beats the hell out of it) and cost about the same price too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 8:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wait, wait, wait... so the $300 aluminum body doesn't help with performance and is completely superficial?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Walrus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[It doesn't help with performance but its not really superficial either, as it serves as the structure and (exo?)skeleton of the laptop and helps make it weigh less.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[3rdman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uh... are there any laptops whose body construction materials improve performance? I thought the main point of them was to stop the insides from falling out, and maybe look nice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Epsilon-Not]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yep, Steve Jobs' taste of aesthetic perfection.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MetallicAfan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Walrus - how dumb would you have to be to believe that aluminum improves performance? I mean Apple has never said it improves performance, and neither has anybody else. You, apparently, are the only person on earth who actually thought it improved performance. Good job on that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess Zak has never heard of sarcasm...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sneakz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cost of having a macbook:<br><br>$999 + (1) Sense of Sarcasm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Being sarcastic about the aluminum helping performance would only work if somebody had ever made a claim like that. But since nobody ever has, Walrus fails, and so do you for not figuring that out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Heat-wise, yes the body construction directly affects performance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chispito]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah! Now sarcasm requires precedent.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you count sexyness superficial.<br>You do?<br>ehh...then....umm....environmental friendlyness, I suppose.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Moulton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 8:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think it actually can affect performance, as aluminium transfers heat much more efficiently than plastic, hence making the notebook run cooler (internally at least).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lundmark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 9:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[yes, that too...damn i miss mine....had to sell it :-(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Moulton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 9:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Zak, I'm terribly, terribly sorry I insulted one of your Gods. What do I need to sacrifice to cleanse myself of this atrocity that I have committed? <br><br>Can you spot the sarcasm now?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Walrus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 10:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why not 2.5ghz or 2.8? that would be nice]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[digitallysick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[There's a 2.8 GHz option on the 15" just like there's a 2.4Ghz on the 13".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iKrolm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 8:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[obvious and pointless post is obvious and pointless.....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just like your comment.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ipodrulz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[so was yours....<br><br>and arguably mine....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Both of yours were.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Moulton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[yay! pointless comments!<br><br>just like every other engadget comment by readers]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[so true.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Moulton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 8:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/updated-white-macbook-gets-benchmarked-outperforms-unibody-coun/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why do all you people feel a need to make comments that don't need to be made?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 8:06PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
