<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Work that has been "going on for a long time."<br><br>We totally believe you Microsoft. ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[grull27]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 1:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Technically that's true...I've been working on becoming a millionaire my whole life, the fact that I won the lottery jackpot is merely incidental.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michgar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you goto youtube and look up microsft playanywhere you would see they are telling the truth...<br>July 25, 2006 is the video post.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't doubt they were working on it.  That's probably the reason they found a company that was further along in the development.  Might as well buy them and cut back on R&D.<br><br>It was a smart move to not reinvent the wheel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kjb434]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[So if Apple were to have said and done the same thing, the fanboys would be all cheery cause the rotten Apple was ahead. But MS does it and they are lying and it's not true. If you i-Diots have a brain and know about the business world you would know that this is common for a business to do to make sure they have a competitive advantage...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[So basically they admit that they bought out "the little guy" just so they don't have competition. For every cool/good thing MS does they manage to pull off shit like this. What a douchey move. And don't start telling me about how it's protecting its business and other bullshit. They're huge, 3DV was tiny, they hardly offered any long-term threat. It's these kinds of stupid movies that give MS such a bad name, and of course it's fully deserved. :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wrabbit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 7:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[movies=movies<br>and this wasn't suppose to be a reply to the first post though I'm pretty sure it's my bad... still, say it with me Engadget - E-DIT]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wrabbit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 7:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA["movies=movies"<br><br>/facepalm slap<br><br>epic FAIL, I hang my head in shame]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wrabbit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 7:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wrabbit, it wasn't about buying a competitor but keeping a possible competitive advantage away from a competitor such as Sony or Nintendo or even Apple (if they decide to go into the console business).  Imagine what would have happened way back when if MS had bought out inMotion or whatever their name is, the people that everyone had to pay royalties to for rumble.  If they had bought them back then, then the xbox would have been the only console that could legally have had rumble in their controllers.  The electronics business is about 25% about what patents you own and 75% about the products you create.  By saying that they were protecting their business they are 100% correct.  They are keeping the tech out of competitors hands or if they choose they can license it to them and collect big time royalties.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[severian00]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 10:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah we built that in house using other's people IP.  Why else would they worry about it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nxp3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Microsoft and Sony have had this type of technology in the pipelines since the day they realised that people are going bananas for the Nintendo Wii. Technological industries are all about arms racing. And when you are working on something unique you want to make sure that you won't infringe on anyone else's patents and you want stay clear of the field, which means that any highly similar variations need to be eliminated. <br><br>If MS had not acquired 3DV, you can bet your mind that Nintendo and Sony would. This is how the industry works, and acquisitions take place on a daily basis. Apple too acquired a multitude of companies to make the iPhone become a reality. It's all about gaining ground fast and protecting your competitive advantage. All companies who diversify into new fields do this. NS has done nothing new or unusual. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Homeboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[So why were Apple so innovative when they bought fingerworks ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major4Play]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, I remember Sony working on stuff back with the PS2 EyeToy (or whatever it was called) so it wasn't really the Wii that prompted research.  Try again.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andir3.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 4:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA["the controller is a barrier" - Don Mattrick<br>"this is the endgame" - another M$ exec.<br><br>Controllers are so 2009. <br><br>Project Natal]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xcrunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[stop saying M$. they don't have a monopoly, its not the 90's]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[garrenteed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Natal has limited usability. Some games NEED a controller.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[liamf555]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[@liamf555<br><br>Yeah, thats why you obviously wont use natal with some games, u'd use a controller. Genius...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mizzike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[And some games NEED a keyboard, hasn't stopped consoles from pushing pc gaming onto the back burner.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[There doesn't seem to be any reason you can't use the regular control with this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MooseMuffin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 3:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[not in the EU they don't  ;-P<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 4:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really don't give a shit who made it, as long as it works like it did at E3 then I am sold. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ZZMitch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Best. Comment. EVER!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Anderson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is what I think of every time I see/hear 'Microsoft' and 'Buyout' in close proximity to each other:<br><br>  Homer: [reading Internet for Dummies: Remedial Edition] Oh, they have the Internet on computers now.<br>  Marge: Homer, Bill Gates is here.<br>  Homer: Bill Gates? Billionaire computer nerd Bill Gates? Oh, my God. Oh, my God. Get out of sight, Marge. I don't want this to look like a two-bit operation.<br>  Bill Gates: Mr. Simpson?<br>  Homer: You don't look so rich.<br>  Bill Gates: Don't let the haircut fool you. I'm exceedingly wealthy.<br>  Homer: [sotto voce] Get a load of the bowl job, Marge.<br>  Bill Gates: Your Internet ad was brought to my attention but I can't figure out what, if anything, CompuGlobalHyperMegaNet does. So, rather than risk competing with you, I've decided simply to buy you out.<br>  Homer: [softly] This is it, Marge. I poured my heart and soul into this business and now it's finally paying off. We're rich! Richer than astronauts!<br>  Marge: [softly] Homer, quiet! You'll queer the deal.<br>  Homer: Oh, right. [out loud] I reluctantly accept your proposal.<br>  Bill Gates: Well, everyone always does. Buy him out, boys.<br>    (assistants begin breaking things on Homer's dining table-turned-office)<br>  Homer: Hey, what the hell's going on?<br>  Bill Gates: Oh, I didn't get rich by writing a lot of checks. [cackles loudly] ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[A non eMous]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[They sure can hide their secrets]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Crazy_maniac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not that I really believe in that statement, but it make sense, anyway.<br><br>Maybe they bought 3DV to guarantee that another companies had any patents that could be used to contest MS creations. Or even bought them as additional specialized dev workforce for their own projects.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Verythrax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Use your heads people.<br><br>The 3DV camera uses infra-red time of flight measurements to get the distance of each pixel from the camera. However it decidedly not trivial to convert this distance image into a  model of a person (or people). I expect that that is the part Microsoft have been working on. Indeed there are other ways to get the depth map (e.g. stereoscopic cameras, laser scanning, etc.)<br><br>Engadget comments seem to be halfway between Slashdot comments and Youtube comments.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 5:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[digital puppetry anyone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BIOZHANG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[troll?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon-e-moose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[makes sense, they bought out a competitor to avoid brand confusion and add guys to the team who have experience. <br><br>microsoft spends more money on R&D per year than some companies spend in their entire existance ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AnnoyingPoster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 6th 2009 12:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[testing trolls]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon-e-moose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[now if only i could get my hands on natal right now...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TRS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[So, (even if we believe them), it basically means that Microsoft had been developing this stuff for years, but got *beaten* to market by another company doing the same thing but with different tech, ... then they got *beaten* at the patent office because their tech was not as good, or different enough from these guys to go ahead?  This is lame-a-tude at it's very best.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gazoobee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Or, possibly MS envisions enough potential in this tech that they'd like to be the only ones offering it, and thus they purchased  the competition before someone else did.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[All of this smell fishy.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Magallanes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 3:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[And how is this different from Apple buying Fingerworks for their iPhone tech?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Strangis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[ Micro$oft  (NYSE: M$) paid big anti-trust violation fines in Europe, their operating system runs on 90% of the personal computers in the world, and they just bought the biggest technology competitor to the motion sensing system they've been working on - how is that not a monopoloy? Just because it's a new decade, they are no less of an illegal monopoly and no less of a threat to innovation and productivity.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mechabob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Three words: Learn then speak.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[ You just proved they are not a monopoly...<br> "their operating system runs on 90% of the personal computers in the world," since a monopoly would be 100% you just proved they do not have a monopoly.. Also for them to have a monopoly they would have to buy out Apple for their OS, and buyout every linux vendor... as long as you have a choice in OS then they dont have a monopoly.. learn what something is becuase you show how much of a troll you are... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Numus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple is currently under investigation for anti-trust issues. At one time hey claimed to have 82% of the market share of portable media players. Apple also purchased iTunes (formerly known as SoundJam MP) tech to create a monopoly in the music player market.<br><br>How much did Apple innovate when they said "I will pay you $x to buy your media player"?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nohone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 3:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jesus, get over yourself.<br><br>Microsoft bought it, so what?!?!?<br><br>its still epic, i have a mac pro and also an xbox 360 and a dell running vista. they are all good for their own things, stop being a stupid add fanboy.<br><br>is Microsoft didn't buy this company they would have copyright and patent issues, or another company would have bought it. its not microsofts fault its so epic, it just is. nobody forces people to use the microsoft OS, and nobody is forcing you.<br>GTFO]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joseph nickson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 3:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Numus: In Economics, a Monopoly is NOT 100%.  Wikipedia actually has good definitions for economic monopolies:<br>--------------------------------<br>In economics, a monopoly exists when a specific individual or enterprise has sufficient control over a particular product or service to determine significantly the terms on which other individuals shall have access to it.[1] Monopolies are thus characterized by a lack of economic competition for the good or service that they provide and a lack of viable substitute goods.[2] The verb "monopolize" refers to the process by which a firm gains persistently greater market share than what is expected under perfect competition.<br>--------------------------------<br>a coercive monopoly is a business concern that prohibits competitors from entering the field, with the natural result being that the firm is able to make pricing and production decisions independent of competitive forces.[1] A coercive monopoly is not merely a sole supplier of a particular kind of good or service (a monopoly), but it is a monopoly where there is no opportunity to compete through means such as price competition, technological or product innovation, or marketing; entry into the field is closed.<br>--------------------------------<br><br>In other words, so powerful that there's no way to compete.  Microsoft IS a convicted monopolist in several countries.  Due to corrupt politics though, they were not properly dealt with.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andir3.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 4:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jon - What does that even mean? Do you even speak English? Are you really a 6th grader?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanchez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 11:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just hope MS realize the full potential Project Natal has beyond games.  This leapfrogs over touch UI.  Forget Surface  They should integrate it with PC, Mobile, etc.  Possibities are endless.  Not as the sole input but as an addition to existing methods of input.  If done right, this could change the way we interact with technology.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mailbox01]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[They realize about it but they are struck on something, may be about the price or how well it works.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Magallanes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 3:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[I believe their statement. Bill Gate alluded to this technology a couple of years ago. I bet they bought 3DV because they didn't want Sony or Nintendo to buy it and sue them for stealing tech. The alleged 30 million dollar purchase price for 3DV is pretty minor to expand their patent rights. <br><br>I also think this tech is also coming to the PC. I bet MS has BIG plans for this technology.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[They are probably licensing the tech from gesturetek. go look at gestureteks website. does the same exact stuff.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[majortom1981]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 3:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[So are we to assume that if MS didn't "button up" 3DV and 3DV didn't allow a buyout, Natal would have never seen the light of day?<br><br>If MS was the true creator of this technology and owner of the patents then there shouldn't have been a reason to buy 3DV for any reason. Obviously 3DV owns the tech and MS doesn't want to get into a legal battle. It's much cheaper for them to buy the tech then to pay their lawyers, rival settlement fees and licensing fees.<br><br>They did the right thing so this product could be introduced and widely available to the consumer but they shouldn't blow so much smoke.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SuperPartyRobot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 3:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[orly?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maveric101]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 3:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wonders if the tech works sort of like the Radiohead House of Cards video... <a href="http://code.google.com/creative/radiohead/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/creative/radiohead/</a> ... at least that's the first thing that came to mind when I read about this.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 3:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/04/microsoft-says-3dv-acquisition-didnt-influence-project-natal/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its so hard to say that project Natal is just it, a simple project.<br><br>Technically speaking, the problem of a motion capture system is:<br>a) price.<br>b) setup.<br>c) Precision.<br>d) cpu power needing.<br>e) lag.<br><br>May be MS cheated when showed Natal, after all MS is seasoned to do such things.<br><a href="http://news.cnet.com/Xbox-360-demos-running-on-Macs/2100-1043_3-5706658.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/Xbox-360-demos-running-on-Macs/2100-1043_3-5706658.html</a><br><br>WiiMote works fine because it was the sum of proved technologies and still present many troubles, Instead to capture movement with camera is a real different thing,the technology is anything but 100% working and proved, even a expensive mocap system usually present problem with the precision.  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Magallanes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 3:29PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
