<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[want.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 1:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is this what you want?  Full frontal with external viewfinder and two lenses.<br><br><a href="http://i44.tinypic.com/wtwzfb.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i44.tinypic.com/wtwzfb.jpg</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BigD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 6:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh nostalgia, how I love it when someone does the right ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Walrus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 1:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[They got the retro-styling right, yes.<br><br>But there are still possible weaknesses, which may be why Olympus took so long in releasing this. Here's some food for thought:<br><br>1) How good is the EVF? (electronic viewfinder?) The G1 was widely praised for its excellent EVF but it uses a Panasonic-only technology; can Olympus do the same?<br>2) How good is the lens? Okay, Olympus has always had a good track record here, but even the 25mm f2.8 had major weaknesses, like flare. Pancake primes are a little harder to get right than big primes. And how soon can they get a good range for lenses to market?<br>3) Is the AutoFocus as good as the G1? Remember, in terms of contrast detect autofocus, M4/3 cameras cannot use the really fast DSLR phase detect autofocus; so insead Panasonic developed a really fast version of contrast detect autofocus, the usually slow method used on compacts. <br>4) Battery life. M4/3 cameras use the LCD, which drains more power. Is the battery up to the task? In fact, it'd be nice to have a analogue viewfinder attach to the flash hot shoe. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[YpoCaramel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 1:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think there will be a EVF in this Olympas. But to the Sigma Dp-1 It's looks nice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Young5leo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2009 5:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[It would be very detrimental to my wallet if these guys released this thing this summer, but bring it on Olympus. I am convinced that MFT will create an entirely new camera market that hasn't seen the light of day since digital. I am salivating.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Searcy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 1:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[It strikes the right blend between retro... in this case Olympus's classic Pen line... and sleek modern.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 1:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, the camera is an E-P1. So the E-System Pen 1? It would also explain the recent Pen videos that have been released each week for the 50th anniversary of the Pen. <a href="http://asia.olympus-imaging.com/products/dslr/special/pen50th/pen/" rel="nofollow">http://asia.olympus-imaging.com/products/dslr/special/pen50th/pen/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spyker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 1:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Though it may never have an *official* meaning, the P does seem to be a nod to the earlier system. <br><br>It was suspected that there would be a connection to the anniversary celebration and the upcoming announcement before these photos leaked out. Now that seems certain. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 4:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey, it looks like my tip was helpful :).<br><br>Can't wait for an official announcement, I've been hearing a lot of rumors about this camera. 12MP, 720p video, $990 w/ kit lens, etc. I think the announcement is supposed to be 6/15. Not sure.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spyker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 1:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[toot. (your horn) ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Agent .25i]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 9:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Even after knowing the prospect of a proper micro 4/3 shooter from Olympus, I decided to get the Ollie E-420 with a pancake lens. Happy with it. Now, if this E-P1 is anything to compete (which I highly doubt now...) I'd sell and get this :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[niloc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 1:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[this could become the pocketable point and shoot sized camera for camera buffs!<br><br>Going out for a quick bite to eat, don't feel like lugging the SLR with a few lens' and a flash....  just pop this baby in the pocket and you're set!<br><br>Me want too!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaws]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 1:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[If only other camera makers would make something like that! *cough*Canon G9*cough*<br>But seriously this is one cool retro looking camera]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 5:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Adam, you're missing the point.  A canon g9 has a sensor about 9-10x smaller than this.  This camera essentially has a DSLR-sized sensor.  No, not full frame, but can be compared to most non full frame DSLRs.  Noise ratio, if like the e-series, will pale in comparison to Nikon/Canon, but who cares... this is a dream system for many people looking for a small, near pocketable alternative to the sigma series w/ interchangeable lenses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John_R]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 10:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[OMG YES! About time someone made a small d-SLR which doesn't suck!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cunthor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 2:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not an SLR. It has an SLR sensor but no prism based viewfinder. It will basically be 1/2 the size of an SLR and always use LiveView]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ethicsg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 4:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is not a DSLR. There is no mirror... so you don't look through the lens.  You must rely on the LCD screen or viewfinder (if any).<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Scrip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 3:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[True, but it has the same image quality as a non micro 4/3 from Olympus, and you can change lenses. I worded it wrong in the first post, my bad. <br><br>This should be the photographers' compact, and about time we get one!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cunthor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 3:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Michael, <br><br>We know, we know...  It's not technically a DSLR.  Thanks for teaching us, dad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LloydChiro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 9:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[@LloydChiro,<br><br>>> "We know, we know... It's not technically a DSLR. Thanks for teaching us, dad."<br><br>Obviously not... since the OP mistakenly called it a DSLR.<br><br>The big selling point of Micro Four Thirds is the fact that it does NOT have a mirror box... which makes the camera much smaller.<br><br>Have a good day, son.<br><br>Dad<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Scrip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 3:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm going to call the micro four thirds cameras with interchangeable lenses DSLRs just to annoy the really pedantic peeps. Yes, they lack a prism. But they're still digital single-lens cameras, so DSL is still accurate, and the R now stands for "Reflexively complains about the camera not being a *real* SLR."<br><br>I was about to get excited about this camera having a sweet ultra-wide f/2.8, but then I realized the micro four thirds doubles the focal length equivalent. So it's really a 34mm f/2.8 in full-frame equivalent, which is respectable, but nothing to get excited about. Call me when they're offering an 8mm f/2.8.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 5:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[A side and frontal photo at this thread:<br><a href="http://forum.xitek.com/showthread.php?threadid=628866" rel="nofollow">http://forum.xitek.com/showthread.php?threadid=628866</a><br>Not as retro as I would like, but we will find out on JUNE 9th!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[keithwwalker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 2:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh boy, this says $990 dollars for the camera and lens. It doesn't say which currency, but $990 Taiwan = $30 US and $990 Hong Kong = $127 US, which are both impossible. $990 Singapore Dollars = $680 US, which might be doable. But if it's actually $990 US, forget it. Anyone know for sure?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sizer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 4:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Someone commented on one of the other mft posts that Olympus cameras always sell for way less, and that official prices are just pr stunts. If that's right, then this could have a $990 price tag but come much cheaper. Here's hoping, anyway. (Actually, here's hoping the other, sexier mft camera comes much cheaper.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pyrthas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 10:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm eager to see what they have, but probably not eager to hand over the cold hard cash. Reasons?<br><br>1) a compact interchangeable lens cam will nearly always be bigger than most compacts (especially with a zoom) and not really be pocketable<br>2) waiting out for a decent range of Micro Four Thirds lenses. At 34mm equivalent angle of view, and F2.8, is there anything to write home about here?<br>3) the price of this (and lenses) will likely be far higher than most compacts. This new lens is an 'unknown' at present, but the specs don't exactly excite. If Panasonic's Micro Four Thirds efforts are any idea, it probably won't be on par with the bulk of the Four Thirds lens line-up.<br>4) it isn't 100% compatible with Four Thirds, and even if it were, wouldn't the compactness of this initiative mean nothing then?<br>5) what they do have going for them is perhaps a quality cam with a large sensor that is best suited to some good primes, but have they delivered with this 34mm equivalent, F2.8? I say no, especially if you are looking to use it as a low-light lens, and especially not at the price this will sell for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekdroid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 2:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tekdroid: you pretty much have no idea what you're talking about, but you sure take your time doing it.<br><br>Just google micro 4/3 m adapter and you will see that the lenses are already there.  There are already pictures all over of Summilux and Nokton lenses on early Micro 4/3 cameras.  We're just waiting for this body.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zorg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 8:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[zorg, <br>I know about the adaptors... is that is your idea of compact and 100% compatibility? If so, don't let me spoil your fun. Invalidates none of what I said. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekdroid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 12:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Using both hotshoe and the mount distance (which we know is about 20mm) as points of reference, I estimate that with the pancake lens this is only slightly larger than my old Pentax PC35AF. The latter does fit, with room to spare, in my jacket pocket.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 3:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah Oly how I love thee... this camera looks to be a beauty! It's great to see that Oly may become the king once again with the REAL photographic world. Suck it Canon (Nikon you are ok)...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chasen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 3:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Folks,<br><br>If you can read Traditional Chinese, it apparently will be launched on June 16th GLOBALLY! Olympus will also hold an product launching event in Hong Kong to the public but all 3 time-slots have been sold out.<br><br><a href="http://www.olympus.com.hk/olympus/tc/events/current_event/detail.html?int_id=1053&type=events_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.olympus.com.hk/olympus/tc/events/current_event/detail.html?int_id=1053&type=events_new</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[howi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 3:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[They should sell this at cost just to build some market share. But, because it's Olympus it will be over priced- at least $700- and will be eventually ignored and outclassed by Canon and Panasonic in 6 months. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Enblabber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 4:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Other Olympus cameras aren't overpriced.  Have you looked at the E420 or E520?  Bargains! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LloydChiro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 9:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let alone the E-620! For $800 right now with a two lens kit it is a much better deal the the Sony, Canon, or Nikon offerings. Still just get a D40 and use it well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ethicsg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2009 3:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[17mm? f/2.8?? that sucks.<br><br>there is already 25mm "PanCake" with f/2.8 and many owners complain that it would have been imminently more useful with f/2.0.<br><br>they should release PanCake with f/2.0...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 5:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[The regular four-thirds 25mm pancake won't work on this camera without an adapter. And when you add the depth of said adapter the whole thing isn't really "pancake" size anymore. Also there is a reasonable difference between 17mm (35mm equiv.) and 25mm (50mm equivalent).<br><br>Now Panasonic is supposedly working on a 20mm f1.7 (pancake) for µ4:3 bodies.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 5:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[*Sorry, 34mm equivalent. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 5:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plothole, thanks for the info, man!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 5:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes. Olympus i'm back. That is the perfect addon for my D300. Poor mans Leica :) The lenses from Zuiko are great. The image quality of 4/3 isn't at Nikon or Canon, but it's better than anything in the compact range. Sure the price isn't compact, but you have to compare it to Leica ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tscherno]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 6:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[FYI, DPReview is reporting that Olympus has a hands-on event scheduled for June 25th in London.<br><br><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0906/09060201olypen50years.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0906/09060201olypen50years.asp</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 9:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[very sexy look, will those zoom lens be smaller too?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 10:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think this leak is on purpose since the one who shot this obviously had time (it's not a camphonepic) and only the least interesting angles are chosen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bluecold]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 10:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sensor size, sensor size, sensor size?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bad Beaver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 10:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[FourThirds.<br>A tiny bit smaller than APS-C. Canon fanboys will try to make you believe its a huge difference, but it's not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bluecold]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah, here we go:<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sensor_sizes_overlaid_inside.svg" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sensor_sizes_overlaid_inside.svg</a><br><br>No Canon fanboy here, but that *is* significantly smaller. Nevertheless, I am looking forward to seeing the output. Somehow I doubt people will like the price.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bad Beaver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 11:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[4:3 is ~30% smaller than APS-C.<br><br>Oly uses Panasonic LiveMOS sensor which has worse ISO performance compared to Canikon. On my Oly E-520 on ISO-800 I'm getting about the same amount of noise I see on shots from 400D and 1000D with ISO 1600.<br><br>Taking into account excellent Oly optics, in the end difference is negligible.<br><br>Though we are yet to see full u4:3 optics line-up. That would be decisive factor for me. I'd love to have some compact camera with compact 50mm eq., f/2.0 lens to accompany it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[So go save up for your Leica S2 and Hasselblad H3 and leave those of us who care heavily about camera size alone so we can go around and take more pictures.<br><br>Current exsisting micro 4/3 cameras are competitive with entry level DSLRs up to ISO800. Imaging Resource and DPreview both came to that conclusion with the G1. Whether that's good enough for you, only you can decide. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[YpoCaramel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes 4/3 has about 70% of the APS-C sensor size, but this will be a gamechanging compact camera. <br><br>Sizewise its about same size as Canon G10, but canons sensor is only 20% of the micro 3/4 sensor. If they can price it anywhere near the G10s price this will knock it out of the market]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Newone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 2:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bad Beaver, <br><br>The nice thing about seeing a camera with a 4/3rds logo is that you automatically know what the sensor size is, and you don't need to hunt down the spec sheet to find out. <br><br>It's smaller than an APS sensor, but far, far bigger than the average point and shoot camera's sensor. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LloydChiro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2009 8:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/07/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-shooter-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[That EP-1 logo on the back right is SOOOO freegen shopped. Distortion is badly done, dead give away. But don't get WRONG .... *drool* at ANY news .. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John from Buffalo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2009 11:51AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
