<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[...yeeeeeees, nice one queeg...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sven vollstag]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 8:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[$349 for $120GB?<br><br>... it's getting there but it's not quite there yet.  Let's halve that (At least) then we'll talk]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RoboDan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2009 12:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tempting, but the drive still costs as much as the netbook itself. Getting closer...!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Windhawk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2009 7:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pretty decent price for the 120 GB one, considering not too long ago a 32 GB (which is now more accurately named as 30) drive was $300.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricardo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 8:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pretty horrible price considering I can get 1.5-2 TB (at least 10 times more) for the same money. What do I get with SSD? Faster write times? Faster read times? So, my movie will load faster? Or I will save about 1 hour in 10 years in Windows loads?<br><br>I'd get one if I could get 512gb for $200 or less.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shinigami]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pricing is decent, not exceptional. Even the really fast Intel X25-M 80GB is going for $290 at Newegg these days, and the 120GB Vertex for about $330 IIRC. <br><br>The problem is, until we know the controller inside, we don't know how the Agility will perform and therefore what to compare it against. It is a fair price for a Indilinx or Samsung controller - I don't know how the new JMicrons will perform. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[YpoCaramel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 10:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[The controller is Indilinx just like the Vertex, but don't waste your time:<br><br><br>OCZ Vertex 120GB $350 <br><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227395" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227395</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2009 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[corsair 256gb p256 is 700 so... and that one is 128 mb cache and 200+mb read and write so i dont see how this is cheaper than any other ssds.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[va jj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 8:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well it would be silly for this to have a 128MB cache...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Patriks7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 10:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Patriks7: No. It wouldn't be silly. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[comment_system=Fail]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2009 2:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't understand the differentiators between their models. These are the same price as the Vertex series and the same performance....<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[junk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 8:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[I paid $570 for my 64 GB SLC drive after rebate. I'd definitely snap that 120 GB drive up if I was building a desktop right about now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wickedpheonix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 8:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOl you can't really compare a SLC to this lol i mean ya MLC's are wicked but SLC's are a different league lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not many SLCs left, MLC really has improved to the point of little or no difference (and sometimes even better write speeds).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[the only diff between an MLC and an SLC is write speed and write life.  an MLC lasts a decently long time, like at least 5 years.  at which point you'll have retired the drive for something that's an order of magnitude larger in capacity.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[titanic panic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 11:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mine was a first-gen though when the MLC JMicron controllers were flawed and SLC drives were substantially faster. In theory, MLC is faster than SLC according to my understanding and that is coming true with the improved MLC firmwares that are being released.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wickedpheonix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 11:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[SLC? MLC?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amrosorma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 8:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[MLC.  Too bad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Green]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[64MB Cache / MLC]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daniel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm curious, what's the difference?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rells009]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-level_cell" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-level_cell</a><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-level_cell" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-level_cell</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shinigami]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[engadget, why havent you made any news topics about the gskill falcon drives??<br><br>they are the same drives as the ocz vertex drives but much cheaper. 60/120gb ocz vertex = £190/330, gskill falcon 60/120gb = £163/250.<br><br>make a news topic for these drives as they arent getting publicised and no-one knows about them so ocz is able to charge crazy prices.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 8:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[gskill runs a different firmware, so their performance in real world tests doent live up to the vertex series.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[youngstunna]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 8:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[OCZ has been matching the price of the GSkill with mail-in rebates.<br><br>They are essentially the exact same thing, so the GSkill is the better buy.  I think some of the GSkill go with 64GB/128GB sizes as well for the same price.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 8:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[OCZ nor GSkill make the firmware.  That is provided by the chipset maker, which is neither of those companies.<br><br>Neither is any faster than the other.  It depends which model you are looking at.  The 120/128 version has faster write speeds than the lower versions.  Other results are purely varying test beds.  They both use the Indilinx controller, so are virtually identical except density and cache amount.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 8:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[because the gskills suck performance wise do to crappy firmware check just about any of the reviews, vertex and torqx get rated high and the intel gets rated high for read, but its write sucks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[They dont have crappy firmware.  They have the same firmware that is provided to OCz because the firmware is NOT made by OCZ nor GSkill, but is made by the actual provider of the hardware.<br><br>What you get with OCZ is better support, which might be worth the extra money (before rebate that is), but they are NOT slower than the OCZ.  They are exactly the same.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[For proof, here it is performing similarly to the OCZ unit:<br><br><a href="http://www.guru3d.com/article/gskill-falcon-128gb-ssd-review/7" rel="nofollow">http://www.guru3d.com/article/gskill-falcon-128gb-ssd-review/7</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[These new "Vertex" series drives are awesome.  They beat the Intel MLC drives in many tests, and are substantially cheaper per GB.<br><br>They are finally in the affordable range.  A pair of 30's in Raid 0 annihilates anything out there.  Its the perfect OS drive array.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 8:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Until you try and do a non-sequential write to it, and get a blistering 0.6 MB/s write speed. <br><br>There is a reason the Intel MLC drives are so expensive, and it's because they actually have a fast random-write speed. As in 30+ MB/s instead of the under 1 MB/s that the OCZ drives offer. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kyphros]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 8:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[These are MLC drives.<br><br>And they are extremely fast at non-sequential read/write.  These arnt the same as the old Patriot/Corsair drives which had very sporatic performance.  These are very consistent. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[And yes, the SLC Intel drives are faster overall, but not 2+ times the price faster, especially in real world performance tests:<br><br><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3535&p=4" rel="nofollow">http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3535&p=4</a><br><br>Performance would be much better with a pair of 60's in Raid-0, which would cost less than one X-25 and provide more hard drive space.<br><br>Besides, these drives are stop-gaps until SSD's get much faster and much cheaper in the near future.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[MLC i mean.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ruben<br><br>As noted by many reviewers, the Intel X25M's super high random write speed is completely unnecessary for non-server applications and provides no benefits for consumer use --- while also vastly reducing the X25's sequential write speeds.<br><br>While ~1.5MB/sec in random write doesn't seem like much, it is 3X faster than the 10K RPM velociraptor drive and 50-100X faster than the older JMicron drives. IT is plenty of random write bandwidth to avoid the stuttering problem seen with older JMicron controller drives, and that is all that really matters.<br><br>Anyone that doesn't believe me, go do your own research. The OCZ Vertex drive is extremely popular, and doesn't experience the dramatic slow-down problem that is seen in the Intel X25, and is 50+% cheaper per GB.<br><br>You can get a 120GB Vertex for $350 from newegg:<br><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227395" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227395</a><br><br>And no, I don't work for OCZ. I am just a fan of their products..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2009 12:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ loosely_fucked in the head<br><br>Are you still spewing this bullshit?<br><br>I've debunked this so many time in previous SSD posts yet here you are, copying and pasting your pat response in here.<br><br>maybe it's time for a banhammer to come down on some paid astroturfer.<br><br>random read write is ALL that matters in the real world.<br>bullshit test platforms that simulate streaming a video or any other lo IOPS intensive task are worthless.<br><br>and also, due to the wear leveling employed on SSD drives at the block level, anything larger than a dsingle block is written RANDOMLY to the drive.<br>This would include MOST EVERY FILE ON YOUR COMPUTER.<br><br>high random speeds also means that real world application testing (like openimg a couple of programs at the same time, or say doing something like playing a game and having the game program also reading ahead to display the next part of the map you are about to come to, happen much better and more seamlessly.<br><br>That's why people bought the raptors/velociraptors in the first place, not for overall sequential speed but for the increase in random speed.<br><br>it's also why most of the "faster hard rives" spin *gasp* faster!<br><br>the more times per minute that same sector comes under the read/write head, the more chances there are to read those random bits scattered over the disc.<br><br>random performance is all that matters when testing out real world performance of drives of any type.<br><br>unless of course all you do is write single large files to your drive and never change them.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mikeg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2009 11:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah c'mon! No 256GB? Boo]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[OCZ Vertex 250GB is about $700.. Excellent drive though. these "Agility" drives are basically the same as the vertex (same indilinux controller), almost the same speed and price. Not sure why they even made them...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2009 12:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Half the price, and it will be *almost* affordable for the same capacity. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cunthor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[dude the Intel MLC's are good but their write speed sucks, 70mb really REALLY INTEL! I mean ya they read fast as hell but come on an even 100 woulda been useful...<br><br>anyway<br> <br>i want to see the benchmark of these vs the vertex and torqx and the intel m model, as i was ready to buy a 80gb intel-m for 290 but skipped on it because i really wanted atleast 120, this seems like a solid price and if it's in the same ballpark speedwise as the torqx/vertex/intel-m then its wicked.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't understand. 60GB Vertex drives are $200 on Newegg. Unless the lower $220 MSRP means even cheaper from Newegg, I don't see the point. Just lower the Vertex prices. ???]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisk1590]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Write speed is only important if you plan on using these as your swapfile diskdrive. Or in a server with high user interaction. For a desktop, writespeed is not important as you just install software once and who really cares if that takes the same time as HDD speeds. Hell, I'd take a pair of two 30 gig-ers and put my OS on one and my swapfile on the other and be very happy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m.edgar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA["For a desktop, writespeed is not important as you just install software once and who really cares if that takes the same time as HDD speeds."<br><br>220 MB/s read times aren't much use if an I/O queue greater than unity causes it to fall flat on its face.<br><br>Write speed, random write speed, and how the drive handles multiple I/O calls very definitely does make a difference on a desktop: as a boot drive has to handle the swap partition, virus and malware scans, indexing, searches... in short quite a lot of junk.<br><br>An SSD is not worth paying for unless it can cut through these kinds of tasks like a hot knife through butter.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bebop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2009 3:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[meh. id still like to see these beat my two samsung 320's in raid0. bought both for 100 from newegg.<br>only thing they have on it is seek time]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kavu44]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 9:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[2 ssd's in raid0 will in fact beat the crap out of your setup, both in read/write speeds and in latency]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[titanic panic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 11:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Even one non-JMF602 based SSD such as OCZ Vertex will beat the crap out of your RAID0 HDDs under typical desktop disk access patterns e.g. game loading time. PCMark Vantage HDD benchmarks does exactly that.<br>RAID 0 is only benefitable to HDD for lots of sequential writes and reads like video editing. The moment those heads have to move around they lose to SSD.<br><br>And what are you going to do with 640GB worth of space in RAID0 besides storing ~100GB of OS+app+games? Personal data in RAID0??? ROFL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wuzy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2009 6:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[OCZ - can you please make an ExpressCard slot version, please? <br><br>Because I am carrying about 150GB of movies, music and other data on my laptop, so switching to the SSD alone is not possible. But the rest of my data, and this is where the SSD speed would really count, can easily fit in 64GB. The operating system, applications, caches, work data... it would all fit in 64GB no problem. But I like to be able to carry my media library with me at all times.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nikster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 10:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think you need your OS in your system more than your apps and games. Just get multiple flash drives and label them, or a portable 1.8" USB HDD. This should cover your needs nicely: <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822161072" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822161072</a><br><br>4200 RPM should still work fine for your movies and music.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wickedpheonix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 11:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[@wicked - this isn't a bad idea at all. Now if they just made a 1.8" ExpressCard version of this 240GB drive, that would be perfect. Don't like things dangling off of my laptop. <br><br>Multiple flash drives is also an option considering that they get cheaper by the day.... hmm... something to think about... <br><br>The neat thing of having everything and anything on one drive though is that there is no hassle with managing the data. Just one large drive, and one larger backup drive, that's it. No "wait, I know I have this movie you want, let me sort through my external drives"... stuff like that. Yep, I am a hunter and gatherer.... <br><br>Whoops waitaminute, I might have found what I was looking for... only 24GB... but this is super duper exciting!!!<br><br><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820161324" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820161324</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nikster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2009 2:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[to the guys saying the ocz firmware is better than the gskill it isnt lindinix makes the firmwares as it's their chipset, gskill released a new firmware which puts it on par with the ocz vertex on 4th june i think which 2 weeks after those reviews were published.<br><br>so you get the same fast speed but for much cheaper:)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2009 11:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/10/ocz-intros-2-5-inch-agility-ssd-line-120gb-for-349-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh wow.. that's SO much more cost effective than...<br><br>THIS...<br><br><a href="http://www.a-power.com/product-8191-290-1" rel="nofollow">http://www.a-power.com/product-8191-290-1</a><br><br>500GB 2.5" drive for $120 CANADIAN... Which is around $108.<br><br>You could buy TWO, put on in a drive case and use the spare to regularly do backups.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Lewis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2009 12:40AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
