<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[as long as its android and not that windows ce crap im in.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 7:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sponsored in part by Snappiness™  Get yours today!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blackstar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 10:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Windows CE is actually wonderful for devices.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Quikboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 1:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can make Windows "snappier" by turning down the default delays on showing menus etc.  For instance the default on the Start menu is 400 ms, nearly half a second of delay between clicking and showing the menu, purposely built into Windows.  Change the registry setting to 40ms and it too is snappy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scarhawk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2009 3:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[So, am I the only one that finds it funny you are pointing to performance benefits "when it did work"?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 7:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[+1]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[I suppose this can be forgiven slightly when it's not purpose built for a smartbook, whereas win7 is purpose built for all types of computer?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Exactly what I thought. Interesting that they only chose to report on the snappiness and just disregarded the suggestion that it's apparently quite a hassle to get Android to work.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 9:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[And Window Mobile also more snappier on ARM than Window 7...who cares!<br>Media making news out of no news.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[roach]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[No. You're not the only one who noticed that. lol<br><br>"When this car works... it will get you to the supermarket faster than that other car.  Oh, but when it doesn't... you'll just have to walk." lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tofo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[No thanks. Leave Android on smartphones PLEASE.... A Windows 7 netbook (with multitouch) would be ideal.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TareX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 7:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[God forbid consumers should be given a choice!  We should just have Windows 7 on everything!!!<br><br>All most poeple use netbooks for is browsing the web and email and Android can do that fine.  You may not want an Android computer but I don't see why you need to PLEAD for them not to make one.  If you don't want one simply don't buy one.  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gartner is made of the biggest bunch of idiots I've ever seen in the analyst field (which is a field of idiots by itself).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[the purpose of a netbook is for a convenient and surf-anywhere concept, as long as an OS can provide a friendly interface it is good to go. the big plus would be free and longer battery life. Android is free, but we have yet to know the battery performance on this OS yet.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[techmostwanted]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow an os meant for embedded devices is faster than Windows 7 on a relatively low specced processor, WHOD HAVE THOUGHT IT!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ArcticFox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah - Win 7 does a hell lot more than Android, starting with a much more graphically complex UI. It's really a *huge* surprise that it taxes hardware more than a, in comparison, simplistic OS/UI...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can you really compare the two?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex R]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apparently, yes.<br><br>Manufacturers of ARM CPU netbooks need to look somewhere for an OS.  So far, on the Atom platform, people much prefer Windows XP to custom Linux builds (and of course to Vista).  Windows for ARM is not a possibility, so it's natural to turn to something like Android, which has the backing of Google.<br><br>The main point here (whether or not it matters in the end) is that MS has been having serious problems scaling their OS (which is the reason Vista was such a disaster, the reason they lied about minimum system requirements on behalf of Intel, etc.).  If Windows 7 doesn't perform well on Atom netbooks and there's a much cheaper alternative that has a decent OS and a decent browser with a decent selection of applications, then that's kind of significant.<br><br>I'm still waiting for Android to have much of a selling point outside of phones, so we'll see what happens.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dennis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 10:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Directly, no you can't. But you could compare them if you compare Android on ARM to Android on Atom then compare Android on Atom to Windows on Atom.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Garst]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 5:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Symbian and Atom would be the fastest. Yes, it's possible.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suomaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think I'd prefer a setup that runs all my applications (including my business apps) slightly slower than one that doesn't run them at all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jakem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think you mistake who these netbooks are aimed at! They are aimed at the mass market where people are not as tech savvy as the people who write on this website..<br><br>The mass market wants low cost machines that do everything (this will be the only computer for most homes) in a way they know. As the mass market knows Windows, that is what they want hence why so many Linux based EEE PC's were returned in exchange for the XP version.<br><br>The mass market can take the performance hit that comes with Windows over Android, Linux etc.. They are a patient bunch unlike the minority (us)!<br><br>I personally have an IBM X31 with Windows 7 Ultimate RC on it and it performs beautifully so I am sure the cut down versions of Windows 7 will perform well on most netbooks.<br><br>Shoot me down for saying this if you want but here is my prediction<br><br>We never see Android on a Netbook that sells well.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paraffin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 2:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is only a problem if your use for the netbook, or in this case, sub netbook is to run your business applications on a tiny screen on a tiny device. It is not the same for everybody. I admit, I wouldn't have much use for such a device either.  But I know several people who would be delighted with one. <br><br>But look at it in a slightly different way. Think of it as an android smart phone with a built in keyboard that you can use with more than your  thumbs, and a bigger screen that you can use for more stuff that would be just too fiddly for use on a phone. . Doesn't have to be Windows compatible, doesn't have to have a huge software library, although the Android phone apps should be ok on this. <br><br>It's just one class of devices in a whole palette of options. It's ok if they don't all do the same things. Diversity is good. And there will be many many people who just want light note taking and surfing abilities with a little bit of PIM and a few casual games thrown in. I can see a lot of potential for such things. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Bailey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's fine John but the point of the article was that Gartner were recommending Android-based netbooks to businesses purely based on performance.  I was just pointing out that that's not a great reason to recommend a solution to businesses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jakem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 9:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shocking really, that a mobile os running on chips it was designed for, would be snappier than a multi purpose, big fat system on crippled netbook-class silicon. <br>How bout "formula 1 cars go better on closed, wide circuits, than VW wagons on rally trails". <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't worry, when they finally get the last of the DOS code removed from W7, it will run just as fast as Android. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[There hasn't been any "DOS code" in Windows since version Windows 2000...Me was the last one that was using a DOS foundation.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually I've ignored any 9x flavor, so since Windows NT 3.5, DOS is no more..<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jakob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[How to compare an orange to a window.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m-p{3}]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ummm duh.  Android has virtually no features out of the box and even then a good file browser is few and far between.  All android is, is a framework.  It doesn't even have network share browsing capability.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Doe.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 9:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[This whole discussion of smartbooks - it doesn't remind anyone of the Palm Foleo? If the Foleo was a load of fail then I don't see why smartbooks would be any different even if the modem is built-in to the smartbooks instead of being tethered.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wickedpheonix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 9:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[The main concept problem of the Foleo was it was tied to a Palm smartphone to work properly and cost afair $600+, limitations that those upcoming smartbooks don't have.<br><br>But still, I think that smartbook manufacturers will have a hard time convincing people to buy their devices considering that Linux netbooks haven't been much of a success despite lower prices than their Windows counterparts, and smartbooks are even more different from what people are used to (=Windows)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 9:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shhhhh L.  Don't upset the tard.  You have no idea how they will react.  Prob spaz out on you and start throwing their feces around.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Doe.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 9:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[To be honest, I'm wondering why you'd want Windows on a device like a Netbook (er, anyone know what the current dictionary definition is for a "Smartbook"?).  Give it WiFi and cellular network connectivity and access to cloud-based applications like Google Docs and you're golden.  I can see the point of Windows on desktops and laptops where you have quite a lot of computing resources to throw around but on something as pokey as a Netbook you might as well let web applications do the heavy lifting.  All that needs to be addressed are any privacy and availability concerns.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelmon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 9:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[1080p video on a 10" screen?  What's the point....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chimera]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 9:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[the point is that if it has hdmi out you can plug it into a tv and have an easy way to transport and play hd videos. the other point is that if someone has a large library of hd videos they won't have to take the time to reencode them in a lesser resolution to take them somewhere. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wana10]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[and in other news, Oranges grow on different trees than Apples.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[inteller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 10:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[that's why people like xp on atom machines better!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 10:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Android on a netbook?  Might as well use Linux ... no thanx ... windows 7 tears it up on my Dell Mini ... why would a want a o/s with such limited features like Android or Linux?<br><br>Windows 7 Starter is going to be on every netbook by the end of 2009 ... let me rephrase that ... "every netbook that people will actually buy and want."  <br><br>Although i'm sure Palm is going to scale Web o/s to a netbook so who knows ....  Palm got it's geek cred back and is now #2 in "mindshare" behind the iCrapPhone.  Their Web O/S netbook will probably be a minor sucess.  But Android?  not going to happen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darthgault]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 10:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm.. that was stupid, we all know at least one netbook with Android (and release date in 2009), let me rephrase that; at least one netbook with Android.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jakob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is not fair<br>android should be compared with windows mobile not windows 7]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ahmad mushtaq]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 2:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like the market finds Android in smartbooks as a viable solution to the MS problem in netbooks. I'm all for it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FoxKenji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[quote:<br>"Looks like the market finds Android in smartbooks as a viable solution to the MS problem in netbooks. I'm all for it."<br><br>MS problem?  What MS problem?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darthgault]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[This problem?<br><br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/22/microsoft-publishes-maximum-windows-7-netbooks-specs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/22/microsoft-publishes-maximum-windows-7-netbooks-specs/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andir3.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Android is a dead O/S.  Attempts to port it to mainstream Netbooks or devices will fail...  unless they learn to handle it differently than Linux and until Google starts supporting it on devices.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Rainey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Android-based smartbooks/netbooks are likely to be VERY popular with mobile operators, because they will be able to generate revenue from:<br><br>1. data contracts.<br>2. phone calls & SMS/MMS.<br>3. app purchases (e.g. operators get a cut from Android Market app sales).<br>4. value-added apps & services that leverage the capabilities of these "smartphone-like" devices.<br><br>Much like smartphones, Android-based smartbooks/netbooks are likely to usher in the era of inexpensive/free computing devices, in exchange for always-on, wireless data subscriptions.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HereAndNow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[No unibrows allowed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oliver hart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[More like Microsoft ain't paying us to say positive things about them, so we'll just speak the truth!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maddy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Amazing Grace How Sweet the Sound . . .<br><br>(that saved a wretch like me)<br><br>I once was lost but now I'm found,<br><br>Was Blind, but Now I SEEEEEEEEEEE.<br><br>iPhone 3G S is coming soon to a pocket near me.<br><br>JoeL<br>Atlanta]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jjoeldm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 2:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gartner: Android on ARM "more snappy" than Windows 7 on Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/gartner-android-on-arm-more-snappy-than-windows-7-on-atom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Living as we are, in the season of predictions, here's one from me:<br>Google will soon launch a Android 2.0, optimized for ARM, with support for multi-touch, built-in Chrome and other google baddies (= erstwhile goodies), and offer it on a platter to ODMs in Taiwan. Meanwhile Wintel will up the ante, although with Intel's recent interest in Windriver, there are reasons to believe that the L word is moving closer to the Atom. Will it be the ARMs race or the Atom bomb that will win? IMO, this will be decided largely by the ODMs - they will play the king maker, although the battle between ARM and Atom will likely stretch for no less than another year or so....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ah-palin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:10PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
