<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just got this camera last week. I love it. Great picture quality, and small enough for me to take anywhere. Low light isn't THAT impressive but it's still loads better than my last camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MaskingTape]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[What Engadget Forget to mention is that the ZS3 is the only camera available that record in AVCHD format (No 2GB file limit-Better Picture Quality/Higher frame rate/ and less space taken to save the files)<br><br>Plus Auto focus+Optical Zoom is available during video unlike canon and almost every other company<br>Also it record High quality Audio in stereo during videos<br><br>Also its sensor is 12MP but it record in 10MP to keep the aspect ratio wide screen<br>If you go to Cnet/Image resource/etc or any professional website that focus at cameras they will tell you pretty much that ZS3 is the BEST compact camera in the market by a mile if you look at picture quality+Noise level but it have 2 problems <br><br>#1 no full manual control (you can still control ISO and etc but not everything)<br>#2 its expensive <br><br>and from me #3 try to buy it...... it been sold out for months lol no where to be bought even from panasonic themself<br>ZS3 is Camera+Camcorder combined without any sacrifice in any side of these too <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR House]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 3:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah it forgets to mention all things it did in fact mention, how about you read then judge and jabber?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 9:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe you should give this advice to yourself then?<br><br>They say the sensor is 10MP which is false , the sensor is 12MP but it capture in 10MP to save wide screen pictures<br>Also they say it have video quality "on par" with other compact cameras , which is false ZS3 have hand down the best video capture in compact camcorders , tell me how many compact cameras capture AVCHD videos ? NONE expect panasonic ZS3 and the T1 (Underwater panasonic camera) plus its 1280x720 60 FRAME with optical zoom+image stabilization+Auto focus and HIGH quality Stereo Audio , that's not on par with other cameras Actually the PAR is ZS3, compared to canon its low frame,no zoom+no auto focus during video with bad mono audio and old capture format that doesnt give the quality of the AVCHD format<br><br>Also Its saying it have not user friendly menus compared to the samsung SL820 which is misleading , Pro users wont have a problem with it and amateur users will use the auto mode which is according to pretty much every review is the BEST AI mode in any compact camera, the ZS3 is the successor of the TZ5 (Camera of the year for last year)<br><br>I can go on and on about whats wrong in there review, the video sample they have is so bad that doesnt show the zs3 Quality not the gimped down scaled pictures the camera been sold out since april everywhere , people who see real pictures and reviews can tell, unlike engadget review which make the zs3 Just another camera and they didn't even include it with there Best camera under 400$ review that they made a while ago<br>I guess Canon or someone else gave them some $$$]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR House]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 9:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Engadget, the body on this camera is not plastic... it's metal.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cassini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2009 11:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bought this camera 5 days ago. <br><br>It's magnificent.  People are blown away by the wide angle pictures. <br><br>HD quality is excellent, and sound quality is far better than I expected. <br><br>I bought it mostly so that I wouldn't have to lug two devices on vacation, and based on a discussion here at Engadget a couple of weeks ago.    Best serious purchase I have made in a long time. Thank you Engadget.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gylman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I had this on pre-order from buy.com on april 4th, they canceled the pre-order last week saying that they aren't going to get them in. Where can I find a reputable seller to buy from? Also, panasonic is doing a free 4gb SD card and camera case via rebate if purchased between like 05/somthing and june 24th I believe.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I got mine from JR.com (through Amazon.com), came in 2 days using the expedite shipping. Only had silver available though, but that might have changed. I wanted black so bad but whatever lol.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MaskingTape]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[try Vanns.com<br>I tried butterflyphoto but I couldnt get it on time for my trip.($380) I had it on order for 3 weeks, and it will still take at least another 2. I went to vanns this morning and will have it by Thursday as the Silver is in stock. ($400)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David F]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I got mine from amazon but it shipped through jr.com. Got it with 2 day shipping.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan C.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yay for double posting :-/ Sorry about that. Might even be quad posting because none of my posts were showing up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MaskingTape]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am interested in a new camera, but I am undecided between G10 and P90]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skasol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Picked one up a month or two ago; and amazing camera; great to hold me off till I get a proper slr (And then I still have quick point and shoot).<br><br>One thing to mention though; is at a recent NiN concert; I recorded a couple songs back to back; and maxed out ~12 minutes long in mpg mode( ~1.9gb recorded).  This is going to an 8gb sandisk xtremeIII card.  About 1-2 second pause before I could resume again; I am assuming this is a hard coded limit; but I have not looked into it (And I am also not on the newest firmware yet).<br><br>-Chris]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[wom, using motion jpeg has a 2gb limit.  Switch to AVCHD, no limit.  At least not on the ZS3.  I've heard that the TZ7 version may have some limits due to European law.  AVCHD looks better to me, and software is now widely available compared to just a few weeks ago.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TyMaYoJa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 3:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Are all those advertisements on the front removable? I'm not spending money on a camera and then be their billboard for ads. Back in the day, pro photographers used to tape over the name of the camera company to make their cameras more inobtrusive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, it's just a sticker for shelf display purposes. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[That trick still applies!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Isn't the main point of this camera that it's got 12x zoom in a compact, and that would be one of its main selling points?  So why recommend the SL820, when clearly they are catering for different needs?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not exactly fair to compare it to the Samsung SL820. The Samsung mentioned is only a 5X zoom...quite a bit away from the mega-zoom of this Panasonic. And for a 12X mega-zoom, this Panasonic is quite compact! Look at the other point and shoot mega-zooms out there.. most are more bulky..your own review of the Samsung  HZ15W  told of how bulky it was...Please, oranges to oranges here!<br>Plus, I looked at that picture at ISO 400 and didn't see any noise...perhaps if you compared that to other mega-zooms, you may not have noticed the noise as much.<br>Ed<br>web/gadget guru]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[To be fair, most new point-n-shoot cameras use more and more noise reduction as the ISO goes up -- so you won't see typical noise. But you do see a degradation of image quality at the pixel level. Look for yourself at this site (scroll down to the ISO tests), and you can see that the quality steadily degrades as the ISO goes up (look at how dark and solid the spade looks at the lowest ISO, but at 400 it's kinda of splotchy and faded).<br><br><a href="http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=3957&review=panasonic+lumix+zs3" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=3957&review=panasonic+lumix+zs3</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I ordered this jack-of-all-trades camera yesterday. Seemed like the best camera that is small, has a big zoom, good movie mode (including zoom during recording), and good sound (the previous incarnations of this Panasonic line appear to suffer from poor sound quality). Wish it was cheaper, but oh well...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess I don't understand why anyone would spend $400+ on a point-and-shoot. Just spend $100 more and get the last-generation Canon DSLR. I guess the only argument would be video, but you'd be better off getting a consumer flash-based HD camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hexydes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because you can take this anywhere and a DSLR requires a backpack for all the gear you need to take along.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have an SLR too, but who wants to drag it (and big lenses) around everywhere? I can bring this camera with me at all times. Not to mention, you can usually bring a point-n-shoot to a concert, but not an SLR. The whole point you're missing is, this is a small, portable camera!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Exactly.  DLSRs are big and chunky.  In fact, they're also generally more delicate and prone to being made temporarily useless if you get dirt in the body while changing lenses.<br>Saying that we should all spend the extra on a mediocre DSLR over a high-end P&S is like saying that I should take a large powerboat camping in the interior instead of a nice, light canoe.  It's all about having the right tool for the job.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jorvay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[most people who have dslrs have 2nd multipurpose cams as to not having to lug around the loads of glass with them...  wish panasonic added some manual capability similar to Nikon's S710...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xconan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 1:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've a DSLR and a pack of lenses.   No matter which way I turn them, they just don't fit in my pocket.<br><br>The ZS3/TZ7 is for an entirely different situation.  I really can't afford it but bought it anyway.  No regrets.  The 25mm wide end produces brilliant landscape/sunset/scenic photos.  The stablization works very, very well at 300mm.  I will use both in the matter of 30 seconds when I'm outdoors and the IQ is excellent.<br><br>I'm using video more than I expected, not available with my DSLR.  <br><br>Different tools for different jobs.  As usual.<br><br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[geoffrey.langlois]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 11:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Panasonic has been making great cameras of late. They fixed the noise issues of the past and now treat it better than most of the competition, even better than the 'big 2' of Canon and Nikon in the P&S arena.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe Engadget should try using some PC video editing software, as 90% of video editing software on a PC works natively with AVCHD, so no conversion needed to be able to edit it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheLostSwede]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Final Cut Pro will import AVCHD no worries too. Log and Capture. Did it myself the other day from my own ZS3. Very happy. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cliff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is not a "normal" version of AVCHD, it's AVCHD-Lite which is not widely supported on Mac or PC yet.  On top of that I heard Panasonic was doing something strange and breaking the AVCHD-Lite file up into lots of small chuncks...I think 20MB each?  I can't find the review I read this in, so I might be slightly off.  The good news for Mac owners is iMovie 8.0.3 update has added support for this file format.  I have not tried it yet, so I'd love to know if anyone else has tried it and their thoughts?  <br>I actually want the Panasonic DMC-TS1 which is rugged and waterproof version.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 10:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't have this camera, but a friend of mine bought it for a trip that we took to an Art & Wine Festival. We had gone to dinner at a sushi bar (was very dim inside), and I had tried using the camera to take a picture of the restaurant's logo printed on the front of the menu cover. Using the exposure compensation settings @ +2, it didn't look any different than @ +0. However it did get significantly darker when I changed it to -2. It might be due to the camera itself and overall just the fact that the place was dark so the camera could not capture enough light *HOWEVER* on the camera's screen it looked perfectly bright @ +2, but upon taking the picture, as mentioned previously, it was dim and looked the same @ +0. Very strange. Overall though the camera is great. Motor noise is a minimum, and it takes pictures very nicely, even with macro.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[acaurora]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[No mention of maximum aperture in the article and the photo of the front of the camera washes out the number.<br>Here it is:  F3.3 - F4.9.  For $400, I'd rather add on a little bit more money and get the LX3 (which still seems to be difficult to find in stock).  Unless you absolutely need 12x zoom, the LX3 is a far better camera.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hahn73]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree, but clearly, this camera is for people who want a big zoom, as opposed to the LX-3, which has one of the smallest zoom factors I've seen. Also, if you really want to use the camera for videos, I've read the LX-3 sound quality is poor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have this camera since a month too, this is the best camera in the point and shoot scene. I have a Canon EoS 40d and I bought this for my wife, I couldn't help borrowing this from her from time to time for the video and for certain wide angle shots that I just wanted to quickly take.<br><br>The HD vide is crystal clear, on a mac only VLC is able to play the files but the camera ships with HDMI cables which you can connect to a TV and be amazed by the quality of picture.<br><br>To the above comment on going for  a Leica , $400 is a stretch so adding $100 is definitely out of the picture, besides 12x zoom can come super handy in some situations. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vijay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd consider this, I tried the SL820 and was seriously unimpressed with the poor quality control buttons on the back of the camera.  Selecting 'up' using the four way control was almost impossible.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[merlin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 11:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[focal length range is nice.  but at this price, does this camera even have an optical viewfinderr?  I couldn't tell.  but lack of one would be a deal-killer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rtdunham]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Consider your deal killed.  This one is screen-only.  Though technically there are no P&S cameras with true "optical view finders."  That's the whole point of an SLR mechanism.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jorvay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not sure what you mean by "true optical viewfinder" (unless you mean SLR through-the-lens viewing) but there are plenty of point-n-shoots at all price points with optical viewfinders. The point being, people can't always see an LCD screen in bright light, in which case any optical viewfinder is desired... Plus, some people just prefer looking through a viewfinder.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2009 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where is everyone purchasing this camera?  It seems most places are out of stock (bh, abes of maine, etc.)  6ave does seem to sell black and blue through amazon.com, but they charge tax for those that live in NY.<br><br>Does anyone know where in NYC one can take a look at this camera before purchasing?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimps]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[J&R has the Camera to look at and purchase i think. i was there the other day.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zorojr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 8:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've had this camera for about a month.  I love it.  I had a larger camera for years but really enjoy the smaller format.<br><br>Low light pictures are a little inconsistent but not if it sees a face.  If it locks on to a face the low-light picture couldn't be better.<br><br>The movie's are super on my Samsung 52" LCD.  A mini HDMI cable is not included so I had to get one of those.  The software in the camera makes playing slide shows and video to the TV very easy.<br><br>Worth the $400 in my opinion with the 12X zoom and 720p zoom movie mode.  Wide angle shots are awesome too!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its a 12 Megapixel CMOS not a 10.1. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thearchitects]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is that video good quality by today's P&S standards?  It seems rather choppy and poor quality to me, but I'm not sure if it's the  delivery mechanism or what...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[For a point-and-shoot camera it's pretty good. It's only 720p video, but better that most non-hd camcorders on the market. If you want something for shooting HD video really well, then get a camcorder, this is excellent for this kind of camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 2:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[The sample video on this site is not very representative.<br><br>Here is a better example of some video done with the TZ7 (aka ZS3)<br><br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-wOEP_M0Sg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-wOEP_M0Sg</a><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TyMaYoJa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's better than SD camcorders, not quite as sharp as hd camcorders.  The autofocus is great, the zoom is slower than a typical camcorder and slower than the zoom during photo mode.  In short, it's pretty awesome quality.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 4:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[The color and clarity of the sushi video that TyMaYoJa posted (thanks!) was good, but panning the camera and moving object seemed jumpy to me.  Is that how the original video really looked?<br><br>If I wanna record bits and pieces of a soccer game and not see this jumpy motion... can i buy this camera, or do I still need to get a "real camcoder"?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 4:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bob,<br>I just watched the youtube link.  I see the jumpy video that you're talking about.  I don't know what is causing it, but the video from the camera loaded on to your computer is not jumpy at all.  It's completely smooth and awesome.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 5:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/panasonic-dmc-zs3-hands-on-and-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have it since two weeks and made all the computex shoots and videos for my website with that cam. It is great, The battery life lastet for a whole day point and shooting which was around 300 pictures and 20 minute video. <br>You can check out my pictures and video on flickr.com/photos/ndevil and youtube.com/ndeviltv to see more quality comparisons.<br>I recommend it to everyone and don't worry about the price. The cam costs here in Taiwan 12000 NT which would be arcutally even less than those 400 dollars, so there is some space for price dropping.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darkpros]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2009 12:40PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
