<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is sooo pointless]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Mensah]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 7:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not at all pointless.  I get decent reception most places except in my office.  This would fix that.<br><br>My big question is whether or not this device will work for all 3G networks (ie, work for T-mobile), or if it is somehow limited to AT&T only?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CityZen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 12:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[personally, i'd rather just have a good carrier that invests in more infrastructure to give me service in more places than one that sells me another service to give me what i'm already paying for.<br><br>yes, i know its impossible to ask for "more bars in all places," but i have to pay the monthly bill regardless if i get reception in the office or not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 26th 2009 1:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[hmm, it sounds to me like they saved some money by building a cheaper wireless network with a poorer signal and now they want to charge users some extra money for the signal that should have been there in the first place.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[G]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 7:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[Exactly. Buy your own infrastructure, route your calls through your own network connection, and yet still pay a monthly line rental and get charged for those calls.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TimmyRaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds about right for AT&T.<br><br>Counting down the days till my contract expires in September (from original iPhone....why did I have a contract again?)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SpaceGoatPriest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 9:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[My thoughts exactly.....<br><br>Ive been with Att wireless( well bellsouth, then cingular)  since the late 90's and ive seen the new tech come, improve wireless service, and about when the iphone came out, ive noticed a downhill slope of the quality and reliability of ATT service(im not blaming it on the iphone, im blaming it on att). I usually only have about 2 or 3 bars of signal most of the time in the houston area. My calls are dropped, crappy sounds sometimes when the call is connected, and 3g service that used to be rock solid, is very spotty around the city.... ATT get your shit together. I dont want to buy more eqiupment to make my service better. You should make it work in my house better, not me having to buy a freaking repeater....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kastonie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 10:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[test]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10minutehobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 7:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[It didn't work.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TimmyRaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[Are these microcells meant to be available to anyone within range, or restricted to the owner?<br><br>With the way phones are improving, it seems that the ability to automatically switch to VOIP (via WiFi) would be more cost effective.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dizigel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am certain it is greed that is keeping us from having that right now.  There is no reason we can not have our phone use VOIP when on WiFi at home when we have NO BARS in our house.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Saltboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Saltboy -- Nokia E71, service with ATT, and I'm on VoIP in the house. My phone automatically switches whenever I'm in range of unlocked wifi. It isn't that the technology doesn't exist. It isn't even that they don't want you to have it. It is that iPhones don't want you to have it. Sure, they blame it on ATT, but I'm on ATT and have it with a different phone brand. Therefore, iPhone is the reason, not ATT.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jenni665]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 9:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[From what I've read you can restrict it to selected phones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Le Big Mac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOL! I like how iPhone FB's complain about coverage when the schlub next to them with the $50 Samsung has no such problem. Before you complain about coverage, pop your SIM in a different phone (or 2) and conduct your own informal test. More times than none you will be surprised by what you find. Just sayin...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankenstein Black]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 10:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Frank...<br><br>I get exactly the same service from my Motorola V3xx as I do with my new iPhone 3G[S]<br><br>I am far from an iPhone FB, but it is nice for many reasons and lacking in others.  I am pleased with it, just not with the service I get at my house with AT&T (or any carrier as I have fam and friends with various carriers getting the same issues there)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Saltboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[stupid. <br><br>but for anyone who NEEDS this, you should have checked coverage in your area and got a phone accordingly. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[Or, we can get this, and go with the carrier / device that we prefer.<br><br>Although if AT&T wants to charge a monthly fee for this, I'll probably just continue to do my calls from the back porch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[How do you do that?  All carrier maps show full coverage where my house is, and NONE of them get better than a bar, two on a good day, at my house.<br><br>Should we all make sure we have a friend on each carrier, then have them over during the times I would like to be on the phone and see what kind of service they are getting?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Saltboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually.....my house is in the central Austin 10 minutes from downtown and at my house due to the hill which side it sits upon and the metal roof the house has, there is effectively no signal whatsoever inside, FORM ANY CARRIER. I'd be tempted to get this or a zBoost. As it is if I don't remember to put my phone in plane mode it loses 50% of its charge. within a few hours . Yeah....the metal roof sounded great when I decided to have it installed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shoulda woulda did.  Then I moved.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dawtips]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 9:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[Obviously, we didn't know about the metal-roof dead zone problem.  My husband is a product researcher par excellance and still didn't find anything out about this before we got the service.  This isn't just an AT&T problem; apparently cell signals just don't get through for anyone with a metal roof.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kristaphi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 24th 2009 8:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[The coverage shows my home covered by 3G for a good 25 mile radius, and yet I can't get a signal until I get out to the street.<br>Seriously, AT&T should GIVE people the Microcells if we're paying for their damn service. The iPhone isn't worth this, going to move back to Verizon when my contract is up]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 27th 2009 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[If I see another post which mentions iPhone I'll definitely puke. Since it's lunch 80% of the posts are directly or indirectly written for iPhone. So for the majority of people who can't afford one, these past few days Engadget was useless. <br>Are you guys paid from Apple? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iacovosf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[You'd always bias an article like this towards whatever big phones are out, and since the iPhone is the only "big phone" you can get on the carrier in question in this article (AT&T), then it makes sense. Since the Pre or N97 isn't available on AT&T yet, there'd be no point mentioning them.<br><br>Bloody conspiracy nut.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TimmyRaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm pretty sure you mean "launch" and not "lunch", and I'd like to see some actual data to back up the 80% number you threw out there.  Are you counting actual articles, or links to other's articles?  Are you counting a Zune or G1 article that mentions the iPhone in a comparison?  Are you counting articles about Apple in general?  What is the basis for your calculation?<br><br>Can't we just say "a lot of" or "most of what I read" instead of tossing any percent you find appropriate up on the web as gospel?  This is engadget, not Fox News.<br><br>You know, I read somewhere that 72% of all statistics are made up?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[Our office has AWFUL AT&T coverage for some reason, so I'd love to get one of these in our building.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[technabob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[My office has awesome AT&T coverage, max bars no matter where I go. Now when I'm at home...lets just say this would be a big help, either that or Verizon or Sprint picking up the iPhone :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[I want one of these for traveling I've found myself in hotels and relatives homes alike with little or no signal. While i have full service at home it'll be nice to have  the equipment if/when needed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just got my iPhone 3G S yesterday and it's amazing.  I love this phone. No really I do. It's just perfect. I don't care what all the Pre owners are going on about but the fact that I can combine my iPod and my phone like this is just simply awesome.<br><br>As for AT&T I get excellent service once I step out the apartment and everywhere around here. And at work I get full 5 bars.  But yeah inside it's a lil weak.  <br><br>On principal I don't like the idea of paying extra for better service/coverage inside my own home but in the end it depends on how expensive it is and if it actually works.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheLionOfAzzalle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[They should give these away at next to nothing (I'm thinking like $50) and charge NOTHING for the use of it monthly as long as you have an ATT plan with data.  I can justify this by saying that it will offload more than enough bandwidth while in range to compensate ATT for any perceived loss in monthly revenue.  I do however see Time Warner/Comcast etc. starting some shit here as their pipes will now bear the burden of these femtocells.  Pair that with TW/Comcast's recent decision to try to push tiered plans and you can see this is a WIN WIN for all greedy bastards involved.  ATT unloads it's users to cable, and cable is more than willing to charge you out the ass for more usage than "normal".  This will become important once LTE is deployed since there will no longer be an effective difference between data and voice since ATT will lose the ability to rip you off for unused minutes, overage minutes and nights and weekends will fail to exist.  In fact several articles have suggested that ATT really doesn't know how they are going to price services with LTE.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jsjohnson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 9:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd pay a couple hundred bucks for the hardware as long as I don't have to pay a monthly charge. I don't know how cell companies can get away with charging users monthly to use their own broadband connection.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RyanTV]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 9:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[I second that.  I could afford the monthly fee, but I would feel dirty for paying it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 9:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's clear that they're simply looking at this as a revenue generator, and not as a way to improve their service.<br><br>Jesus, for $100/month, THEY should be the ones beefing up the infrastructure around peoples' houses, at no additional cost to the consumer.<br><br>I just don't understand this new paradigm.  Oh yeah, fuck AT&T.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crawdad689]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 9:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am really sorry for you folks in the US . Here in Europe if the carrier can't delliver a good signal at the address for witch the contract is for ( each one's home ) , you can  end the contract . Also the signal is a lot better than most US (in city arreas there basicaly aren't areas without coverage , also on the most used routes between cities , only in remote areas there isn't signal for at least a voice call >> not talking about HSPA coverage here as this is understandable smaller)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[me_iauras]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 12:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's true only because European countries are the size of some people's houses here in the states. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Turner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 10:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, in the US you can get out of your contract if you cannot get a signal in your home. If the company is aware of the dead spot, it's pretty easy. But if they claim there is service there it's your burden to prove otherwise. I'm surprised most people don't know things like this. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ryan.moore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 1:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why didn't they just add UMA to their phones and people can use any regular wifi networks. That would take a load off voice and data from the towers , correct? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 10:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is essentially doing that.  The box connects to your home network, and creates a "cell tower" in your home.  At that point the phone just connects to it, instead of the "real" towers.<br><br>Going about it this way is actually cheaper.  Buy the device once(the femtocell box), and it will work with any phone from that carrier/technology.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SpaceGoatPriest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 10:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ignore all this patronising-wally-talk from us European subscribers.<br><br>At best, 3G coverage is around 27% (in the UK; Germany and France come next at around 21% and 17% respectively) so all this talk about better service is a lot of NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) baloney designed to make us feel good, or at least better than others.<br><br>The truth of the matter is that the widespread global use of the iPhone as an email/web-surfing/ app-using data cruncher is starting to show up the cellular networks all over the world for what they are - in dire need of evolutionary upgrade for the next generation of corporate and consumer usage.<br><br>We are simply witnessing the birth-pangs of that evolution, and nowhere more so that the AT&T network in the USA, which is where it started with their momentous decision to do a deal with Steve Jobs & Co and pave the way for their vision of the future.<br><br>Make no mistake, RIM, Samsung, HTC, LG with Symbian, Windows, Google and others will not always be far behind with their offerings to match the iPhone revolution, and before long all the invective and abuse directed at AT&T will be repeated at Verizon, Sprint, T-mobile, O2, Orange and various carriers round the globe UNLESS they anticipate the future and get with the program of creating a proper infrastructure to carry the projected usage of the coming years.<br><br>To be forewarned is to be fore-armed...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[airmanchairman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is the best post here.  Perfect!  + for you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[absolutc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[If the carrier you use has a lousy signal inside your house - you really should get a different carrier.   I dropped Verizon for AT&T because the Verizon signal sucked inside my house.  I now get 5 bars with AT&T even in the basement, instead of having to stand at one particular window just to pick up my voice-mail.  I am sure there are some people out there that are locked into a carrier because of work or get no cell service at all, but most people living in major population centers shouldn't need one of these things.  <br><br>Given that AT&T gets most of the benefits from these boxes (moving data off their network & not having to build out additional towers to serve you), they ought to practically give them away at cost.  Nobody is going to pay a monthly fee for one of these.  It should be a one-time, modest charge.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rufus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 12:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yea ,isn't that like mine is bigger argument .<br>The point is that the whole EU(not talking about specific contries) is roughly the same size and only the EU has about 400 mil citizens , and it has better coverage than the US . That is because we're a bunch of  "communists" who actualy enjoy our corporations to be regulated by goverment , so that in turn these corporations don't f@#k us .<br>That's ok you kep on defending AT&T/Verizon/Sprint etc. from the regulatory organisms since they bring you so much Joy and Happiness]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[me_iauras]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[there's gotta be a better solution than this, that won't cost the end consumer more money, to get better 3g reception.  i mean there are a million telephone poles out there.  why not stick some signal amplifiers on some of them and expand the network that way?  this would especially help in those areas where the cities, such as my backward ass city, don't want eyesores such as cellphone towers all over the place.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[I know they are going to charge a fee for this, which makes me crazy. What ever happened to that MagicJack "MagicCell" femtocell with all those insane bells-and-whistles? Was that pie in the sky talk or are they in a bunker somewhere perfecting it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Valicore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 12:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[testing one two, how do I change my commenting password?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy W]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 12:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[By putting a cell tower inside out homes wont we be turning them into mini cChernobyls lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fuckatt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 1:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[Having no reception with any major carrier (I've tried them all) I'm at this point willing to do anything to get a phone working in my apartment. I find skype to be just as unreliable with many dropped calls over wifi. I'm really curious about the price point. If it's $200 plus a monthly fee then it will be more beneficial to go with a VOIP service that drops calls than to have AT&T continue to pull blood from my veins. Also, I'm concerned about what happens when I'm on a call with the microcell then I have to leave my apartment to go some place else. With AT&T's track record I imagine they will make that difficult.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 2:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[STOP SAYING TO SWITCH CARRIERS. There are a lot of places that don't have more than a bar or two from ANY CARRIER.<br><br>The MicroCell on it's own would be a good product, but compared to the other options AT&T could have used, it really SUCKS.<br><br>The best system is UMA, and AT&T should have used UMA. UMA works on any wifi network, not just at the user's home. Devices like the Blackberry 8900 can connect to even enterprise level wireless networks, like those that are used at universities.<br><br>Also, you can cover a LOT more than 5,000 square feet with wifi, as a good wifi setup can cover a few hundred feet, and much more with multiple AP's, effectively building a small cell network, just with a different technology.<br><br>Secondly, devices like the 8900 that have UMA, but not 3G are being excluded with this device. Of course the opposite is also true, so the best answer may ultimately  be for AT&T to offer both systems.<br><br>The other system that has been in use for years are GSM repeaters. While they wouldn't work in an area that has no signal at all, using an outdoor and an indoor antenna, they can boost the signal from one bar outside to five inside. This would work in 95% of locations, and would work with other's phones, since you are still using the cell phone network as an intermediate level backhaul.<br><br>This device combines the disadvantages of both systems, with no additional advantages that a repeater cannot offer for 95% of users.<br><br>The reason that this cannot be used outside of the US is not because AT&T is a bunch of money-guzzling corporate monsters (they are, but that's not the reason in this case), its because other countries use different frequencies, and this device could cause interference if used overseas. This is another advantage of UMA, as UMA is just wifi, which is used worldwide.<br><br>It's not that they cheaped  out on the network, at least not in this case. There are many places that get no more than one bar from any network. This is the nature of cell networks and buildings.<br><br>AT&T's 3G network sucks, but the 2G is rock solid, at least in my experience. I am staying on 2G for a while.<br><br>They had better not charge a monthly fee. It would be nice if they offered an unlimited plan like T-mo's UMA plan. Of course, it would also be nice if they would turn on UMA. Even without any freebie minutes, it would make the network so much bigger with a relatively tiny investment.<br><br>The N97 is on AT&T (and T-mo) since it is GSM unlocked.<br><br>To those of you who are complaining about the iPhone or some other AT&T device, get a Nokia. They outperform the other brands, especially in the fringe and deep fringe, where they will often hold onto a call with good quality where another phone won't place a call at all.<br><br>This isn't going to create enough internet traffic to be a problem. Even a family using 1200 minutes a month would only be using about 1GB, which is nothing.<br><br>This isn't going to significantly offload data, as users would just use wifi, as all of the data centric devices like iPhone, E71, and BB Bold have wifi.<br><br>They may sell this at a loss in order to encourage people to use more minutes and take traffic off of their network. Of course, it would be nice if they would implement UMA, which would cost the user nothing, as everyone already has wifi.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 25th 2009 8:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T's 3G MicroCell still on track for release sometime before the end of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/atandts-3g-microcell-still-on-track-for-release-sometime-before-t/</guid><description><![CDATA[Amazing, AT&T now suckers people into putting cell sites in their homes AND charge the user for the privelege of relieving AT&T of their responsibility to install and maintain infrastructure.  Brilliant.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 2nd 2009 3:13PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
