<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's a start! I remember when we hit 1mhz everybody thought that was not possible same with Megabytes]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nvidiagtx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Starting back from Slot processors that is!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[did it disappear into an alternate reality?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[When Xbox gets Quantum Processing, suddenly people will experience an INFINITE NUMBER OF RED RINGS OF DEATH]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Quantumphysics]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 10:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Quantumphysics <br>Dont we already?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Brown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 10:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is one of the first articles that i've read on engadget in a long long time where i just thought "wtf" after finishing. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SimbaDogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 12:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[@simbadogg<br><br>Really, this is the first one? You must be new here....<br><br>A little hint: Engadget is like a really hot diseased whore. You know she's giving you the clap and probably 9 levels of AIDS, but damn she's hot. Why do you stay with her? All she talks about is frickin Apple news! You don't know, but you do stay....you do stay...and you find yourself saying WTF a lot to the things she says....maybe it's that her being so dumb is a turn on, knowing you're so much better than her.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sotec_productions]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 12:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[he has a strange growth on his waist, under his left arm.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow I was hoping that they would say something like, "Why is this picture related to the article?" I guess Engadget is going gay. Sad. Just kidding lol.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sk8ordie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 3:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is a really misleading story. People have done quantum computations before with more q-bits, and people have built q-bits with vastly greater coherence times than the one's in the article.<br><br>The real claim is that this is the first all solid-state quantum computation.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JonyEpsilon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Proof? Links?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Aaron  Do your own research! Try googling: there are many established results and they should be easy to find. If you're interested in getting someone else to boil-down physics developments for you might I suggest you sign up to the excellent, and free, APS Physics bulletin <a href="http://physics.aps.org/" rel="nofollow">http://physics.aps.org/</a> .]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[I didn't make the claim, the burden of proof is on Jony.  If I was really interested in figuring that out I'd look for it, but I'm just questioning whether Jony here is talking BS or actually knows something.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 1:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's a blog not a court: there is no "burden of proof"!<br><br>Anyway, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and imagine that you really are interested in physics and not just some awkward internet type ...<br><br>The NMR people have been doing computation for a long time now on systems with more than two bits. There was a famous paper by Ike Chuang in 2001 that implemented a real search algorithm on an NMR quantum computer. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2F414883a" rel="nofollow">http://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2F414883a</a> . I'm pretty sure there were others before that with smaller computations but off the top of my head I can't point you to links. Nobody has figured out how to scale NMR beyond a few bits, for various pretty fundamental reasons.<br><br>Looking to other technologies that can get round this limitation, the leader is probably strings of trapped, laser cooled ions. There are two powerhouse groups: Rainer Blatt's group in Innsbruck , and the group of Dave Wineland at NIST (<a href="http://tf.nist.gov/ion/qucomp/papers.htm" rel="nofollow">http://tf.nist.gov/ion/qucomp/papers.htm</a>). They've both managed to entangle long strings of ions (8 I think is the record). There's a review here <a href="http://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/2284.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/2284.pdf</a> .<br><br>Coherence times for trapped ions are vastly longer than those for solid state systems, including the one reported above. Amazingly, optical coherences of greater than one second have been observed in these systems by encoding the q-bit in a dechorence free subspace of a pair of ions (see below). Hyperfine coherences can be much longer than this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JonyEpsilon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 2:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[That final link: <a href="http://heart-c704.uibk.ac.at/publications/papers/prl04_roos.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://heart-c704.uibk.ac.at/publications/papers/prl04_roos.pdf</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JonyEpsilon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 2:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[tits or gtfo]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kinger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 3:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not that misleading. I have Incandescent light bulbs that have outlasted 80% of the XBOX 360's ever made. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII (BarCODE)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 7:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seems microsoft stays ahead... if they can manage to make the xbox last longer than couple of days this will get fixed in no time... :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gadget freak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Zing!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nukee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Right click image<br>Click AdBlock Image ...<br>Select the radio button to block scott-bakula-quantum-processor-20090629-2.jpg<br>Click Add filter<br>Pray that the few seconds you looked at it will not give you nightmares]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NateDog]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh, come on.  He's HOT (for his age)...<br><br>I certainly wouldn't kick him out of bed.  ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd hit him...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheng]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 11:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would too. Just not the way YOU meant it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NHAnimator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 12:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well I'm pretty sure he meant hit him physically in a striking force, so I'm guessing you're suggesting otherwise.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 1:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Way to misrepresent the actual accomplishment, Engadget. Also, a quantum bit is called a qubit, not a qbit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vivek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Doesn't matter as long as it conveys the point. <a href="http://www.bradrubin.com/Site/Blog/Entries/2009/1/16_Qubit_or_Qbit.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bradrubin.com/Site/Blog/Entries/2009/1/16_Qubit_or_Qbit.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zane]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Unless you're Q-Bert]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Agent .25i]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[WHAT THE ... ? MY EYES!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zane]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[HAHAAH<br><br><br>Isnt that Hasselhof's pic with the quantum leap guys face photoshoped in there? LMAO<br><br>thats is one funny picture.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cg006]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[That Blake Johnson sure is a hot stud. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JMC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[*$&#!!!<br><br>I was reading Engadget at a public cafe!  Forget whether or not it makes me look gay - it makes me look gay for Scott Friggin Bakula!!!1!  I could do better!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Crexis =NX=]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Awwwfuc. Ive been half body fro'd!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Agent .25i]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I the only one who recognises him as Cpt Archer?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[moje]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[ooooh captain!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[james]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[or Chuck's dad (aka Orion)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htowngator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[no , its not captain archer, its the guy from quantum leap. same actor, different chrachter. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sinjinn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 10:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[*facepalm*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 10:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh boy. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 30th 2009 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't forget that Captain Archer saved planet Earth!!!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zephxiii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 4:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, I only recognize him as The Bakula Debacle]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 3:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[mmmm... T'Pol.<br><br>You so know Archer wanted to hit that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 8:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah, the 70s and 80s... When chest hair was still cool. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htowngator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't know about all of that... I still think your mom is cool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[benderillo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[A quick mutation has stopped all chest hair growage?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pretol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 30th 2009 2:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[SO HOT!!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheLionOfAzzalle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thank God nobody rushed in while I was reading it :p]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iacovosf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's amazing how close we are coming to all sorts of tech like this. Even more amazing is how in the year 2009, Microsoft still can't figure out how to build something that doesn't crash and burn (literally).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hpowell9451]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 9:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone else wonder why Yale University invested in taking pictures of a shirtless Scott Bakula?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Asten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 10:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[And by "actually does calculations" you mean they were testing out Crysis on it....... Its ok you can come clean.......]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hackettman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/first-functional-quantum-processor-created-lasted-slightly-long/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, and they were able to get 1,000,000 FPS! <br><br>Unfortunately, it was unplayable- <br><br>as they only ended up with 1 frame and then had to send it in to get refurbished.. (in their own box, no less!)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NoAndThen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 11:41AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
