<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Supreme Court declines to hear remote storage DVR appeal, cloud recording is on the way</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/supreme-court-declines-to-hear-remote-storage-dvr-appeal-cloud/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Supreme Court declines to hear remote storage DVR appeal, cloud recording is on the way</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Supreme Court declines to hear remote storage DVR appeal, cloud recording is on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/supreme-court-declines-to-hear-remote-storage-dvr-appeal-cloud/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/supreme-court-declines-to-hear-remote-storage-dvr-appeal-cloud/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you forget to record it, even with the RS-DVR you're SOL.  The whole argument was that each customer got their own hard drive space for recordings and you had to set up and watch your recording.  There is no master recording to share are you can't access someone elses recording.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 2:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Supreme Court declines to hear remote storage DVR appeal, cloud recording is on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/supreme-court-declines-to-hear-remote-storage-dvr-appeal-cloud/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/supreme-court-declines-to-hear-remote-storage-dvr-appeal-cloud/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think Engadget is more about "smarmy" than "facts". ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dslate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2009 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Supreme Court declines to hear remote storage DVR appeal, cloud recording is on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/supreme-court-declines-to-hear-remote-storage-dvr-appeal-cloud/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/supreme-court-declines-to-hear-remote-storage-dvr-appeal-cloud/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good ruling.  Nice that all those media company guys that joined the Obama administration came out on the other side, at least this time.<br><br>So "fair use" has some grounding.  DVRs are legal.  Tivo is legal.  Network DVRs that are logically identical to DVRs (individual recordings commanded by customer, individual copies stored, etc) are legal.<br><br>We'll see how this progresses.  First Cablevision has to deploy what they've been arguing for.  Then we'll see how that deployment goes.  Then Cablevision will comment on their cost savings.  Then maybe other MSOs will talk about deploying the same thing.  <br><br>Then... maybe Cablevision will on its own start talking about a version that doesn't store individual copies, and makes the whole thing more scalable.  Will the media companies sue again?  Would they win or lose this time?  What if the file system still has individual directories with "soft links" to the master copy, or just treats all of this as some form of "directory compression".  Eventually, Cablevision will get this ruled legal.  <br><br>And maybe recording things you didn't ask for, but might like comes along soon.  Then recording everything, and allowing you access to all of it.<br><br>It will take Y-E-A-R-S, but eventually, this will be a significant step vs. your private DVR.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fanfoot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 30th 2009 12:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Supreme Court declines to hear remote storage DVR appeal, cloud recording is on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/supreme-court-declines-to-hear-remote-storage-dvr-appeal-cloud/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/supreme-court-declines-to-hear-remote-storage-dvr-appeal-cloud/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court's denial of Cert does not constitute a ruling-they don't want to hear the case because there is no constitutional issue involved. This isn't a dead point, the studios could file again next week. Just pointing out: not a ruling and certainly not settled.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 30th 2009 7:13PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
