http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/ Engadget Comments for Micron's smaller NAND chips mean more, faster flash memory in the same old enclosures http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/During the holidays or early next year?
I wanna wait for windows 7 sp1 but im not sure when computers are cheapest]]>Jun 30th 2009 7:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/And don't buy SSD, you don't need it :P]]>Jun 30th 2009 8:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 8:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/
Oh, and i'm not convinced that it's always cheapest to build yourself. It's certainly more fun, and you'll be able to get exactly what you want, but I suspect that in the low end (£250-£350 or whatever the dollar equivalent is) it might be cheaper to go with an OEM.]]>Jun 30th 2009 8:19AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/
What you also have to understand is that NO MATTER WHAT TIME OF THE YEAR YOU MAKE A PURCHASE, there will ALWAYS be a better deal/PC on the market within 3/4 months. its a GUARANTEE. Only thing you can do to counter this is make sure that you are satisfied with your purchase (aka don't shortcut yourself just cuz you don't have the money, etc)]]>Jun 30th 2009 8:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/It's fun and exciting to build a computer.]]>Jun 30th 2009 8:50AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 9:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 9:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 2:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 8:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 8:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 11:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 8:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 8:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 8:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 8:26AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 8:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 8:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 8:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 12:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/"it takes less static than your skin can feel to permanently fry a chipset, and sometimes electrostatic damage doesn't show signs until a few months down the road, as in when you're working on something cool and haven't made any other copies of whatever in a few weeks. yeah, that's when the system decides to blue-screen on you. i may be speaking from experience."

Uh, so any actual proof that it was the static that caused the problem? So many things can cause your PC to lock up like that, and I'm not so sure that frying a chip would then allow it to magically work for months after the fact. You "may" be speaking from experience, but then again, maybe not.]]>Jun 30th 2009 4:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 4:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Jun 30th 2009 3:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/microns-smaller-nand-chips-mean-more-faster-flash-memory-in-th/Posts that are already replies to other posts (like yours to mine) do not have a Reply button, so forgive me for being limited by the website and not my own incompetence to press a Reply button.]]>Jun 30th 2009 4:50PM