<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[making the ring thicker doesn't make the lens bigger.  I suspect styling over substance here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bombastinator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 2:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[You suspect wrong - have you seen how the lens telescopes out ? When you design a lens, you have to put the mechanics somewhere...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc-O]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 5:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[seeing no pics of that anywhere.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bombastinator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 5:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/previews/olympusep1/page2.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/previews/olympusep1/page2.asp</a><br><br>Look on that page...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc-O]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 9:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why is the video set to private?! I want to seeeee!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BobSpaceTech]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 2:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Fixed! Video should be working now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 2:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is perrrrddddyyyyy!<br><br>I DEMAND AN ENGADGET RECESSION ANTIDOTE FOR THE E-P1!!!<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BobSpaceTech]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 2:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, I'd set my videos to private if the focusing was that noisy...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LondonConsultant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 6:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why not just focus manually?  Does the audio pick up any noise then?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 4th 2009 12:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[No Pancake lens shots? :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony M.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[The shots I have seen from 17mm are very similar to the 25mm pancake - same CA in corners.<br><br>P.S. Here there are few shots with 17mm:<br><a href="http://fourthirds-user.com/2009/06/olympus_pen_ep1_sample_images_to_download.php" rel="nofollow">http://fourthirds-user.com/2009/06/olympus_pen_ep1_sample_images_to_download.php</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 7:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shoot in RAW (and chose the correct color profile or other tweaks) and/or adjust the white balance and you can probably make those color issues go away.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ajs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[i'd love to be blown away by the video recording too, but...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[all things considered]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 2:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[thanks for fixing that, josh. and while the video recording is no doubt impressive, i totally agree with your sentiments on the noise of the continuous focus; it gets so annoying after a while!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[all things considered]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not to mention the rolling-shutter distortion of the frame when the camera moves.  Not as bad as some, but still an issue.<br><br>The double-pumping on every focus attempt is not ideal, either.<br><br>The compression quality, however, looks impressive (not that the twice-compressed example on YouTube proves anything).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Information Central]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 6:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope the loading time is better than what I have on the FE-230 I have. It looks like it's a pretty sexy camera though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Bertolino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does it come up as a worthy competitor to the DSLRs of these days?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 2:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Depends on what's important to you. No dSLR comes close in terms of size so if that's a priority it really has no competition.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 7:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really wish this had a coupled rangefinder, I'd be all over it. <br><br>:(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 2:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[> coupled rangefinder<br><br>17mm lens has rangefinder add-on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 7:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dummy00001 , actually, that accessory for the 17mm is just a viewfinder. a coupled rangefinder is something *completely* different.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jangie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 10:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd be more inclined to take this camera a lot more seriously if its name didn't resemble the title for certain email spam I got all the time regarding "products" asking me if I wanted more inches.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Preston]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 2:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[those sounds are annoying. haven't heard any with my lumix fz3 so far, have to try it in a low noise environment next ^^<br>the still fotos of the ep1 do look nice!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blackster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Give me a viewfinder or give me death!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah they seem to have dropped it big time here. Like the look of the camera a lot but you need a proper viewfinder for it to be seriously considered as a proper camera these days.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 5:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2009/06/finding-the-view-and-zooming-it-too.html" rel="nofollow">http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2009/06/finding-the-view-and-zooming-it-too.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 7:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just add a light-shield to the back with a convex lens focusing on the LCD.  Instant EVF!<br><br>Of course, portability might suffer a bit, but then design it so it folds away like some opera glasses can.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CityZen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 2nd 2009 2:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dude it's 2009 we use lcd screens now. Viewfinders just don't cut it anymore.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2009 4:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[the video on that is fantastic, the noise of the lense seems a tragic oversight :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bk7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[The noise is jarring to say the least. That, plus the jerky focus, makes it look like some kind of special effect in a robo killer movie. Now if you want that in every video...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[unzarjones]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 5:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Focus manually, and the problem goes away.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Information Central]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 6:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[out with the olympus e-300 and in with the EP-1.  THIS is the camera I've been waiting for!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoyoma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[While your review mentions the availability of the external finder, it does not state that said finder is useless with the kit zoom -- it is a fixed finder with brightlines that match the field of view of the 17mm pancake. An important point, as it currently reads as if said finder would be a general accessory for the camera, rather than a specific accessory for the camera+17mm combo.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim F]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[> external finder ... 17mm pancake<br><br>Such viewfinders were always for prime lenses. E.g. Leica M8 rangefinder doesn't even have zoom lenses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 7:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dummy00001 - Actually, there are two zooms available for the Leica M system -- a 16/18/21 and a 28/35/50 -- not traditional zooms, but the same concept applied to the rangefinder.<br><br>Voigtlander makes a zoom external finder that covers 15-35mm, designed for use with the film & digital rangefinders -- it even has focal length conversion settings for the crop sensors found in the Epson RD-1 and Leica M8/M8.2.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim F]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 7:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[ugh. no manual controls on the camera ... only though menus?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[It has two control dials for manual exposure.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's the shutter release lag like? Is it fast like shooting a DSLR, or slow like shooting a compact?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[max.karpiak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you set the settings correctly on your P&S, it'll actually have less shutter lag than a dSLR because it doesn't have to move the mirror box out of the way.<br><br>If you leave AF on, this thing will be a lot slower than a dSLR because it doesn't have phase-detect autofocus.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 9:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[No viewfinder? You'd have to be somewhat serious about photography to spend that much on a camera, no way would I spend that much on a camera without a viewfinder. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Same for me. Luckily Olympus has already stated they are working on a version with more "pro features" such as an EVF. Their main target for this camera was people that are used to P&S cameras (none of which have VF's either. Sorry, plastic peep-holes like the Canon G10 don't count), but want SLR image quality without the bulk. I'd say they nailed that concept. Now I just want an E-P2 with EVF that looks like that fan mock-up thats been floating around the interwebs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I *really* wanted to love this thing. This dedicated Canon big-DSLR guy has been excited about the MFT concept since it's introduction. But the E-P1 just feels like it has too many compromises to be worth the investment in body and new glass. No viewfinder, crappy LCD, no flash (handy when you need it, and kind of expected in a small-format device), no usable video -- as much as there is to lust after, this first-generation unit would end up sitting on the shelf. I just hope the limitations of the E-P1 don't doom MFT altogether; I'd love to see what the 3rd-gen Pannie and Olympus MFT bodies can do.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Doesn't the $6,500 Canon EOS 1Ds Mk III have the same "crappy" 3" 230,000k LCD ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Perhaps, but it also has a TTL viewfinder!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[And it weighs 5lbs with a lens attached. Every system has its pros and cons. The trick is to pick out the one that best does what you need it to do. I to require a VF, but a great number of people couldn't care less. I always find it funny when I hand my DSLR to someone to use and they try and figure out how to compose a shot. Sadly, most people don't even think about putting their eye up to the camera these days.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA["Olympus does offer a $100 viewfinder attachment, though it's not going through the lens. It will help a bit in these situations, but doesn't really give you much wiggle room (or the accuracy you'd get with standard DSLR)."<br><br>The external viewfinder is only for use with the 17mm fixed focal length lens, not the 14-42mm zoom lens pictured here. The viewfinder is a passive optic and only provides framing assistance with the 17mm lens. It has nothing to do with focusing. The viewfinder is an item found on rangefinder cameras, and thus has little to do with the way an SLR (or a DSLR) functions. The viewfinder, along with manual settings, allows the photographer to operate the camera without the distractions of automation thereby shoot faster than those automatic function would allow. Some photographers would see this as a benefit or added flexibility in the design.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[so retro]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phiberoptik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA["just how compact the device feels in your hands and when compared with an average DSLR"<br><br>Stop comparing it to a DSLR! It is a Point 'n' Shoot with a bigger sensor, nothing more and nothing less. There is more on a DSLR than a big sensor. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Florian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Micro Four Thirds cameras are still very much DSLRs. There are no inherent compromises with the new format - Olympus opted not to have a viewfinder or base flash because they felt that if you needed them, you'd buy an attachment.<br><br>I'll agree that the lack of viewfinder might seem like a compelling argument not to call this a professional or semi-professional camera, but the fact is that viewfinders are just a common preference among photographers. Who's to say that in a year or two professional photographers won't want to see any effects or changes that they make in real time on their LCD screen rather than their archaic viewfinder?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[backslash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/olympus-e-p1-hands-on-test-shots-and-mini-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Exactly. It's not an SLR there is no mirror or pentaprism, thats partly how they are able to shrink the body size.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bdenglish]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 5:53PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
