<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Pentax K-7 review roundup</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Pentax K-7 review roundup</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[BFF]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DanielT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 1:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[I will stick with my Sony A-700.  <br><br>What does BFF have to do with this camera?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[prosportnutrition.net]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[What does your Sony have to do with  BFF?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LloydChiro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 8:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA["a solid alternative to Canon's 50D or Nikon's D300"<br><br>Thanks for getting the comparisons correct this time around Engadget :-)<br><br><br>c.f. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/19/pentax-k-7-hands-on-shots-leak-out/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/19/pentax-k-7-hands-on-shots-leak-out/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rawhead]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 1:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, I'd say it's more an alternative to the D90 than D300. It has some consumer oriented features like video and on-board HDR like the D90, but lacks some of the more professional features of the D300 such as 51-point autofocus.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon-E]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[51 point autofocus is a professional feature? autofocus is for noobs. real men do it manual.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[al]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 6:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[@al, especially when they are alone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LloydChiro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 8:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's too expensive to be a D90 competitor. Body only, the K-7 is $1,300 while a D90 is under 1k body only. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MONKEY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 9:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's its MSRP. It'll sell for significantly lower than that in a few months.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 9:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[From Photography Blog:<br>"Consequently it feels much more at home on the K-7 than the previous 18-55mm kit lens did on the K20D, although it remains a rather slow lens at both ends of the focal length (f3.5-5.6)."<br><br>Show me any other kit lens that is faster than 3.5-5.6. That's just kind of the de-facto standard...they should know...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan M]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 1:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Nikon 18-70 was 3.5-4.5 iirc...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bebop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 1:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oly E-3's kit is 12-60 (eq. 24-120) is 2.8-4.0.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 9:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[You mean a solid competitor to the D5000 and T1i right?<br><br>kidding]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kthung]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 2:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Almost bought a Pentax k2000 but Panasonic have to throw micro 4/3 at my face.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PhotoFre@k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 3:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pre-Ordered mine... and now hearing rumors of Samsung GX-30 (announcement 7.7.09). Decisions will be made next week on whether I keep the k7 or switch to the Sammy. I'd rather have the Pentax.<br><br>Either way, exciting times for the K-mount and the long line of lenses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ryeclifton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 9:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wouldn't count on those rumors if I were you. There's always going to be something newer and better eventually. There hasn't even been a real announcement for the GX30 while the K-7 has already begun shipping. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 9:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why don't camera companies get it? And reviewers, for that matter. Noise at increasing ISO levels is OK as long as there's a pretty UI? That's messed up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob S.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 10:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Vladislav, I think you are a better camera reviewer than the previous one. Thanks for posting a well informed infos.<br>This Pentax K-7 is surely a nice camera. I've checked everywhere and there is NO OTHER BRAND that can be totally WEATHER SEALED at THIS PRICE. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Herman S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2009 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pentax K-7 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/pentax-k-7-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Forgot one detailed review of the K-7: <a href="http://www.neocamera.com/review_pentax_k7_more.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.neocamera.com/review_pentax_k7_more.html</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Itai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 2:20PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
