<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't care. Want solid state.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie M]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 8:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[FTA "...improve the density of magnetic data storage, by around a thousand times. The data will also last much longer than is possible today."<br><br>In other words ~2 petabytes of highly reliable data in a 3.5" case.  This has a lot to offer over SSDs for many applications.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kylehase]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 8:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[SSD's are still going to be more expensive and less cost effective than what these drives could possibly introduce. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htowngator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 9:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm more concerned with read/write speeds; hard-drives are cheap enough and large enough for me as they stand (although nothing wrong with more pr0n space, right?).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samboini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not as if this technology will be out commercially anytime soon. SSDs are just getting started, and there are about a dozen next-generation potential replacements to NAND Flash in the laboratory that are far faster, far denser, etc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 8th 2009 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[The future looks amazing. Now we just need to put all this future tech together and make something really amazing. I'd like to pair this up with a nice quantum CPU.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Templarian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 8:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[What exactly are you going to do with that quantum CPU?  Do you even know what one does with a quantum computer?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[snakegriffin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 8:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[@snakegriffin, faster servers for everything?<br><br>(or that project to find the perfect pie... mmm pie)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Templarian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 8:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Download porn??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andyupchurch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 8:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Quantum tech isn't something that's going to be used for everyday computing... it's to be used for very specific tasks.  In other words, mainly in a coprocessor capability.  The algorithms for quantum computation are quite different than the ones used for classical computing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[snakegriffin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 8:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm... I wanted to post something like: Comment about Pron in 3...2...1...<br>I guess I was a bit late for that, after andyupchurch already mentioned it.. It's kinda sad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 9:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[@snakegriffin<br><br>That's probably what they said about GPUs]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KarlW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 11:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Karl W<br><br>No, that's no how it works. Quantum computers offer no advantages for traditional data processing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 8th 2009 2:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[And now I remember why I hated chemistry and PHYS 241.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dayne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because you hate the idea of a petabyte hard disk?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KarlW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because I hated molecular geometry, current flow diagrams, ionization energy and electron affinity of particles.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dayne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 1:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Carbon rings, of course. You can achieve anything if it has carbon, ring, nano, or tube in the name.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TimmyRaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 8:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[what about onion rings?<br><br>i love onion rings...<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mocax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 8:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Burgers and hot dogs, that's what you can do with onion rings.<br><br>Damn I'm hungry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TimmyRaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 9:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[and all of them are carcinogens!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wako]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 10:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just fixed the Engadget comment system using onion tubes.<br><br>Nobel prize, here I come!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KarlW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA["grizzly details"?  there are bears involved?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chris2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 9:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[I see what you did there.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htowngator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 9:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do you really see it? Here's what the oxford dictionary says on the subject:<br><br>Grisly and grizzly are often confused. Grisly means 'causing horror or revulsion', as in grisly crimes, whereas grizzly is chiefly used with reference to a kind of large American bear, and can also mean 'grey or grey-haired'.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cool I can use this with the promised batteries that last 1000 times longer and have 10000 times the capacity.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 9:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[...to play DNF.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ED]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 6:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[But if you use Carbon, won't the elitist hippies get pissed and charge you for Carbon credits?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ROBERTO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ill say. Carbon, Ahhh global warming... stupid hippies!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scuba Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 4:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Benzene? Does this mean that computers will smell from now on?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bartoron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 9:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wwhat, thank you for that accurate bit of information.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladislav Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 9:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[how much and will it give me cancer?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 9:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Only in the state of California.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dcnoren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Given the rapid rate of growth of OS and software bloat, this couldn't have happened soon enough.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[slyd3z]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 10:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Indeed, imagine how much more crapware we could be exposed to.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dayne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 10:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[hey c'mon, Vista wasn't so bloated.<br>:-P<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Magallanes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[I for one welcome our new carbon benzene ring nano-cobalt carcinogen based quivering purple tube overlords... and crapware isn't bloat. It's added undocumented features designed to drive you to switch to Linux.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zildorian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just when you thought the industry was finally going to ditch the hard drive. :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shezmu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 12:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gimme an Archos with one of these drives and the horsepower to be able to play anything from my MythVideo jukebox without modification.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hulse_kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2009 3:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carbon ring storage promises 1,000 times higher memory density]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/carbon-ring-storage-promises-1-000-times-higher-memory-density/</guid><description><![CDATA["Density" is a tricky word.  By shrinking the linear dimension of each "grain" by a factor of 10, the volumetric density improves by a factor of 1000.  However, with hard drives, it's the /surface/ density that's important, thus the capacity would only improve by a factor of 100.  Still a significant increase, but not as big.<br><br>Imagine a square platter that is 1 meter on each side.  If your "grains" are cubes with sides of 10 cm, then you can fit 100 grains on the platter.  If your grains are 1 cm, you can fit 10,000 on the platter.  The height (depth) of the grains doesn't matter, it's how many you can pack onto the surface.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 8th 2009 6:56PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
