<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[specs? maybe my mom can use it, since she is absolutely inept at PCs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GBeatzRecrds]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 4:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't wait to test it out. I wonder how it will be like. I hope there won't be an asshole judging it already when they haven't tried out yet.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Techie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 4:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[this would be great for my mom too. she just needs to browse the internet a little and to edit an office document here and there. and her PC has 256 MB RAM]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[G]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 4:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Im pretty sure its purely going to be for use on netbooks and devises where you just want to be able to boot it up quickly and take notes, check emails, surf the web, ect.  I think that this will help to define the line between netbooks and laptops and hopefully lower the cost of netbooks, if it takes off that is.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 4:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mom, Grandma... It could be the Wii of the personal computers: Maybe it won't hurt Micro$oft & Apple, but it can certainly go where they could't reach, like Xbox & PS3.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pasky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 8:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Only good for netbooks and old people.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoJew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 9:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Pasky, it would be awesome if I could install it on the PS3. Better than Ubuntu as far as usability on the PS3 goes in my opinion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[y3k.nik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 10:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks fake, since the Google colors don't start with yellow.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 10:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now seriously, couldn't Google come up with a name other than 'Chrome'. They named their web browser Chrome and now their OS. Even the logo is the same too.<br><br>What's up with that Google?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 10:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Gabe - good eye!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ash chapman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 10:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[In Soviet Russia, Chrome OS will use your m...<br>ah, nevermind.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Patriks7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wouldn't be that hard to beat Microsoft feature by feature, OSX on the other hand... <br><br>Microsoft's had 30 years and still no....<br><br>Native Spell Checker (ie, filling out a web form still sucks to this day), yes you can shell out another $400 bucks for Office but c'mon!<br><br>DVD Decoder Codec, still ain't native in Windows 7? Macs been doing it for years...<br><br>Backup, Optimization and Security that *should be native* but yet costs another $49 ala OneCare, and yet TimeMachine still works and looks and feels better...<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steveorevo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 8:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 4:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hopefully Google will not be releasing a late 2010 OS using something created in spring 2009.<br>It will already be old...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 11:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, looks full of features]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[barracuda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 11:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did I read ARM?<br><br>I know some people at Always Innovating that must be pretty excited to have this OS on the TouchBook.<br><br>Actually... I'm excited too, now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bokal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 4:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm... i think i might stick to ubuntu.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ratchetnclank]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 4:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is totally different than ubuntu though.  Its just running linux in the background while it runs programs and widgets in a web environment.  So it pretty much doing the same thing as palm is on the pre with webOS except its going to be put on netbooks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 5:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[@James<br><br>Or like Google is already doing with Android!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 8:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Matt<br><br>Android only uses a Java environment. WebOS uses all web languages (soon including Flash). So, they are quite different.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yevon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 9:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA["It was "amazingly fast" in its stripped-down beta form"<br><br>ORLY??<br>----------------------<br><br>PS. Google you stepping into the OS territory is a bad bad idea.... You didn't even wait to see how android is doing/will do. <br><br>Do what you are best at and refine it. That is the search engine and site ranking algorithms.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Twenty5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 4:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[So people should not diversify? I guess ive been getting bad investment advise all these years. How did you get to be so smart?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 6:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Android is only spreading in availability and appeal...it's doing well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lance]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 7:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Im not saying they shouldn't diversify their products. But it takes time to know if something is going to succeed. Android may have "strong sales", but shouldn't they refine and work on it a bit more before releasing a totally new platform?<br><br>Google seems like a control freak to me atm.<br><br>I have no idea why everybody loves Google with such a passion. It wont take too long for some to realize that Google is turning "evil".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Twenty5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 9:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't believe it. I'm expecting a different approach to an OS interface...Not something similar to Windows.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Premature ejaculation man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 4:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why?  Google have effectively been copying Microsoft's entire business strategy for years so it's no surprise that they'd copy their OS.  <br><br>Having said that I'd never use any OS with any links to Google.  Google have a bad habit of accumulating as much personal information as they can and I'd expect any OS they develop to take this as far as possible.  No company that colaborates with governments to the extent Google does should be allowed to hold onto anyones information.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jakem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 5:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm with you in that regard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Premature ejaculation man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 5:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[So please enlighten the world as to what you think would be a "better" interface...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andir3.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 6:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[=/<br>I didn't realise that in order to post my view, I had to come up with an alternative.On top of which, usually when one uses quotation marks, they actually quote what someone has written. <br><br>Of course I'm aware of Engadget's comment system, so I'm going to have to assume you were talking to someone else, since I never criticised or suggested that there was something better. I said I expected differently from them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Premature ejaculation man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 6:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow. if you guys think you can create a brand new looking interface for an OS why not try submitting your ideas than just sitting there getting fat and whining. i don't get it why people complain yet they don't do anything for it. you don't deserve the good things in life. nuff said.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brown Robott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 7:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark#Irony" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark#Irony</a><br><br>And since you did criticize them for making it "similar to Windows" (ooh, I used them to quote you that time instead of ironically!) I figured you could give us all insight as to what you think is a better interface for a web-centric operating system.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andir3.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 7:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA["To avoid the potential for confusion between ironic quotes and direct quotations, some style guides specify single quotation marks for this usage" - The wikipedia article ;D<br><br>"I never criticised or suggested that there was something better. I said I expected differently from them."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Premature ejaculation man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 7:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[You did criticize them... I can't believe I also have to point out the definition of criticism:<br>(n) criticism, unfavorable judgment (disapproval expressed by pointing out faults or shortcomings)<br><br>I point to your stated expectation of "different" without giving constructive criticism as to how they are to achieve this with a web interface.  (Oh no... I used double quotes again!)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andir3.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 7:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is the stupidest debate in the history of forever.  Just shut it up already.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chefgon_ign]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 7:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[omg Andir, stop being such a whiney dick]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorKaos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 7:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Andir<br><br>You'd be absolutely correct IF the OP's post had a negative connotation.  As I read it, it's fairly neutral.  "Different" doesn't mean he's passing unfavorable judgement; it just means he expects something else.  For a better understanding of "different" look at the tab placement for IE compared to Chrome.<br><br>My people are defensive of Google.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rells009]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 8:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jakem<br><br>"Having said that I'd never use any OS with any links to Google. Google have a bad habit of accumulating as much personal information as they can and I'd expect any OS they develop to take this as far as possible. No company that colaborates with governments to the extent Google does should be allowed to hold onto anyones information."<br><br>Big Brother is watching...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 8:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA["Google have effectively been copying Microsoft's entire business strategy for years so it's no surprise that they'd copy their OS." - jakem<br><br>I know, right?  I mean, Google is totally copying Microsoft Live Search.  Or wait, it's Bing now.  Whatever.<br><br>Anyway, Google is *totally* copying Microsoft.<br><br>*rolls eyes*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Quix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 9:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br><br>So from this thread, I learned how to quote someone properly and how I should use single quote and double quotes properly.<br><br><br>"Doh" -- Homer<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tinu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 11:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's obviously a fake (for me), I don't think Google is that stupid to put a huge "Google Chrome Private Developer Plus" using ugly fonts and classical colours. It just doesn't match with the whole design.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EdwinCky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 4:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[I noticed the font was not consistent with Google's logo, too. The "g" and "l" are both different. I also am surprised that the developer beta would be version 1.3.0. Wouldn't they use build numbers? Or 0.x versions? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Photoshop, 5 minutes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 5:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[I call fake.<br><br>1) Google never renders long strings such as "Google Chrome OS Private Developer Beta" in the google font and colours. That is restricted to the word "Google" only. You can easily make these highly unconvincing graphics at googlefontdotcom.<br><br>2) IT HAS THE WORDS "PRIVATE DEVELOPER BETA" IN MASSIVE LETTERS ON THE WALLPAPER<br><br>I've said enough.<br><br>Also, why is the start menu a few inches along the "chrome bar"? Seems a bit foolish to me.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 4:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[yea, and the colors on 'Google' dont even correspond to the real logo! fake without a doubt. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vistamaniac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 5:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[your right, google wouldnt continue the colored letters]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[glenskey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 5:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[there is also a strange smudge on the end of the chrome "e" you can see in this picture: <a href="http://chromeosleak.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/file0043.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://chromeosleak.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/file0043.jpg</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[glenskey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 6:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[I mean, it's not even the Google logo! Look at the colours!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Derry Quinn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 6:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes its very likely a fake.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 6:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not saying these shots are real for certain, but your argument is a moot point.  This wallpaper would have been designed by an engineer since it is obviously temporary, not something that's officially sanctioned by the logo/marketing department.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chefgon_ign]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 8:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/first-google-chrome-os-screenshots-leaked/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm sure it will be on the pirate bay soon :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sbrears]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 5:01AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
