http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/ Engadget Comments for F88 netbook stands out with HD playback, VIA Nano http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Jul 10th 2009 7:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Jul 10th 2009 9:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/]]>Jul 10th 2009 7:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Jul 10th 2009 8:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Jul 10th 2009 7:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/-Amazing battery

Pick one]]>Jul 10th 2009 10:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Jul 10th 2009 7:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Jul 10th 2009 7:30AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Jul 10th 2009 7:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Jul 10th 2009 8:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Jul 10th 2009 8:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Jul 12th 2009 1:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/
That kills it stone dead.]]>Jul 10th 2009 9:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Jul 10th 2009 9:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Interesting rig though.
I played with a Gateway with a 1.3ghz Nano in it, and it was pretty snappy, with 2gb of ram, and Vista. ]]>Jul 10th 2009 10:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Jul 10th 2009 11:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/
http://www.s3graphics.com/en/products/class1.aspx?seriesTypeId=1]]>Jul 11th 2009 12:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/
Intel's graphics are far from good, but they're great in comparison to Chrome 9, which has almost no gaming ability whatsoever and has lots of other compatibility issues. GMA950 can handle games a few years old, like Halo PC and what not, so if you really feel like playing a game on your netbook once in a while, you can. Chrome 9, on the other hand, can handle only 2D games and ancient 3D apps like the original Unreal Tournament (barely), and overall driver support is miserable (much worse than Intel).

Nano would be promising if paired with a decent chipset, like Nvidia Ion. But as it stands, if it's paired with Chrome 9, I'd take Atom + Intel chipset in a heartbeat.]]>Jul 10th 2009 11:34AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/If you follow the READ link, it pretty clear it maxes out at 1GB of RAM.
What gives? Don't you guys check your own links? ]]>Jul 10th 2009 12:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Jul 10th 2009 1:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/Jul 10th 2009 3:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/f88-netbook-stands-out-with-hd-playback-via-nano/There is conflicting information if you follow the link.
One part says 1GB another says 1-4GB.

That being said, if i could get the top spec'ed one at a fair price i would consider a net-book to.
]]>Jul 10th 2009 3:51PM