http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/ Engadget Comments for No surprise: Intel has known about Chrome OS, worked with Google on 'elements' of project http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 6:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/2. Mention something not in the article.
3. Be raving mad, but succinct.
4. Derail the topic.

Classic.]]>Jul 10th 2009 6:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
this is why we can't have nice things. enjoy your shade of gray tho :)]]>Jul 10th 2009 7:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 9:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
I do not know chaos motives to the post, but he actually (or accidentally) has a point.

When Wintel alliance between M$ and Intel was forged, M$ forced Intel to abandon completely desktop software development. Intel had very good software many might still recall from times of Windows 3.x. But then it was gone.

As Wintel alliance crumbled, M$ had lost its influence of past, I can be only happy about return of Intel to desktop software development.]]>Jul 11th 2009 9:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 11th 2009 4:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
FIRST!]]>Jul 12th 2009 4:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 6:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
but either way I still like both companies products

but if they ever attempt to take over the world we must rize]]>Jul 10th 2009 6:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 11th 2009 1:41AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/But with their support of Moblin it would be pretty weird to be one of the major backers of both Chrome and Moblin.]]>Jul 12th 2009 6:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 6:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
Reminds me of how I once asked someone about something that he had created and which tens of thousands of people admired, I asked about a clever detail and how he thought of it and he said "huh? No that was just coincidence", but for some reason I still don't believe that :) even though that's a bit like religion where people admire a random evolutionary thing and insist on there being a purpose like fools, but still when something is actually made by some guy at least you have a reason to assume it was done on purpose (unlike the case with their imaginary friend), especially if it must have taken time and effort of the guy.
Oops I'm rambling, excuse me.]]>Jul 11th 2009 6:54AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 11th 2009 5:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 6:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/The main problem/advantage of Linux is the interface. Currently Linux as far as specs n stuff goes runs great on netbooks, but the UI is a bit of a hodge podge. XP/7 ain't much better, but at least with linux you cna get someone like Google come across n refine a desktop OS to just netbooks.]]>Jul 10th 2009 7:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
No one is calling OS X just another BSD distro.]]>Jul 11th 2009 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
If only Google dropped their cash/engineering expertise to help with Moblin instead of forking Chrome OS (not to be confused with the Chrome Webbrowser).]]>Jul 11th 2009 1:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 6:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 7:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 7:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
Anyway, you're a systems engineer, leave the design to the people with talent. They know what they're doing mostly]]>Jul 10th 2009 7:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
sir, i applaud your comment.....

just how i dont tell my mechanic how to fix my car
a SystemS Engineer can't tell a designer how to do its job ....]]>Jul 10th 2009 7:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
or

Do something REALLY useful...


No doubt about it, ENGINEERS RULE!]]>Jul 11th 2009 6:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
http://www.ff2d.com/wp-content/gallery/onecomics/Google-Sfida-Microsoft-con-Chrome.jpg

]]>Jul 12th 2009 4:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 7:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 11:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 11th 2009 1:44AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
If Google can join up with ARM and create an ultra cheap small netbook and brand it something like "Google Internet Minicomputer" and then sell it for 100 dollars it would give people cheap as peanuts fast internet access so they can send their emails and check their facebook statuses which is all the majority of people do on their computers.

100 dollar netbook that boots up in 5 to 10 seconds and lets you get access to your facebook and twitter at every Walmart is the key.

After all if most people can check their emails and facebook status for 100 dollars its going to be hard convincing them to splurge for a more expensive set up or trying to explain to them the advantages Windows 7 has when none of those are relevant to your average user.]]>Jul 10th 2009 7:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
Why do you think Intel is all over it? ;)]]>Jul 10th 2009 9:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 7:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 7:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 8:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
This announcement is... confusing.]]>Jul 10th 2009 8:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 11th 2009 2:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 8:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Chrome OS will run on intel chips just like every other OS (All Linux flavours, Windows, Mac OS, BeOS, OS2 etc)

If Moblin isn't worried about Windows or Mac OS why should it be worried about Chrome OS or me talking about it like it's a person ?]]>Jul 10th 2009 8:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 8:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
Just my 2 cents.]]>Jul 10th 2009 9:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 8:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 10:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 11th 2009 12:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 10th 2009 11:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
How did that work exactly?

Google: "Will you guys supply us chips for our new linux distro"?

Intel: "Um, sure"

]]>Jul 11th 2009 1:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://software.intel.com/en-us/

]]>Jul 11th 2009 1:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
Intel will play this one close to the vest. I'm sure they are playing down their involvement with GOOGLE, just the way they did when IBM was their big OS2 partner and Microsoft was the small O/S company.

Regardless, we're winners in the end.]]>Jul 11th 2009 1:47AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Maybe Google should truly trim ChromeOS down, and design it to be an instant-on OS. How's that for an idea. The OS will get more exposure as users will be more than likely to use it first than waiting for Windows to boot.]]>Jul 11th 2009 2:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
"On and surfing the net in seconds"]]>Jul 11th 2009 4:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/
Apple uses also have a hard time wrapping their head around large corp entities. The simple fact is that Intel has teams working with Dell, Apple, Toshiba, Gateways to optimize drivers. There is no reason to think that Intel doesn't have a small team helping Google on COS while the work on their own implementation for Linux. ]]>Jul 11th 2009 2:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/no-surprise-intel-has-known-about-chrome-os-worked-with-google/Jul 11th 2009 4:37AM