http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/ Engadget Comments for Invisible flash produces photos without glares http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 6:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/
That's a bonus, not a problem]]>Jul 17th 2009 2:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 3:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 11:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 11:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 18th 2009 1:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/
... in other words CANCER

I assume it's a small dose, though...]]>Jul 18th 2009 11:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 6:54AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/
This tech would be useful if the ir filter can be switched on and off though. Taking the IR filter off would also increase sensitivity by about a stop.]]>Jul 17th 2009 7:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 8:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 9:22AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 4:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/And the intelligence agencies already have IR nightvision stuff obviously.]]>Jul 18th 2009 11:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 6:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 6:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 10:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 7:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 7:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 10:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 9:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 7:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 7:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 7:30AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 7:31AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 7:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 7:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/
*rim shot*]]>Jul 17th 2009 8:13AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/
Good luck folks....too bad that won't be able to see a damn thing in a few years. ]]>Jul 17th 2009 8:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 8:31AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 9:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/
If only the radiation would have taken out the jewels BEFORE they could reproduce.


Also, UV light is emitted by almost all light sources.]]>Jul 17th 2009 11:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/
Completely different comparing non-ionizing EM radiation from a Wifi router. vs. a high intensity UV flash directed right at your eyes. UV light bulbs/LEDs will cook your eyes in a very short amount of time. Don't believe me?

Well you could A) do some research or even better B) go buy some UV lights for your house and stare at them everyday and see how your vision is in a year.]]>Jul 17th 2009 12:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/
I'll go ahead and venture a guess that since these people are developing a tech for picture taking, and that the example is a portrait (face towards camera), that they just MIGHT have thought of the whole UV light being bad for you (which is a generalization, not all EM radiation at that end of the spectrum will blind you).

Also, you missed the point, I was not comparing routers to uv, I was highlighting the ridiculous armageddon type response. (ITS GONNA KILL US) from htr-labs

duh.]]>Jul 17th 2009 4:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/
see comment by bigcow05 above]]>Jul 17th 2009 4:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/I'm sorry TangoEchoXray, people are fools, I think that point was made clear by both your example of foolishness and by people not getting it.
]]>Jul 18th 2009 11:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/
Pirate: "Kinda."]]>Jul 17th 2009 8:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/
BUT I CANT LOOK AWAY! AHHH

]]>Jul 17th 2009 10:41AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 9:31AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 10:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 9:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 9:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 10:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/
]]>Jul 17th 2009 10:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 10:34AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/
I have shot with IR sensitive film and the Fuji IS Pro.

Now that I think about it, I retract my first comment. Above still stands.]]>Jul 17th 2009 10:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 10:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 10:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 10:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 10:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/17/invisible-flash-produces-photos-without-glares/Jul 17th 2009 11:30AM