<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[so how does it go online to donwload the new web browser?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can we make them relent and change their upgrade policy? <br><br>I don't want to install vista, then windows 7, every-time. :( ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[Presumably they'll present several options and once you select one, Windows will download the file directly. A browser isn't necessarily required to just connect to a server and download a file.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[o29]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah I was just about to say how is the average dumbass user going to surf the web initially to download a new web browser?<br>and how the hell can you have a monopoly over web browsers? Almost all of them are free!<br>  <br>I'm not to familiar with how MS was "forcing" users to use IE but it seems to me that having IE installed at first is a convenience.<br>If your to lazy to install a different browser that's your choice.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[@o29<br>The problem with that approach is if Mozilla (for example) changes the directory layout of their file server, it'll break the browser downloading feature, at least until the next update. Until that happens, clueless users will complain that "Microsoft's browser downloading feature is broken" and, given how thick-headed the European Commission seems to be, this will probably land MS in a lot of hot water, despite the fact that they are not at fault.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Khav]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope Firefox will be an option.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good Question.<br><br>I got one How does one download said browser if they are getting a new computer and are setting up a new internet connection; to get online they need to setup the router and most likely will need a browser but if one its not installed how do you do that without an internet connection<br><br>(assuming that some providors don't install one at all, or they buy a new computer and then an upgrade or retail version of Windows)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xoyuji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ khav<br><br>You are absolutely right my friend. If your gonna twist Microsoft's nipples about this brower stuff there is no way you're going to get them to host other companies browsers on their servers]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would imagine oem's will include the install files with the crapware they already install, you pick from a list it installs, then asks you to install the latest version off the web.<br><br><br>The real question is, how long before opera whines because IE is at the top of the list and they're not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[How hard would it be for MS to request a static address from Opera, Mozilla, etc from which the latest version can be downloaded?  I'm sure these companies would LOVE to have Windows automatically download their software in this way.  They can change the folder structure of their fileservers every day if they want as long as they update the link (doesn't have to be a hard link, just an alias of some sort.)  This would also be great for everyone else who downloads the browsers manually.  Imagine just typing in <a href="http://www.opera.com/downloadlatest" rel="nofollow">http://www.opera.com/downloadlatest</a> or <a href="http://easy.mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">http://easy.mozilla.org</a> and immediately downloading the latest version.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 3:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[So what happens if Microsoft puts "recommended" next to Internet Explorer? does that mean we will be having more bitching from the incompetent browser community like opera... firefox seems to be doing quite good without this idiocy option!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[I read someplace that the manufacturer may "customize" the computer and provide a choice of browsers (almost to the extent of a windows flavor). <br><br>Whatever happens, it's a dumb ruling. Those who know about and want another browser will go ahead and get it. Those who don't will stick to whatever you give them. Might as well pack in FF and have EU destroy Mozilla. Or better still get those whiners Opera in there.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DirtyVegas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 4:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[@K:<br><br>That's kind of what I was thinking. Or even if the other browser companies don't want to do this themselves, Microsoft could do it. Say the user chooses Opera, and Windows connects to something like www.microsoft.com/operalatest that in turn redirects the user to the latest file. This way, Microsoft can oversee that these links are always working and accurate, and when there is an update or change in their directories, Microsoft can change where the user is redirected accordingly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[o29]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 5:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[The European Union sometimes makes the dumbest decisions in these "anti-competition" trials they have with different sorts of companies.<br><br>Internet Explorer gives the average user a fully-featured internet browser. Microsoft allows the user to use that browser to download a new browser if they wish, and make that the default browser. In no way does Internet Explorer try to uninstall the new browser. Providing an operating system without a pre-installed browser will severely hurt the average consumer in Europe who could decide to return their new Windows PC because "it doesn't have internet" and get a Mac instead.<br><br>Also, Microsoft also pre-installs Windows Media Player onto Windows, why don't they stir something up with that? Stupidity at its finest. If a commission wants to investigate a certain case, the investigators/lawmakers in charge of investigating better know what the fuck they're talking about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ALBGunner04]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 5:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[The European Commission is worse than the FCC it seems when it comes to this.  I wonder how apple gets around this, not only do they bundle safari with osx but you can only get osx on apple hardware.  Not saying there is anything wrong with what apple is doing but just wondering why the European Commission is forcing MS to do this and not apple (personally i think once you buy a copy of OSX you should be able to install it on whatever hardware you want to even if apple doesnt support it).<br><br>And is making someone use IE8 for the whole 30 seconds it takes to type firefox.com (or whatever browser they want) and click download really that bad?  They arent forcing it on anybody anymore than having it come with minesweeper and saying that it gives it a monopoly over other games.<br><br>What next say that it cant come with wallpapers pre installed because its taking away from other photographers who may be able to have their pictures as my background?  Or it cant come with paint because adobe photoshop can do everything paint can do?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 11:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Daniel<br><br>What makes you think that a web browser is required to download data?  There are various data transfer protocols available so all Microsoft needs to do is point to download locations for the various alternative browsers and the other manufacturers simply need to provide Microsoft with the necessary information.<br><br>I don't think this is really going to work out but the sooner IE goes away the better everything will be.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelmon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2009 6:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[i am an opera user and i am against this ruling,<br>i was agaisnt the inital bitching from everyone<br>hell if microsoft is making an operation system,<br>they should even be allowed to disallow all browser downloads,<br>let alone have an inital IE. but obviously microsoft wont do that.<br>but the browser's still great, and i wont mind going to opera.com using ie for 10 seconds.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mynk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2009 2:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[The E.U. doesn't fully understand the situation... they just look for possible ways to milk other countries to make themselves stronger.<br><br>As far as I'm concerned, the E.U. can eat s**t.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[E71]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2009 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[How did we get Adobe Flash for years and years... OEMs managed to ship that one ready to go just fine. Some of you don't remember the late 90's early 00's when every time you started IE or WMP it would overwrite your preferred choice of browser or media player... For a few years if you had quicktime as your default choice and played any Windows Media you would have to re-install Quicktime (or realplayer etc) in order to get your functionality back. The same with browsers. <br><br>Also, while OEMS are free to ship nag-ware garbage with their machines they were banned contractually from tampering with Microsoft's default settings for most of XP's lifespan. That meant OEMS could not install Firefox without adding it as some extra paid service like they did for media players.  <br><br>I agree the EU misses the boat in these cases, but it's hard to identify "wrong" in software sales like it is in real space. There's lots of extra layers of license and marketing contracts that allow companies like Microsoft and Intel to keep moving the illegal demands between departments for years before the authorities can even collect proper complaints. The proper solution would be to treat Microsoft as a "utility". They should be disallowed from paying advertising "kickbacks" and disallowed from private OEM contracts. All OEMs should pay a published price per volume, right on the Microsoft Website for everybody to see. An OEM copy from places like Newegg is $99-$169 so EVERYBODY (Asus eee, Dell, HP,etc) should pay that amount with out any kind of contract allowed. The side effect would also be to limit Microsoft's ability to suddenly drop the prices for one customer attempting to try something new. <br><br>In other punishments I think Microsoft should be required to "cash out" 150% of it's liquid assets to stockholders...That would fix Microsoft's ability to "give away" things to hurt competition and force them to stick to markets they profit from and stop squashing profitable companies just so "the other guy" can' t make a profit because they might compete with Microsoft at some point in the future.  it's really "stockholder" money and Microsoft is misusing it repeatedly...Look how often they're in courts for monopoly or unfair trade practice. Tell the stockholders to put the money in some other company and fix the REAL problem of monopoly capitalism, and create some new competition. <br><br>Realize too, that Microsoft's headquarters situated in Ireland really don't do the EU much good as it's a tax and legal haven but enjoys full run of the EU to gather it's bags of money. Companies like Mandriva or Opera (Suse used to be) are founded and headquartered in Europe, so it's in the EU's interest to promote it's own software industry (and jobs) so they don't have to worry about American government interests in their software. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mabhatter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 26th 2009 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[@E71 "The E.U. doesn't fully understand the situation... they just look for possible ways to milk other countries to make themselves stronger."<br><br>I'm sure someone who doesn't realise that the EU isn't a country has a full understanding of the situation.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thebomberman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 27th 2009 5:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA["and computer-makers will also be able to pre-load any browser they see fit for their systems"  So if, say, HP decides not to put any other browser on their systems and leave IE alone then MS is in the clear.  Interesting.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kdkoch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not that interesting.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoJew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[Indeed.  And on the flip side, OEMs can offer a choice.<br><br>Gateway offered this "ballot style" choice to their customers with the Gateway.net service back in the late 90s.  It presented IE, and Netscape Navigator as equal choices.  This pissed Microsoft off to the point where they jacked up the Windows and Office license costs Gateway was paying to crazy high levels.<br><br>Equal choice, and MS threw a fit, one that helped add to the problems Gateway began having in the late 90s.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 4:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm.  This could get MS into some trouble if people start getting viruses through Firefox or Chrome, since MS won't be supporting/updating those browsers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, but Mozilla and Opera WILL update their security features, like always. M$ is not responsible for 3rd party browser security.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vicada]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[...and Google, and Apple, and everyone else.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vicada]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes I understand that.  But the fact that they're including them with their operating system... I dunno, it could get sticky.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[They aren't technically "including them", they are being shown an option to willing download 3rd party products.  Also I think you are more referring to browser exploits than viruses.  If you download an infected .exe for example, your anti-virus software will likely not notice until the download is complete (no matter the browser).  Also I sure there will be a doosy of an EULA to "read" before you make any choice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Rayo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MAtt @ Khav<br><br>Why would Mozilla change the download path, thus losing on of 300 million potential downloads? Use your brain.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[redcard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 4:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[and beside all the rest of the points made, whos to say that IE won't just pop open with a Mozilla,Opera,Chrome window and let you download it from there. my guess is tyhat someone unfamiliar with the non-IE options won't be downloading those browsers anyway, and anyone that does, is aware of the implications-updating, add-ons, skins, ......<br><br>The best thing to come of this is that it will allow MS to track how many non-IE browsers are requested for use on their OS, allowing them to guage whether or not they need to up marketing for IE.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[3Djesus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2009 2:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is news? I thought Windows 7 E edition was going to be shipped without a browser right from the get-go? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[So the consumer would bring their brand new computer home, plug it in and turn it on, and they want to use the internet. No browser? That's ok, they'll just dow-- oh.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Khav]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA["The last we'd heard on this story, the company was considering shipping the new operating system without a browser altogether, but it looks like those plans have changed."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[curtisrutland]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well if they are bringing it from the store I'm gonna guess its a brand PC. You know the ones that already have bloatware installed. I'm sure adding IE, Firefox or Chorme n Google Desktop to the mix won't be too hard for them.<br>As for folks who build their own and will be using OEM copies then I would guess they are tech savvy enough to have a copy of essential programs on a flash drive, or maybe PortableApps?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[deanb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 4:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[The first two sentences are a bit misleading, but there's now more to the story.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamasama]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 6:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA["At the end of the day, we're personally just happy to not be using IE" Why? IE 8 is very solid browser. I am a web developer and IE6 and 7 to some extent are a constant pain in my side (and schedule) but IE8 has all the features of a modern browser, great standards support and actually loads pages faster than Firefox especially with the usual plugins. They also included compatibility mode for all the sites that were built with IE6 in mind so all the corporate users with their hacked together intranets can finally upgrade to a modern browser. So lets give credit where credit is due.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree... but everytime I post a comment like this I get called a troll. Let the name calling ensue in 3... 2... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric D.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[I switched to Opera years back because it was the fastest at the time, by quite a noticable margin, and I've just become used to it.  I have to resort to IE8 for some sites, and I agree 100%, it's a very competent browser.  If Opera fell off the face of the planet, I would probably switch to IE8 full time, although I might give Chrome some consideration due to it's alleged javascript performance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamokazi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[How the hell are you a wed developer. I am also a web developer and we have to double our code for IE 6/7/8. We get the same stupid errors on IE 7 and 8 but everything is good on Safari and Firefox.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cris T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[then you are obivously not a real web developer.  Real developers know how to deal with those thigs....successfully.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[inteller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Cris<br><br>Well what he says makes sense to me. Our ASP.NET developer for our intranet primaily uses FireFox for himself, but he would always have me check it in Opera since he knew it was fully standards complaint and occacionally have to find workarounds due to some non-standard stuff in FF (rare, but it happened), and then he would make exceptions for IE6/7 as always.  (The only part that was actually necessary was IE7/6 compliance since that is what all our users use, and I am the ONLY Opera user...he is just a perfectionist :-)<br><br>When IE8 rolled out, we had 1 minor javascript issue.  Everything else was fine.  We just converted our logistics subsystem from our older ASP format to .NET and he never had to worry about IE8.<br><br>Now obviously this is limited to ASP which is Microsoft-friendly, but there is a lot of standard HTML and CSS involved that could go wrong.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamokazi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree.  I have actually switched back to IE because I'm tired of waiting for FF to load.  It's a fairly minor annoyance, but an annoyance nonetheless.<br><br>I have IE8, FF3.5 and Chrome installed and available in my start menu.  Chrome has some nice features, like the browser resource profiler that show how much more efficient Chrome and IE8 are than FF3.5.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FitFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 3:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[IE8 is a damn good browser, I would use it as my main browser if there was an adblock and no-script addon like I use in FF.  IE8 > FF because they ship a 64bit version, Mozilla refuses to write a 64-bit browser.  Come on people, this is 2009, all new PCs should come as 64-bit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mayur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you hadn't posted this DT, I certainly would have.  IE 8 is a fantastic browser for modern times.  I wouldn't say that it is far better than the competition, though, because I don't think you can actually say that one is better than another today.  All major browsers out today are good in their own right, and very comparable.  This IE hate stems from opinions on older versions of IE, when Firefox and Opera actually were much better.  People who aren't fans of Microsoft and its products always make it seem like it is much worse than it really is.  This is the exact same situation that Apple supporters are using in regards to Vista.  After the first Service Pack, most of the initial problems with Vista were resolved, and it was a great OS.  But, Apple capitalized on the initial problems to make Vista seem like a horrible OS.  The people that say that Vista sucks, and therefore still use XP, are the people that haven't ever used it.  (And bought into the negative hype created by Apple.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Esteban]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 4:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Cris T:<br><br>How are you a web developer and don't know that FF STILL doesn't fully support the HTML4 standard.  Tags that IE has supported for years, Tags that have been on BugZilla for years.<br><br>The FF team only markets "standards compliance" they don't seem to actually care.<br><br>And most people are unlearned about these things, so when a standard breaks in FF they still blame IE for some reason.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ordeith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 5:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[It will be interesting to see how this is implemented....seeing as how there are sooooooooo many browsers to choose from, all either based on IE or Mozilla, or the others like Chrome and Opera. I bet they'll have to release definitions through Windows Update to keep up on them.<br><br>Not a bad deal, albeit more work for MS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Neoprimal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[Someone did a terrible job photoshoping that flag.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MegaBite]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[*W7 MSPAINT]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter F]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 2:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Peter F<br><br>Have you ever used Windows 7 Paint?  It is actually a damn good image editor now.  Not good enough to make a legitimate Photoshop-quality image, but still very sophisticated.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Esteban]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2009 4:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-relents-to-european-commission-will-give-users-browse/</guid><description><![CDATA[HOLY CRAP! I've been using Windows 7 for months now and had no idea that there was a new Paint! This is AWESOME! (Relatively speaking)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MarnBeast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 28th 2009 1:38AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
