<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for 802.11n finalization just a formality, interoperability to be preserved</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for 802.11n finalization just a formality, interoperability to be preserved</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n finalization just a formality, interoperability to be preserved]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, it's seriously been out that long already? What took them so long?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Schweppes7T4]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 27th 2009 4:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n finalization just a formality, interoperability to be preserved]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[Phew!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[desseptable]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 27th 2009 4:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n finalization just a formality, interoperability to be preserved]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[The router I purchased last June, or last week!!! Anyway, good thing!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 27th 2009 4:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n finalization just a formality, interoperability to be preserved]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed, I too just bought an N router earlier this month. Very glad to hear it will continue to work with newer hardware. :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ryaninc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 27th 2009 5:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n finalization just a formality, interoperability to be preserved]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[gonna skip this and get a draft .11ac next summer]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nintendo fanboy hater]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 27th 2009 4:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n finalization just a formality, interoperability to be preserved]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[Meh]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10minutehobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 27th 2009 6:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n finalization just a formality, interoperability to be preserved]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[glad i waited...  ::rolls eyes::]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TRAFFICBLOWS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 27th 2009 9:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n finalization just a formality, interoperability to be preserved]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oversimplified story, check out the real scoop here:<br><br><a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30880/100/" rel="nofollow">http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30880/100/</a><br><br>Basically, what this will do is let the manufacturers claim full 802.11n compatibility without any retesting.  The problem with this is that the final 802.11n certification test  contains tests for some optional features, such as the "three spatial stream" feature which allows 450 mbps throughput.  There will be no easy way for a consumer to tell the difference between hardware that has these optional features versus those that don't.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 27th 2009 9:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n finalization just a formality, interoperability to be preserved]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/802-11n-finalization-just-a-formality-interoperability-to-be-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[What took such an incredibly long and drawn out time of confusion? Ugh. Well, at least it's done so we can move on to bigger and better 802.11x drafts!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Valicore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 27th 2009 2:28PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
