<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Private bunker vacancy here!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Walrus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 3:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[I look forward to finding out how long the hacker has to physically steal my phone to "enable" this "vulnerability."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 3:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Michael <br><br>Maybe if you acutally read about the attack you would know the attacker doesn't have to.  Get a friggen clue n00b]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorKaos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 12:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Holy Sh*t, did i just up-rank PAC man?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phenoum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 31st 2009 2:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ProfessorKaos<br><br>I'm guessing Michael's smugness is due to the fact that he has SMS disabled, rendering this exploit ineffective on his iphone.<br><br>And yes you can disable SMS messages, you just need to call your provider and they can do that for you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joshadow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 31st 2009 2:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[wts faraday cage]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 3:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[A Faraday cage wont stop RF. Its good for protection from electrostatic charge and high voltages but radio will pass right through.<br><br>To stop RF it takes quite a bit of engineering. Rooms for RF testing that block out all external RF are quite a piece of work.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Macona]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 4:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[No an anechoic chamber used for testing RF does have a faraday cage to stop external RF.  Of course it does also have a load of absorping (spelling?) inside but faraday cages wired to ground is an easy way to reduce if not stop radio.  The radio waves induce a current in the metal will in turn creates an oposing electro-magnetic fireld which reduces the intensity of the radio transmission.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carpet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 4:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[6 inches of lead works pretty good too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 10:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[A Faraday cage does indeed block RF. Commercial RF-free rooms are hard to engineer only because of leakage points, such as the door, cable conduits and so forth. You don't even need solid metal, just a mesh finer than the smallest wavelength to block. Only evanescent waves that don't propagate will pass through the pores, and only a short distance before fading out exponentially.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 1:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm surprised Apple hasn't had it pulled yet like Boston MTA did with Defcon]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[A.C.E.R.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 3:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed. As much as I'm a fan of Defcon, there really isn't anything anyone can do about this now who is an end user. It seems more malicious than the spirit of the event and greyhattery in its glory to just shrug and release it.<br><br>I'm considering going without the phone tomorrow. If they release this with POC code and show it to everyone, they're just being dicks. Oh, and you too apple. Where's our friggin patch!?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nerdtalker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 3:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA["Oh, and you too apple. Where's our friggin patch!?"<br><br>They are too busy trying to fight the terrorists.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 9:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple can't be bothered with pressing security issues, not when they have to worry about keeping the Pre from syncing with iTunes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gad Get]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 3:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[+1 ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Absolute92]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 3:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Exactly.  Besides, no matter what they do it will still look like an iPhone so most users will still be happy.  :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mile]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 3:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think they're also declining decent apps whilst letting iFart2009 plus edition into the App store.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChazClout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 3:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[I might be taking my Iphone off the grid tomorrow when I'm at work. The only way that the Iphone will get patch is if Steve Jobs gets attack by the code.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darkinfero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 10:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think Apple is turning into an asshole. No patch for a major SMS hole, spewing out BS about how jailbreaking should not be allowed because it could be programmer to attack cell towers, being controlling and restrictive about the App Store, and failing to provide support to  some major problems with their Macbooks. Using Apple's logic about how a jailbroken iPhone/ipod touch can have their baseband programmed to attack cell towers, I think we should boycott all Macs because it's possible for them to be programmed to do malicous things. In getting a Pre once a GSM one comes out.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Le]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 4:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[In the interest of balance it needs to be said that the exact same exploit exisists for Android as well but that doesn't grab headlines does it?!?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 4:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[...turning into?...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sven vollstag]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 4:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[What do you mean turning into? They were always like this, it's just that everyone was too busy playing with their really clever fart apps to notice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ch3m1kal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 4:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA["Another pair of SMS bugs in the iPhone and Google's  ( GOOG -  news  -  people ) Android phones would purportedly allow a hacker to knock a phone off its wireless network for about 10 seconds with a series of text messages. The trick could be repeated again and again to keep the user offline, Miller says. Though Google has patched the Android flaw, this second iPhone bug also remains unpatched, he adds."-Forbes<br><br>Read the article completely before you make a comment.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shriah]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2009 4:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[@shriah<br>Yes the exploit was on Google's Android OS too and guess what? They patched (atleast) one of the bugs/exploits unlike Apple which has patched neither of them. Apple is too focused on fart apps and stopping the Palm Pre from syncing with iTunes to do anything.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Twig978]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 6:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Michael: were you born yesterday?  All of this stuff has been known for a long time now.  Apple is communist, they control everything and the users have no say.  I just find it funny that after Google Voice got pulled from the app store, everyone started saying they are switching to android and boycotting apple and what not, pfff all you guys are pathetic.<br><br>Fanboyism FTL!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mayur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 10:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[You think?  Wow.  So you are seeing the obvious only now? Apple has been an asshole for years now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Doe.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 7:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think this might push apple to release that 3.1 we are all looking foward to.  MAYBE this is the push apple needs to let us have our much needed MMS feature..  :: crosses fingers ::<br><br>As for me, im putting my sim card into my non iphone.  I don't want a hacker on my phone.  that is a no go...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Phelps]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 4:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[At most we would get a 3.0.x update.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Macona]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 4:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[MMS has been working without a problem since 3.0 was released, unless you're on AT&T, but there isn't much Apple can do about that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andune]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 5:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Paranoia ftw]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mechachu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 4:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[For having excuses that all center around security problems Apple isn't too interested in keeping things secure. <br><br>They could only do Web Apps because of "security reasons"<br>They were late with Copy and Paste because of "security reasons".<br>You can't JailBreak your iPhone because of "NATIONAL SECURITY" <br><br>What's their excuse for this being late? Because they certainly can't pull the "Security Reasons" card.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[insky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 4:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh yes they can. They are late because they don't want to release a fix that might introduce new security holes :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Strom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 5:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[They'll either find a dumb excuse or pull the no comment crap. The patch would be pretty easy to do in the month Charlie Miller gave them, no?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Twig978]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA["Fix this hack?  Heck no!  Then they'd just find another that we DON'T know about yet!  Better to leave things as they are."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DeoWulf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 9:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's to stop Apple from telling AT&T, "hey, block all text messages containing this specific code?"  Charlie Miller gave them a month's advance warning, just because Apple didn't reply doesn't mean they're not working on the problem...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The WC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 5:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>.. AT&T saying "No, fix the problem you dicks" ?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FuzzyCat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 7:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Right, so you think AT&T is going to intercept every single text message on its network, monitor each sequence of 512 and block those which lead into this exploit? <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MattWPBS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 8:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MattWPBS<br><br>It's just a new line to the long list of things they already check.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryback]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 8:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Colour me embarrassed, honestly didn't know carriers screened for certain text message patterns. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MattWPBS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 10:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's to stop AT&T from intercepting the SMS messages is this (Quoted from Mashable): <br><br>“We present techniques which allow a researcher to inject SMS messages into iPhone, AndroidAndroid, and Windows Mobile devices. This method does not use the carrier and so is free (and invisible to the carrier).“<br><br>Check the last sentence.<br><br><a href="http://mashable.com/2009/07/30/iphone-virus/" rel="nofollow">http://mashable.com/2009/07/30/iphone-virus/</a><br><a href="http://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-usa-09/bh-usa-09-speakers.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-usa-09/bh-usa-09-speakers.html</a><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 12:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Think different alright.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brown Robott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 5:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Crapple]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 8:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good thing that Apple products have such a good track record for being virus and hacker free, otherwise, with the mind-share that the iPhone has, this could really turn into a problem for them.  I trust that any unscrupulous individuals will abstain from exploiting this while Apple focuses on having jailbreaking your phone made illegal.<br><br>Dear Apple,<br><br>These are your ducks.  Please get them in a row.  Protect your customers, then worry about chasing the pennies you lose through non-appstore downloads.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[M67A2 Flame Tank]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 8:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple will keep chasing the pennies, they don't need to protect their customers.  Haven't you learned anything yet?  Apple has a VERY loyal following.  Apple can come out with a new product today called iCrap that smells, looks and feels like feces and it will sell.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[whayong]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 3:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Heh... do what I did, I killed my text plan, blocked all texts to the mobile number, and text using GV mobile on my iphone instead... <br><br>oh wait.. that's right, Apple killed the current software fix for this bug.... and you can't buy it anymore!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gerry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 8:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can get Sean Kovac's version of GoogleVoice free on Cydia<br><br>i have it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[logicbomb.de]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 11:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kill it! Kill ze iPhone!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 8:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[You have to reply to several SMS messages in sequence.<br><br>So if you receive an SMS that says <br><br>10001011001010101101010101101110010110101100000111010101110101010110 <br><br>PLEASE do not reply.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[exNewt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 8:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, if what you're saying isn't a complete fabrication, the text msg would look more like this:<br>&#8249;*&#213;nZ&#193;&#213;&#213;<br><br>But I think there's a word or octet missing from the end of that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xenoterranos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 10:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/sms-vulnerability-on-iphone-to-be-revealed-today-still-isnt-pa/</guid><description><![CDATA[But the Mac commercials all said that apple products don't have security vulnerabilities.  You mean they lie? oh my.. ooooo]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2009 10:24AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
