<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[So then, nothing new!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddy Munn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 4:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[We really didn't need a review to tell us that the Sony W was crap, Sony didnt even try. <br><br>Seashell is one of the best netbooks around, with the its 10 hour battery. Another notable netbook is the TOSHIBA NB205 with 9 hour 6 cell.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 10:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's 4:05am; I can't go to sleep. And I have work at 8:30am where I will have plenty of time reading about the latest and ...ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[szfs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 5:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA["did you really expect the outfit's first "real netbook" to burn the house down?"<br><br>Not with its features...<br><br>Maybe with its battery... :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 5:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it just me, or is Sony pretty much the Apple of the PC world?  Even the "exploding" part they've got a certain link.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 5:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because all Apple products explode.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddy Munn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 7:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[If what you say is true they're going to be blowing my house down. Lucky I have home contents insurance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Haha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 8:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[glossy screen + lower than 6 cells battery = not 4 me<br>sony has done really good laptops, such as the TT, and I was awaiting something really different with these netbooks, but this is not what I wanted.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[raphael.cohen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 5:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA["Sony's going to have to do better than put a pretty face on a vanilla set of innards to get our next five Benjamins."<br><br>Engadget writers are big hyprocrits, they say this about this Sony but if it was Apple a computer like this, they would probably be saying it's a "solid" machine and worth the money.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Markos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 7:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it was an Apple computer it would be five benjamins to start off with. Times that by three, dawg.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Haha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 8:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[wouldn't]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Haha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 8:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[Meh...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GeekGirl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 8:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who Cares.....Stop Spamming!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GeekGirl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 8:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like the design of this netbook, except for the polka dot trackpad; that just looks stupid.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[i wonder what did you have to smoke to actually write that summary.<br><br>here are some quotes from actual article:<br><br>"At $499, the VAIO W might seem a little on the pricey side for a netbook. However, given its superb high-res screen, the premium is actually tiny"<br><br>"Whether the Sony VAIO W is a competitive entry in the netbook market depends on what you need from a netbook. Despite the pedestrian exterior, we like the stylish interior design, and the extra room afforded by the 1,366x768 display is a pleasure. We’re disappointed in the battery life, however. If the three-cell battery delivered closer to average performance—or if an affordable six-cell upgrade were available—we would highly recommend this netbook. But as is, we feel we have to hold back a bit.<br><br>That said, there's no going back from this screen resolution. If you've ever been frustrated with the scrolling issues on a 10-inch netbook LCD, you might just be willing to trade in battery life for the excellent display on the Sony VAIO W."<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 2:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[spw you said it resolution is everything with a netbook - that and the keyboard which Sony have no doubt done a great job on. Using a 1024 x 600 netbook is frustration itself. So many program pop up screens create problems to get to buttons at the bottom. Windows Mobile Device Center just one of these. Yes I would trade battery life for 1366 x 768 and shell out more for a bigger 6 cell battery. Nice to have the choice of bulk or power with 2 batteries albeit at a cost.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[grant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 3:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's VAIO W netbook reviewed: personable and pricey, and that's pretty much it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/sonys-vaio-w-netbook-reviewed-pretty-and-pricey-and-thats-pr/</guid><description><![CDATA[@grant<br>Of course Dell and HP already have the same 1366x768 options with the 6 cell battery - no need for compromise there. <br>This Sony netbook is nothing beyond average]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 3rd 2009 8:14PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
