<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[This app store thing is getting out of hand. It's a dictionary apple. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Palm Pre is also censored]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MONKEY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[paul. please. quit while you're ahead.<br><br>im tired of seeing the first page of comments full of your greyed out b.s replies and meaningless arguments.<br><br>thank you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skyblaze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[... yeah, but then he'd have to change his avatar.  Too much trouble.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Volite]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree.  Apple is getting a little too ridiculous.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bootleg Zani]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Paul A. Chapel <br><br>Seriously? Apple censors a dictionary and you are going to slam the Pre?(which is mentioned no where in the comments or the article). Pull your head out of Steve Jobs ass and actually contribute to the conversation moron. <br><br>There is no excuse for this, Apple doesn't need to protect anyone from the word 'shit'. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fuzzybunnyfeet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Damn skyblaze your right.  Look at Paul's comment history.  All it is Apple fanboy rants.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bootleg Zani]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was willing to give you some slack, Paul A. Chapel, but you seriously are a douche. I rarely read comments on Apple products and the stuff I saw you post on other topics was idiotic, yet not this obstinately delusional.<br><br>They censored a DICTIONARY and forced a 17+ rating upon it ... and you're defending it?!?<br><br>What kind of nimrod are you?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Colonel Kernel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[@quix<br><br>If we consider the app store a market in itself (with ~65,000 apps it makes sense), the act of Apple banning or modifying products created by independents IS censorship. Imagine if your cable provider began censoring HBO all of a sudden...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MONKEY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was willing to cut you some slack, Paul A. Chapel, but you seriously are a douche. I rarely read comments on Apple articles and the the few I saw of yours on other posts were idiotic, but not this obstinately delusional.<br><br>Apple censors a dictionary and forces a 17+ rating on it ... and you're defending it?!?<br><br>What kind of nimrod are you?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Colonel Kernel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[@skyblaze,<br><br>please....<br>no Paul no fun.<br><br>but,<br>no skyblaze and we still have the fun.<br>so u r insignificant.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thisisit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple is the new Nintendo with their Goody Two-Shoes standards. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hotrod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't even bother<br><br>That's not even the so-called "real" Paul Chapel.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[logicbomb.de]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Colonel Kernel<br>Paul is right. u can just buy the device of your choice then. And Pre is just an example.<br>So all I can say is his statement is valid though. It isn't like you are being forced to buy an iPhone though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ouch!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yep definitely not good stuff...<br><br>Apple needs to get a grip as this makes them look, well... stupid]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Baker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[To Quix<br><br>Have you ever read a dictionary? Please share with us why the government has to be involved before it can be considered censorship? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ivanh3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[@thisisit<br><br>jeeebus, why all the hate? :\]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skyblaze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Quix,<br><br><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/censorship" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/censorship</a><br><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/censor" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/censor</a><br><br>Where does it mention the government anywhere?  If your phone had a decent dictionary you would already know this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gipionocheiyort]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it doesn't fart is not allowed, simple!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JorgeA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Totally agree with the article.  Com'on Apple get your act together!!<br><br>I have the Dictionary App on my phone and there are many expletives that come up when you type them in]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[HOW IRONIC! The drones in this old TV spot are the apple fanboys, excusing the dear leaders EXTREME control and every bad move! That girl should have an Android logo on her shirt. Just sayin...<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYecfV3ubP8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYecfV3ubP8</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankenstein Black]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Quix<br><br>I'm a HUGE Apple fanboy, and even I think that your being a jackass. THEY REJECTED A STANDARD DICTIONARY<br><br>which part of that is ok? If your gonna suck off Steve at least do it well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[and you thought China was on the side of the planet. lol...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[egress63]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 2:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's funny is Engadget in a way censoring their post by only listing "ass" and none of the other words.  Censorship is everywhere and while I don't agree with it I find it funny that a site that obviously censors some words out of it's own post, posting in this case being the Engadget platform, mocking someone else for doing so on their platform.  <br><br>Ironic...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MarcC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 2:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[How can apple censor the word shit when they let so much of it into their app store??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 2:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[@skyblaze<br>*YAWN*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thisisit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 2:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MarcC<br><br>Josh was referring to the the fact that "ass" is a relatively tame word that also got censored. He wasn't implying that it was one of the big ones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CubeGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 2:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Engadget, I suggest a policy whereby when a certain percentage of a person's comments are "low ranked" within a given period of time, they perhaps should be prevented from posting any more comments for a month, as it's obvious they are adding nothing to the discussions at hand, and are infact being distruptive to them.<br><br>Perhaps in this way it would help prevent the trolls and fanbois...from whatever side of the fence they come.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Miker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 2:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[MONKEY, how is the Pre censored?<br><br>One of the emoticons is wtf<br><br>And if I mistook a Paul Chapel impersonator for the real thing, then my bad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Colonel Kernel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 2:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think it is absolutely hilarious that in a discussion about censorship in a dictionary, we have to turn to the dictionary to clarify the word censorship! Hahaha! I don't care whether we define the action as censhorship or not (I was going to call it flurfmoggin), I don't like the idea of what Apple is doing. <br><br>In the words of Bender from Futurama, Apple can "Bite my shiny metal... " ... Oh crap! I can't finish that sentence! I can't remember how to spell it and I can't find it in the dictionary!<br><br>We're doomed!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CgLearner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Everytime an App is rejected, a Chinese worker commits suicide.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mycroft]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 3:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[What would an Apple post be without an obstinate Quix coming to their rescue in an absurd fashion that only he (and perhaps Paul and Zak) can.<br><br>I'd really love to hear your counter-argument Quix, in light of the fact that other dictionaries on the iPhone offer access to these words, and that Apple's built-in dictionary for the Mac offers access to these words as well.<br><br>Duplicated functionality perhaps?<br>Well, we can toss that theory out the window considering that there are multiple dictionaries which exist for the platform already.<br><br>Draconian fascist policies on the other hand?<br>Just perhaps!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WindowsFTW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Marc<br><br>Apparently you cannot read, if you bothered to read the story you would have seen this paragraph<br><br>"We were rejected for objectionable content. They provided screenshots of the words 'shit' and 'fuck' showing up in our dictionary's search results. What's interesting is that we spent a good deal of time making it so that you must type vulgar words in their entirety, and only then will we show you suggestions in the search results. For instance, if you type 'fuc', you will not see 'fuck' as a suggestion. This is in contrast to all other dictionaries we're aware of on the App Store (including Dictionary.com's application), which will show you 'fuck' in the search results for 'fuc', 'motherfucker' for 'mother', etc."<br><br>Next time pick up a book instead of playing games and watching tv all day]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorKaos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 3:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MarcC<br><br>Apparently you cannot read, if you bothered to read the story you would have seen this paragraph<br><br>"We were rejected for objectionable content. They provided screenshots of the words 'shit' and 'fuck' showing up in our dictionary's search results. What's interesting is that we spent a good deal of time making it so that you must type vulgar words in their entirety, and only then will we show you suggestions in the search results. For instance, if you type 'fuc', you will not see 'fuck' as a suggestion. This is in contrast to all other dictionaries we're aware of on the App Store (including Dictionary.com's application), which will show you 'fuck' in the search results for 'fuc', 'motherfucker' for 'mother', etc."<br><br>Next time pick up a book instead of playing games and watching tv all day]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorKaos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 3:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Has anyone thought about " its their store... they do whatever they want????" if you don't like it then jailbreak....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[freakshowPR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[@freakshow PR<br>go tell that to the people who claim Windows shouldn't come preinstalled with Internet Explorer]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[its their store .. they can sell what they want .. you dont like it .. go buy a pre and install all 10 apps they sell <br><br>they dont sell porn at walmart because they dont want to ... apple doesnt want to sell some specific applications, that is their option and your option to buy apples product .. sell your iphone if your that pissed or shut up and deal with corporate policy.   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[----]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 3:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fuzzybunnyfeet<br><br>""Apple doesn't need to protect anyone from the word 'shit'. ""<br><br>they are not protecting you .. idiot .. they are choosing not to sell an application. if they are protecting anyone it would be themselves .  you all realize that it is THEIR CHOICE to sell what they want on THEIR store? right ?  doesnt sound like it!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[----]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does Apple also block Safari from accessing content where swearing occurs?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bjsguess]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 4:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[i don't agree with his position at all, but amid his nonsense Quix does kind of have a point:  historically, censorship typically does involve the state, church, or both in concert.  the roman "censor" (origin of the term) was a state officer.  whatever the dictionary says, you should look at a history book.  this is some kind of post-modern self-censorship, but no less deplorable for that.  apple is apparently afraid of being punished either by the newly aggressive FCC (which would certainly constitute censorship proper), or the marketplace (for example, a boycott by hypocritical, self-righteous parents who shouldn't be buying children cellphones in the first place).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 5:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOL @ crap in the appstore.<br><br>So I can buy an App that makes sounds like someone doing a shit, I can look up pictures of shit on Safari, I can watch people taking a shit probably even on YouTube, I can read articles with the word shit in them, but I can't have an App that tells me what the word shit actually means!!!!<br><br>I thought it was education that liberated people and gave them the power of discretion.<br><br>Apple is pulling a total FAIL with the AppStore.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cy Starkman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 10:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA["think different" to every normal human being. <br><br>Can you imagine if Microsoft banned rival browsers and media players from Windows due to 'duplicate functionality'.<br><br>Apple are quietly praying their market share remains tiny but noisy and profitable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod Rye]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 8th 2009 1:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can I speak for the millions of users who dont care about this censoring.?  The iphone is an excellent product, superior to other smartphones in SO many ways.  I know a lot of iphone users, and NO BODY CARES about this. Complaining for the sake of complaining, get over it.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dubs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2009 12:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Green Wall anyone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymonymous]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2009 1:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think this is a good idea, If true. There's to much foul words being spouted out by kids and adults nowadays.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adrian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2009 9:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Quix Too bad theyre censoring dictionaries, or you could look up the definition of censor, which just means to remove something you find objectionable. There is no requirement for it to be a government agency, so yes it is still censorship.<br><br>But you do succeed in making a point, only to fail to grasp the meaning. It is the free market. Which means we are free to discuss apple's stupid consumer relation decisions, and their growing control over their willing fanbase. And we have the right to chose to not want to purchase products that will mean future control over contant we want.<br><br>I just feel bad for all the unsuspecting iSlaves, who now may be realizing that their iSavior may be contrilling theri iContent, and unless they have a few hundred bucks to get a bb/pre/htc their iScrewed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Olsen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2009 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple is just operating consistently with their useage policy, so in a lawsuit no one can point to that app as a reason to justify their own use of toilet language.  I side with the fruit company on this one.  <br><br>Besides, if 10-year-olds want to read that kind of thing just for giggles, there is no shortage of blogsites full of it.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HaPPI]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2009 11:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Some people must have a lot of time on their hands to be spelling out curse words into their iphone dictionary.....what are you guys, 10 year olds?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[christinadingess]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 6th 2009 6:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great Job Apple!! It is their system and they should be concerned about what goes on it.  If you want a system with objectionable language and picture, develop it yourself. They have the write to make there product as wholesome as they want to.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cliff reynolds]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 7th 2009 12:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's new low: censoring a dictionary]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/apples-new-low-censoring-a-dictionary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Words fail me, and it's hard to find them in dictionaries too it seems, but I should check the levity, this is just disgusting and seriously sick.<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2009 1:08PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
