http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/07/agfaphoto-intros-beginner-friendly-optima-1-100-and-102-cameras/ Engadget Comments for AgfaPhoto intros beginner-friendly Optima 1, 100 and 102 cameras http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/07/agfaphoto-intros-beginner-friendly-optima-1-100-and-102-cameras/http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/07/agfaphoto-intros-beginner-friendly-optima-1-100-and-102-cameras/Aug 7th 2009 5:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/08/07/agfaphoto-intros-beginner-friendly-optima-1-100-and-102-cameras/http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/07/agfaphoto-intros-beginner-friendly-optima-1-100-and-102-cameras/Aug 7th 2009 6:50AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/08/07/agfaphoto-intros-beginner-friendly-optima-1-100-and-102-cameras/http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/07/agfaphoto-intros-beginner-friendly-optima-1-100-and-102-cameras/Most soporific "gadget" ever.
Oh, and 1080p is 2MP, but I suspect that the pics it takes look better scaled down to that res than using the full noise making capacity of the shitty 12MP sensor.

SameMcDull cheapo digicams should be 86'd from engadget, unless they do something new or interesting (adding a couple more MP, or pandering to a mainstream resolution does not fulfil either of these criteria, not even nearly) . Everyone knows what they do, why they exist and that there are new ones coming out all the time. They just don't care.
I mean, look at the excited discussions going on in this comment section. I'm only posting here because I am in a particularly bitter and twisted mood.]]>Aug 7th 2009 1:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/08/07/agfaphoto-intros-beginner-friendly-optima-1-100-and-102-cameras/http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/07/agfaphoto-intros-beginner-friendly-optima-1-100-and-102-cameras/
And Michael B, Leave the first posters alone. If you're lonely I'll give you a hug.]]>Aug 7th 2009 2:21PM