<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yay!!! This supposed to be on my next ZuneHD!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thisisit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 7:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[You're willing to pay $999999 for Zune HD?<br>$999999999999999999999999999999 can be cheapest among more expensive models, ya know?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shinigami]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 7:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA["...we should be seeing some MONSTER storage..."<br><br>Engadget, prepare for getting sued.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ahha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 7:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just like when they got "sued" by T-Mobile over the pink Engadget Mobile logo? :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOL, I remember when T-Mobile got pwned.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aguiluz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 7:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nicola]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 8:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[magenta, not pink]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[msalivar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 2:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ahha, that was funny but your avatar is in sync with Godwin's law, therefore you get low ranked.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neofolklore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 8:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[By the time products hit the market using these chips, I'll be about ready to purchase a 2nd gen SSD (1st gen are too expensive.)<br><br>Note to Engadget: Thanks for the MS Keyboard/ Mouse! Its been getting lots of use on my media center!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 7:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[First mention I've seen of someone actually winning a recession antidote...<br>I thought they just pretended to give stuff away.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony M.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 7:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[huh, how about that. maybe he's lying....just waiting till 500g is under $200 might be here a while]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 9:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[WOW! somebody actually won something!!?? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[make SSD affordable maybe? and where did the Nintendo story go? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WinXP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[I fail, for some reason firefox loaded a cached engadget page ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WinXP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 7:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[Packed full of delicious, delicious ECC to compensate for the massive number of errors these things will encounter on reads and writes. And to think that it will only get worse as they get smaller (and MLC stops working entirely.)<br><br>Also, engadget's comment system is broke as hell. It working is like rolling dice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[microlith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds like something the Zune HD and iPod Touch can take full advantage of for upcoming Christmas Season.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[terrence1019]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 7:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[damn 3bit good thing this is just storage and nothing else. would be confusing if everything was 3bit and not binary anymore.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheBuzzer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 7:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[3bit is still binary, you know...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loocas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[3 bits per cell. Not 3 states per bit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HyperHacker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 11:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[good news!<br><br>maybe I can get rid of my 500GB 7200.4 2.5in drives!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JayC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[you wanna pass that my way when you do?<br><br>7200rpm 500gb 2.5 inchers came out just 3 months after i got my 320gb - I was kinda pissed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just read the link, and it said 34-Nanometer or 34nm, its not 32nm Engadget.. Thought you read the announcement correctly?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[holy_moly112]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 8:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lol, seriously dude?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mehrad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 11:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[People everyone can't seem to grasp 34nm, subconsciously replacing it with 32nm.  I guess 32 is just so ingrained in our minds as binary based geeks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[msalivar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 2:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[According to this xbit article Sandisk and Toshiba already have 4 bit per celll (bpc) flash.<br><a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/memory/display/20090811113637_Intel_Micron_Develop_3_Bits_Per_Cell_NAND_Flash.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/memory/display/20090811113637_Intel_Micron_Develop_3_Bits_Per_Cell_NAND_Flash.html</a><br><br>It's just at a large size cell (43nm), so they should still be competitive]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sdsdv10]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 8:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess this will finally push prices into the 2.00$ per gigabyte. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prophet of the Light]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 8:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[you'll know when have a problem when a gigabyte of storage cost more than a gallon of gas]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[But didn't they invent something better than NAND already, 4 times..<br>How about putting that in cheap super small retail form? Why stick with NAND when we thought of better stuff?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 9:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pshaw, you guys are still using bits for storage?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MRLN, Fountain of Monumental and Beautiful and Otherwise Ineffable Wit and Wisdom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2009 10:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, Quantumphysics uses qubits. I don't know where he is right now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neofolklore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 8:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's...it's beautiful.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spectracide]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought this was microsoft's new retail store logo.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 12:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel and Micron announce smallest, cheapest NAND flash yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/intel-and-micron-announce-smallest-cheapest-nand-flash-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish someone would make a consumer-priced SLC SSD.  From what I read they are supposed to be >=10x the reliability and >=2x the speed of 2-bit MLC, and merely half the capacity.  So why are they 3-4x the price?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joquarky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 1:02PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
