<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too cool...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kingbirdfivezero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 2:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[nah... this doesn't even come close to the Fox show]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MJZimmer88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[...if it ever exists. My money is on never seeing this ever.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GRAMMAR POLICE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's available now with Wi-Fi, GPS, Bluetooth and dual battery chargers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hparks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 4:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Um, yeah, if you get rid of the screen, drives, etc., it takes less power than a netbook.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scarhawk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 13th 2009 3:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[With the screen (an 8.4" backlight TFT display) and a SSD it runs around 6.5W, which is still lower than most Intel Atom based netbooks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hparks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 13th 2009 11:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tegra will skin it alive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[broli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 2:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shame it's ARM however. Don't get me wrong with Android it probably kicks ass but some people want Windows because the familiarity with it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[richb93]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Chrome OS might change that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[broli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do brand names really physically attack other brand names ? Marketing sure is a dangerous sport.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major4Play]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 4:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[True because I don't want "netbook-level performance", I want to play HD movies, including full-screen youtube HD vids and 1080p HD vids so I hope next-gen Tegra will handle that and much more.<br>Intel? The calculator maker? Yah, it makes nice CPUs which fail to calculate why people want moving pictures, not only numbers and web pages.<br><br>Did I mention netbooks fail to play flash-based videos if you have several internet pages with flash opened? Acer Aspire One certainly does - plays 3fps till I close other pages with flash ADs (can't turn off those pesky ADs otherwise).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shinigami]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 5:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Shinigami: If you're using FF get the Adblockplus plugin AND the flashblock plugin.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[broli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 5:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[1/1 is a fraction right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[no its a scale.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major4Play]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 4:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[+1.  This is exactly where my mind went when I saw "fraction" in quotes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CtrlBurn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 4:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[which atom? sounds like 330?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA["Z510 processor, 1.1GHz and Z530 processor, 1.6GHz" (sic Inhand site)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[my windows xp cellphone!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[XP seems terribly outdated now... :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[richb93]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[There's a larger selection of similar Atom based SBC's available for perusal at the Small Form Factor Boards Conference site. <a href="http://bit.ly/Feo1I" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/Feo1I</a> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[@intel_stewart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pardon, but what is SBC?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorKaos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[do not bring politics into this please... Go find someone who cares..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wrong thread (blog).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Single board computer]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[When asked what they're secret was, InHand muttered something about an ARM Cortex microprocessor on the back of the board that does all the actual work.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ethana2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Friggin' English.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ethana2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is no place for racial hate, what did the English ever do to you ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major4Play]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 4:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Major4Play <br><br>He's referring to this mishmash we call a language.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 9:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[This seems like a good way to go for a home web server.  Small, easy to get out of the way, low power consumption, low performance.  Is it going to be cheap, though.  That's the kicker.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CtrlBurn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was more thinking about home automation computer...<br>(un)locking doors, controlling thermostat, lights, blinds, watering lawn. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 13th 2009 8:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't know power consumption on the competitors, but there's already Pico-ITX Atom-based motherboards. So this isn't the smallest (95mm x 114mm vs 72mm x 100mm). Marketing fail.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darkness]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 9:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Atom-based Inhand FireFly SBC promises netbook-level performance at a "fraction" of the power]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/atom-based-inhand-firefly-sbc-promises-netbook-level-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[I promised myself I'd pull myself away from the digihubverse whilst I was on vacation..but my wife is asleep, I'm wide awake and our hotel has access included in the price, as well as I having brought along a couple of i-capable gadgets..sigh It makes  it hard to stay totally disconnected. :/<br><br>Anywho, it will be interesting to see what the price-point of this item is. It's not going to be the cheapest or the smallest, but the power consumption versus capability ratio is nothing to scoff at. The nearest comparable product i remember off-hand (It's been a couple of years since I've discretely researched for a similar form-factor device. An Atom/Tegra combo might blast this out of the water, I don't really know...yet) was the FitPC - a AMD Geode powered device, which ran at around half the speed of this device and was about the same dimensionally along the two longest edges and a smidge thicker.(About 20mm for the Firefly and 30mm for the FitPC slim, so about 2/3 the thickness and roughly double the horsepower - not bad for a little over a year. Some progress. ;) )<br><br>Here is a spec comparison between the two:<br><br><a href="http://www.inhand.com/images/pdf/firefly-web.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.inhand.com/images/pdf/firefly-web.pdf</a> <br><br><a href="http://www.fit-pc.com/fit-pc1/fit-pc-slim-specifications.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fit-pc.com/fit-pc1/fit-pc-slim-specifications.html</a> <br><br>And here is a unboxing of the FitPC Slim model to get an idea of the dimensions of these devices. :<br><br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0XpoFlGDI0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0XpoFlGDI0</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stevenvdb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 13th 2009 1:54AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
