<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shit, I was really hoping to lace all of my DVD rips with DRM. Maybe next time!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GRAMMAR POLICE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 2:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA["illegally violated their right to restrict the use of their movies in digital form."<br><br>I didn't know Digital video Discs were analog.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 2:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[they didn't say they were analog<br>also, fyi, DVD is short for Digital Versatile Disc, but it's a common mistake]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Riley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 4:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[It used to be Digital Video Disc but the changed the name as they realized that it had other potential. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Puggs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 9:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought Real had faded away into obscurity years ago. You mean they're still around?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Preston]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm glad that realdvd has failed, there is no reason to have backups of my own DVD's to have DRM in any form.  There are many free ways to make backups of my own dvd's, so Real & the studios can both die off.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 2:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[Right, the studios "die off" and then what DVDs will you be copying, exactly?  Don't be stupid.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 9:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[What you dont understand that those free tools are still illegal as per the DMCA.  If Real would of won this lawsuit it would get the courts to agree that we have a fair-use right to copy dvds.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheZig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 12:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tell'em Hillary, RealDVD on very thin ice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spectracide]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[An entry level Kaleidescape system is $7999 so you dont need to make 9 billion a year to afford one.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[Clearly Engadget was basing it's humour about the high price of the Kaleidescape, implying that only workers of a higher price bracket would be able to afford such devices. Also, Engadget probably made this joke with full awareness of the actual retail value of one of said devices.<br><br>In other words, Greg - well, DDUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHH.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[monkfishbandana]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 6:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[A $7999 entry level Kaleidescape holds about 75 movies, that is over $100 per movie to watch in a single location. Add a mini player for another $1995 so you can watch in a second location. Kaleidescape is the Bentley of DVD management, they just made a more affordable Bentley mini. It is by far the best but not for the average consumer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[liver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 12:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[The judgment is a shame, but RealDVD would have died anyway due to the DRM and restrictions that were still in place. <br><br>We really need back the days of Sony (the OLD non-movie-company version of Sony) fighting the MPAA over Betamax. Today there is no notable corporate power fighting for fair use,  so we get the DMCA and worse. To make matters worse, Sony is, and Apple is becoming, a media company, so they have less interest in selling boxes people want vs. selling or renting movies.<br><br>A useful variation on anti-trust would be to make it illegal for content companies to sell playback hardware and software, and vise versa. That way there would at least be a balance of power of sorts. At one point there was faint hope that Intel and Microsoft might carry the fair-use torch, but the reality is that they have been more than disappointing at that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lens42]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 4:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[i can understand where the studios are coming from. this kind of software and/or a lack of DRM makes it really easy for me to use my $20 a month Netflix and rip a ton of movies and post them all over the place,  costing them tons of sales. even if I just do it on my own movies, that's like 8 a month on a slow month. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LAGal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 11:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[The judgment is a shame, but RealDVD would have died anyway due to the DRM and restrictions that were still in place. <br><br>We really need back the days of Sony (the OLD non-movie-company version of Sony) fighting the MPAA over Betamax. Today there is no notable corporate power fighting for fair use,  so we get the DMCA and worse. To make matters worse, Sony is, and Apple is becoming, a media company, so they have less interest in selling boxes people want vs. selling or renting movies.<br><br>A useful variation on anti-trust would be to make it illegal for content companies to sell playback hardware and software, and vise versa. That way there would at least be a balance of power of sorts. At one point there was faint hope that Intel and Microsoft might carry the fair-use torch, but the reality is that they have been more than disappointing at that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lens42]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 4:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[Perhaps someone can clear up my confusion, RealDVD is illegal , but Telestream can continue to sell drive in?  <a href="http://www.telestream.net/drive-in/overview.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.telestream.net/drive-in/overview.htm</a><br><br>What's the difference?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BuddyBoy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 5:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[Could be licensing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 9:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, that is definitely weird.<br><br>Probably falls into the category of (don't hate) : It's just Apple Software and their 8% market, so who cares.... for now. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Davis4ever]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[1. no one has sued  them yet<br>2. they are copying the dvd as it. in a disk image with all the copy protection included. from what I understand about RealDVD, it strips the protections. <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LAGal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 12:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[It would have been nice to see the gates of video media thrown open.  On the other hand, we all knew what the judgement was going to be.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GenKhan2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 11:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[Judge Patel is probably the single worst judge in America today. This is the same judge that presided and conspired over the systematic bilking of the Pacific States Steel retirees by the court appointed trustee. The corruption was so blatant that she and the trustee should both have spent the rest of their live in jail. The woman does not belong on the bench!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[machadodesign]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah! she belongs in the kitchen!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 2:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[I read through the transcripts for the DMCA exception arguments that the MPAA attempted to counter with the notion of 'video taping a computer screen' as the only means to attain a fair-use copy of protected content. Isn't this concept eventually defeated as we move towards cameras that have the ability to detect copy protected content? The direction the MPAA is going to 'eliminate the analog hole' includes camcorders and much like VCRs, camcorders will soon honor the very similar "Copy Never, etc" flags that are placed in content by means of a visual watermark. Their other claim that you may use 'screengrabber' software is also nullified by the restrictions imposed by dvd playback software as well as technologies such as the "Protected Media Path" present in Windows Vista and Windows 7. The MPAA said themselves that "if there is another way to copy the content without decryption then it should be used instead" but they lobby to close the very 'holes' they tell us to use. The DMCA appears to be an 'iron clad' case against any 'fair use' of copy protected content. This absurdness is attributeed<br><br>We all understand that the penalty for copyright infringement is severe (22k awarded for individual songs in the latest case as an example) so why do we need another law that does nothing more then make criminals of normal people who would otherwise be trying to express their fair-use rights? Distributing copyrighted content without consent of the copyright holder is already against the law and all the copy protection restrictions are not slowing down the trafficking of copyrighted content. Those who traffic content simply ignore this law and bypass these 'digital locks' on content with ease. When it comes to consumer benefit, the restrictions imposed on commercial content (DVDs, Blu-Ray, iTunes Video files etc) make it a less desirable alternative to even the paid-for bootleg content that does not impose limitations on how you can use the content after you purchase it. An average user would have to violate the DMCA to do something simple such as copy an episode of their favorite tv show off a dvd for use on his ipod verses buy a version of the digital content that has no restrictions (no digital locks) and be able to transfer the content to a different medium (such as the ipod).<br><br>I am no law professor but I understand the basis of copyright law and it permits the creation of a backup for archival purposes. If the 'fair use copy' exceptions are not amended to the DMCA and Real looses its case with the MPAA in regards to their REALDVD software (which indecently the case should be thrown out due to the previous case with the 10k jukebox company). Cant someone sue the Courts, MPAA, and even the Judge in the RealDVD case for ignoring the consumer side of copyright law?  98.99% of Americans are not FOR the DMCA. We need to ban together and collectively sue everyone who PUSHED the DMCA for violating OUR rights under the consumer side of copyright law. I doubt that there is a single american who does not work for the movie companies who would not join the fight agansed the DMCA. Most people don't even know what the DMCA is; Inform the UNinformed about how the DMCA makes it illegal for you to create a backup copy of content that you have the legal right to create.  The DMCA issues run deeper then DVD copying, the issue is being able to do as you please (without trafficking content) with purchased content.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheZig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 12:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[People do legally have "fair use" rights. However, any method used to bypass a DMCA protection scheme is treated as illegal in most countries. Essentially the "for your protection" schemes block your ways to exercise "fair use" in any form.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yaja]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 1:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dear Darren<br><br>Best use of the work trifilin' ever...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Col. Readily Apparent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[So A question for everybody, would it be illegal for me to create a set top box thats not an htpc, and have it virtually load a ripped dvd and stream it to my tv?  Remember now im not giving the ripping software im just allowing others to load it and play off a hard drive. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[They already have those.  My Popcorn Hour does this.  It will play DVD ISO files which I rip to my server using ImgBurn and AnyDVD.  Technically AnyDVD is illegal in the US, but I don't give a shit.  It's my DVDs I'm ripping to watch in my home.  I don't trade them with anyone.  It is just much easier to deal with 300+ movies using just a remote control, instead of having to go to a shelf full of discs.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crazyburns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 3:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, this is not illegal since you are not circumventing the copy protection. you are allowing already un-protected content to be displayed.<br><br>The DMCA addresses circumvention of copy protection.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 4:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[More bad news:<br><br>Kaleidescape loses appeal.<br><br><a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2351510,00.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2351510,00.asp</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/court-injunction-puts-sales-of-realdvd-on-ice-hopes-and-dreams/</guid><description><![CDATA[RealNetworks could promise a BJ from the hottest woman on earth with installation of their product, and I STILL wouldn't put their crap on my computer, no matter how cool it might be.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ZeroCorpse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2009 6:48PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
