<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is excellent and unexpected news... I had no idea a standard was in the works. Maybe some day we'll have quality sounding wireless speakers... some sweet day.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ash chapman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[Didn't know either. Good to hear.<br><br>But for Qi, I'd pronounce it "Key". It's shaped a little like one, serves as a key to powering up your device, and Starbucks won't try to sell me a vanilla one with cinnamon foam on top.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NHAnimator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[Starbucks might charge you to use one, though. Go in, grab a coffee, sit down and put your phone on the table and let it charge. Kind of like wifi hotspots, except for power.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Khav]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[If anyone would charge you for 5 watts, it would be Starbucks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ash chapman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[Qi? Really?<br>I like how someone in a marketing department somewhere can take new technology I am really excited about and make it totally uncool.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[King Biscuit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NHAnimator:<br><br>That would be the Japanese pronunciation of Ch'i (like in Aikido)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ShinyaAoki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 7:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[I actually think it's a brilliant name.  Yeah, admittedly a little bit cheezy, but hey I liked Gremlins even though it involved a cheezy quasi-mystical pet-shop in Chinatown.<br>Internal energy and all that...neat.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[the4thheat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 1:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wireless power is good, but what is the energy efficiency of the technolgy we're going to be looking at. If charging my phone wirelessly is going to end up taking 125% of the energy it would to charge by wire...well, I'll be sticking to wires. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OG_Phenix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[the Wright brothers only flew 120 feet on their first flight....its a good thing we all dont think like you]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[From My Cube]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[@From My Cube<br>But does everyone uses that airplane? No they wait for it to be stable and safe.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Heinz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, because energy conservation is perfectly analogous to flight. If we all thought like me we might...wait collectively for the technology to be efficient? I'm not knocking the tech itself, merely concerned about widespread usage if it is inefficient. Adopting to new tech just because it is new tech is as asinine as completely forgoing new tech because it is new tech. If we all thought like me, I'd imagine we'd take the time to objectively analyze whether a technology is ready to come to the mainstream. I'm sure when it gets here it will be able to power things wirelessly...whether it will do so without parabolic loss (thus increasing downstream cost to customers adopting the tech) remains another matter. So I guess if we were all like me, we'd wait and see before making a judgement call? <br><br>Oh, and if we were all like me, we'd likely be a bit more polite when we disagree with someone on the internet, despite the anonymity it provides us.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OG_Phenix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, but innovation is.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[King Biscuit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ever heard of induction cooking? A lot more efficient than traditional direct heat transfer cooking.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hmmwv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 3:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd like to know the assumptions behind how that 125% figure was calculated.  Most traditional chargers waste electricity just being plugged in.  I've heard these wireless chargers (not sure if it's this one) may know when a device is placed close by and only use full power while charging.  A wireless solution, though inefficient while charging, may not use much more energy than a typical wired one.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think Stephen Fry might have something to say about this...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[Between sessions of him sticking his beloved iPhone up his arse? I don't think he has the time<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[twinpeaked]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nikola Tesla would be facepalming right now.  It took us this long to 'develop' wireless charging !??!? Tesla was wirelessly transmitting energy to light lanterns MILES away from his lab.  We are so slow in the implementation of technology. <br><br><br>I wonder when his plasma cannon patent will be capitalized on...  (hint, hint, the government already has it....)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sacapuntas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[sacapuntas, <br><br>God forbid anyone is testing his Wardenclyffe Tower for nefarious and insidious purposes. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WindowsFTW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[Off topic...but saying you're using anything for "nefarious purposes" almost makes it sound cute. <br><br>I will use the M16A4 I was issued by the government...for nefarious purposes. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OG_Phenix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[You've been playing Ratchet & Clank games, haven't you?  I don't know of any other places where 'nefarious' carries anything but really dark and evil undertones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CtrlBurn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was wondering why one would conflate nefarious with cute until I read the Ratchet & Clank comment.<br><br>But for the record, never played Ratchet & Clank, but it sounds like an adorable game based on the last post. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WindowsFTW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 6:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[OG,<br><br>Oh, by the way, you do know what Wardenclyffe was being designed for right?<br>Unlike your M16A4 which was specifically designed as a tool of death and defense (hence intrinsically nefarious by definition -- especially if you're part of the anti-gun anti-war crowd), <br>Wardenclyffe on the other hand was being designed to serve humanity by transmitting electrical energy wirelessly across the Atlantic (and possibly the globe over).  <br>Wardenclyffe could have been used for nefarious and insidious deeds as well (just as can a pencil if I decide to poke someone in the eye with it), but Tesla was more altruistic than the creator of the M16A4 I'm sure.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WindowsFTW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 7:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now if they could use that in a laptop, that would really be something. Hope to see it in a lot of electronics soon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillermo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice thought but since this is inductive charging, that means electromagnetic field. That means potential if not outright certainty of scrambled hard drives. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ryan.robinson.75]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[It would however be a good if slow solution for netbooks and laptops with SSD's. <br><br>I say slow since they are talking about 5 watt devices.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ryan.robinson.75]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[If the magnetic field is strong enough to scramble the hard drive, then everyone better stay the hell away from it because it will kill someone (from flying magnetic debris).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suijin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[So is this purely for people who are too lazy to their devices in?   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[what does laziness have to do with it? are you so lazy that you drive a car instead of walking?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Demyanovich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[So a car is purely for people who are too lazy to walk? So a calculator is purely for people who are too lazy to calculate by hand? So a cell phone is purely for people who are too lazy to go over and talk to someone in person? So a PMP is purely for people who are too lazy to go to a concert/movie? You can say that for any piece of technology in existence.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, I'm saying that unless it's true wireless and can charge in my pocket than it's a wasted spec.  Setting something down on some special pad is not different than plugging it in to a wire.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[And you are too lazy to use all the words needed to pass off a coherent comment, R-Tard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Agent .25i]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA["No, I'm saying that unless it's true wireless and can charge in my pocket than it's a wasted spec. Setting something down on some special pad is not different than plugging it in to a wire."<br>Your too lazy to take it out of your pocket.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kehyu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apparently you are too lazy to type another word!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[elliiot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 3:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[I sense great Ch'i within your iPhone!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[This isn't really aimed at you JJ, but since you brought this up: I'm tired of people with bizarre notions of how to read English transliterating things incorrectly and expecting everyone to follow along.<br><br>1)	x[vowel] reads z[vowel] if it’s at the beginning of the word and ks[vowel] if it’s in the middle.<br>2)	q[non-u letter] should not be used, but if you must then it’s a k[non-u vowel sound]. qu makes kw<br>3)	putting apostrophes after or before letters does not in fact alter their sounds<br>4)	sh sounds are only ever made by the combination of letters sh, sch (if the words are of German origin) or ch (if the words are of French origin). No combination of zh- xh- x- z- jh- makes that sound<br>5)	 c- does not in fact make a variation on the tz/ts sound. unless the word is directly taken (usually a proper noun) from a language using the Latin alphabet it also does not make the ch- sound. it is read as s- if it is followed by e, i,  or y and c- if it isn’t.<br><br>So yes, thank you JJ, Chi or even Chee would be a good approximatino of that. Qi is not by any stretch of imagination.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[...well mine's powered by iForce 3.0™]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wickywills]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Mark:<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qi" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qi</a><br>Go away]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[601210]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Mark<br>It's not an English transliteration. Assclown.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sinbios]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 1:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Sinbois<br><br>I love how, at the end of his superior little pontification, Mark drops a typo...<br><br>Irony, justice, kharma or just too damn funny?...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DorianGray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 2:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[I refer you to Wade-Giles and Pinyin.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Valicore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 10:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah, but how many of the testers now have cancer?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[none, but for some reason the testers never have to sleep anymore]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Demyanovich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hooray for super-inefficient charging. I hear Mother Nature is thrilled!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope this is banned before they even begin shipping products. We literally just managed to develop some sort of minimum efficiency requirements for chargers and now they're going to start selling something way way more inefficient that may or may not be subject to any sorts of requirements.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[And the worst thing is - in order to actually benefit from the ease of use this provides, those chargers need to be plugged in 24/7. Modern phones remind you to unplug your charger when the phone is done charging, and I think at least a few people do that to save energy, but nobody will ever unplug a wireless charging mat...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[I, too, hope every new innovation is banned unless its first version follows the constraints of a long-standing, tested and refined old technology.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Khav]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[What was the fuel economy of the first automobile?  You have to start somewhere.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[drummerjoe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[*sigh*.  See THIS is why innovation stops...  People don't do research.<br>It is EXTREMELY efficient.  More so than a standard AC-DC power supply because it uses VERY minimal power when plugged in just to 'sense' nearby devices and, once discovered, it is far more efficient than wires.  Look at Tesla's notes and recent research.  Wires HINDER current-flow.  Wireless transmission is able to "beam" electricity directly to the divice with VERY little loss.<br>This WILL make "Mother Nature thrilled". :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vertigo1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[chain yourself to a tree and starve yourself to death.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/18/wireless-power-standard-almost-here-named-qi-of-all-things/</guid><description><![CDATA[@vertigo1, you actually believe that? LOL. Really, ROFL. I've studied electrical engineering for a couple of years, let me tell you this: energy transmission over induction is TERRIBLY inefficient compared to even a bad conductor, let alone copper.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 18th 2009 12:27PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
