<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[My G5 just broke, but I have no cash at all, I'm so sad I can't buy it! Thanks god the  flip-out LCD is back!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy Gun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apply for some of that bailout money!, or you could put the camera on credit, and freelance as an American Paperatzzi<br><br>With a name like Billy Gun, you gotza be a US of Aer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[meat_juice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Amen! I'm still using a G2. That the later G models lost the the swivel LCD was disappointing. This is a welcome return.<br><br>Not that I've got $500 sitting around to buy a new camera, either.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dagwud]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[@meat_juice, I'm in Brazil and It not easy to make deals here with a broken camera I guess someone broke it. My father gave the nick name "Billy Gun" when I was two year old - I think he watched too many western movies.. hahhaha..<br><br>@dagwud better days will came to us all..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy Gun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Billy Gunn: Yes, but I'd like to be young enough to remember them!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dagwud]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 1:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[The flip out screens are half the reason I have gone with Canon for my last three digital cameras. It is a fully unappreciated feature.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[asha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 5:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Like on the Sony Ericsson G900.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10minutehobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just looked over the specs at Canon USA... looks great all around, especially moving down in megapixels to improve high ISO noise. The only thing it is still missing for me is the ability to shoot video at 1080. If it had that, I'd buy my second G series in a heartbeat, but I think I'll wait for the G12.<br><br>Fraggle]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fraggle.Rock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where do you see this exact specification? All I can find out is that it shoots "HD" video. Did you find somewhere where it lists the exact video capabilities: 720p?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaxim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[okay I found it on the specifications page under "Time of Recordable Movies". <br><a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=144&modelid=19209#ModelTechSpecsAct" rel="nofollow">http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=144&modelid=19209#ModelTechSpecsAct</a><br><br>The max movie recording capability list is 640 x 480, but under the Canon site's "Features" tab, one of the slides say it can record HD movies. I don't think 640 x 480 is considered HD (720p is usually thought to be the minimum standard for "HD") which makes me think that the specifications page may not have the most up to date info.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaxim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA["If you long for the convenience of an advanced still camera that also creates superb movies, the new PowerShot G11 lets you record video in beautiful high definition."<br><br>Source: Canon G11 product page<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaxim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Jaxim<br><br>Yeah, I saw 'HD' thing too, and I would be (happily) surprised to see that 640x480 was not the limit. But seeing as the other new models listed varying levels of video resolution (e.g. 1280x720 for the SX20), and that the S90 shares the same sensor as the G11 and also lists 640x480... I'm not too hopeful.<br><br>Still, stranger things have happened]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fraggle.Rock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Flip-outs from Canon's have always been good. Still love my G6.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PCIV]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[So you knew it was real when the shots first leaked out?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope they put some decent optical zoom on this one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can you see if it has HD video recording?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaxim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[One of the features on the canon's website list it having HD video recording. I can't find the exact specifics but it sounds like it can record at least 720p - but that's only a guess. Still looking thru the site for answers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaxim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Movie clips  	<br>• 640 x 480 @ 30fps<br>• 320 x 240 @ 30fps<br><br><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0908/09081908canong11.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0908/09081908canong11.asp</a><br><br>It has a mini-HDMI port, but doesn't deliver HD clips.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xValentine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[640 x 480 @ 30fps doesn't seem like "HD". I consider 720p the bare min.<br>Maybe the specs have not been updated with the latest capabilities.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaxim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yep. 720p is the minimum HD.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xValentine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA["If you long for the convenience of an advanced still camera that also creates superb movies, the new PowerShot G11 lets you record video in beautiful high definition."<br><br>Source: Canon G11 product page]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaxim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 12:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like my G2 powershot--too bad it still works. = )   I'm sure this one will take awesome pix too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[umm....hello???]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[I loved my G2 as well, but I replaced it with a $250 A620 which completely outperformed it. I've had a G7 since late 2006, but will replace it with a G11 now that Canon has gone for noise reduction instead of the megapixel race.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[art.douglas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 7th 2009 3:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[i get one if it does 3200 iso nicely..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Kroke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can someone please explain to my WHY a flip-out display is soooo awesome?<br><br>Seriously.  How is it more useful to use the display like pictured in that first picture, than it is to have the display built in, under the viewfinder?<br><br>I guess it could be useful for taking myspace-angled shots of yourself, but that's it.<br><br>That said, obviously the camera has a lot of great features to offer, and I WANT.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crawdad689]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[if you're at a concert say and you want to raise your camera up as high as you can to get a shot you can flip the screen so you can see what you're shooting. I hate when people are constantly doing this at a show, but that's one example. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gooDs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not just the flip-out which is awesome, but in combination with the possibility to rotate it up and down. No need for a chair to stand on to shoot from above your head, or to crawl on all fours if you want to shoot from below.<br>I used it a lot on my Powershot G1, and I'm glad it's back.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can take high or low-angle shots that would be either difficult or impossible to shoot without the flip-out panel. I could hold my G3 over the heads of a crowd (I'm tall, so this is like 8'6" up) or shoot low subjects like pets. I desperately missed this feature when I switched to a DSLR (Rebel XT) and even the LiveView of my current 50D doesn't cut it. I'd kill to have a swing out, articulated panel on a DSLR.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dirk Belligerent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[The design reminds me of that very old canon, the one from before they went digital, I like it for some reason.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[If that thing had 10x optical zoom, I think I would be planning a trip to the store.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Acheson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[So, now you're going to the Bahamas instead?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did you guys like immediately buy it after its launch? if yes, that's fuckin crazy!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thank goodness Canon has drawn a line in the sand on this megapixel race!  10MP on a quality sensor is SO much better than trying to jam 14MP onto the same size sensor.  Who would have thought that image quality would finally be a priority again in a camera?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crimson400]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[With the new (Micro) 4/3s coming out and not being that much larger than this for about the same price, yet will have all the benefits of an SLR plus video, do you think this G-Series is still going to be as good a choice of a camera as it once was?  $500 is a lot to pay for a point and shoot...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[But the Olympus E-P1 is still $800-900, and has no tilting screen and slightly less zoom (I suppose you can stick a Panasonic 4/3 lens there for extra cost). And despite the excellent image quality, it still has its share of flaws - slow autofocus, no AF illuminator and flash. The E-P1 is bound to draw away many enthusiasts who can to spend as much as they want on cameras and would have gone to the G10 for their second camera, but despite being squeezed, there's still room for the G11. Much depends on the new sensor's performance. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[While micro 4/3 bodies are about the same size, once you attach anything but a pancake lens to them they're no longer at all pocketable.<br><br>The point of the G11 is for people who want a high quality camera but not need a separate bag for it which is something you're not going to get from an interchangeable lens camera simply because the lens can't retract into the body]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Perman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Since I own an LX3, my views are a bit biased. The new Canon G11 and S90 do have some good features (like the 4x zoom range on the S90), but not enough to make me want one. The reason I got an LX3 was the wide-angle (24mm), f/2.0 lens, up to 60 sec exposure, and the ability to add auxillary lenses, et. al. Neither of these Canon's hack it in these departments. Viva la LX3! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[About time they dropped the MP race and focus on low-light picture quality.<br><br>Among the high-end P&S released last year, only the LX3/D-lux 4 got it right.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xValentine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[To be honest i'm not impressed.  The 10MP CCD is an excellent idea but the lack of 1080p is a complete mystery to me.  I'd also prefer the f2 lens in the S90.<br><br>Missed a trick there, Canon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yup, Canon got it right going 10 megapixels. I guess they paid attention to the complaints that the G10 shoed noise artifacts at ISO 100. They had to wake up. It appears they did.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[I own a 400D and G9 and I must say that G9 feels like a 5D in the compact realm. A great companion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loocas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[What? No filter mount on the front yet? Get with it. That's the only thing I don't like about my G10 is that you can not put a polarizer on it. err.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[does the lcd rotates 360° ?? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ohmygosh82]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 2:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks hot. I like the double stacked setting dial on the right side.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ssoltero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 3:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks nice, but I got a G9 a while back, and I'm not too sure this is enough of a leap in quality to warrant the price tag. Especially since I picked up an XSi with an IS 18-55mm on closeout for 449.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bernardos70]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 6:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[The flip out LCD+10Megapixels are nice, but I think the G10 looks better.<br><br>What is the screen size? Also, whats up with the pictures on the mode dial?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Relyt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 6:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[If this has a decent (and large enough) sensor it could be Canon's best P&S in a while. I just ordered an A710IS off of ebay, 'cause their current lineup is just awful.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David M]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't wait for more details on the G11. I got the Panasonic LX3 instead of the G10 because I wanted a good fast lens for low light pictures. Unfortunately, that's all the LX3 is good at. It takes mediocre daytime pictures. Auto focusing is slow. Menu and controls aren't as intuitive as Canon's. The manual lens cover is really a buzz kill sometimes. Wide angle lens isn't really a big deal to me. And a few other nit-pick items. If the G11 image quality is a big improvement over the G10, I'm gonna sell my LX3.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[R]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 10:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was debating the G10 and LX3 as well. I think I'm glad I got the G10 even though 14MP was excessive. ISO 200 has almost too much noise for bigger prints. But with a little effort processing out the RAW and balancing the noise and softening effect of a noise reducer, it is possible to get some decent larger prints. There was always a lot of resolution to spare(too much). So, If the G11 has any less noise by it being 10MP it will be worth it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 4:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon PowerShot G11 hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/canon-powershot-g11-hands-on/</guid><description><![CDATA[HEY GUYS,<br><br>I've set up a small petition to motivate Canon to add HD video recording to next years G12.<br><br>Have a go - <a href="http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/CanonG12" rel="nofollow">http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/CanonG12</a><br><br>Thanks, Fraggle]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fraggle.Rock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 2:08AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
