<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[why wouldnt they do the right thing and give them a new camera rather than a refurbished one for the same price]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[From My Cube]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 3:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because its cheaper for them, duh. (do the right thing? Not in the U.S.A buddy)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 3:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[nikon isn't an american company, and the second recall is in europe. no idea why you're being america hate into this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Spaceman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can haz your monies.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 3:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bummer for those who got the duds, but at least nikon is taking some responsibility and resolving the issue, like straight away. If anything, this will teach 'em a lesson on QC with future releases. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spaz_1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 3:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lemon!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Giovanny F Viznay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[At least Nikon willing to admit they mess up. And they step forward to fix the problem as soon as it had had been discover. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[viclauyyc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 3:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[in this thread and in that article about the first recall, i'm seeing a lot of "at least they're doing the right thing and replacing defective units" comments. but honestly, that should be a given. the products shouldn't have been faulty in the first place. i know that the recall is better than nothing, but still, customers settling on "oh at least they're taking care of it" are, in my opinion, are being appeased much too easily. i'm not seeing canon, sony, pentax, or panasonic having any recalls on their competing models (correct me if i'm wrong), and quality control issues like these are what will (and should) lose customers for nikon. just saying.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 4:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, you may not be familiar with the terrifble autofocus issues on the 1D Mark III.  Or the hideous black dot problem with the 5D Mark II:<br><a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/uploadedimages/FCK/Image/REVERIE%20Still%20Photos/Vincent_Laforet_5D_MKII_MG_0403.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.usa.canon.com/uploadedimages/FCK/Image/REVERIE%20Still%20Photos/Vincent_Laforet_5D_MKII_MG_0403.jpg</a><br>Zoom in to 100% and look at the lights as they move to the right, up the peak on the bridge and down on the right hand side of the peak.  This is Canon's own pictures and that is totally unacceptable for a $3000 camera.<br><br>Did they do a recall???  No.<br><br>Canon doesn't do recalls.  Canon does "fixes".  They fixed the black dot problem by basically putting a bandaid over the black dots.  You can still see where they would have appeared(point light sources, specular highlights).  Not a very good fix at all.  I would have preferred to get a recall and have it fixed properly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 5:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[A Nikon tech support person was heard yelling over the phone: <br>"well then buy the Olympus E-620, see if I care!"<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekdroid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Touched with the +20 damage staff of fabrication, I dare suggest!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BigBirdUK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 4:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mr. Yuk is MEAN..... Mr. Yuk is GREEN!!!  My mom plastered the house with those when I was a kid in the 70's.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tivolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 5:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[haha yessss i was hoping someone else would recognize this.  i was about to comment "no one recognizes MR. YUK??" :(<br><br>then again, anybody under 25 is sure not to know what that is. i don't know why i know that at only 19.  chalk it up to way too much online time!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeesusfreek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 9:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Your announcement makes it sound like there's a second problem that affects previously recalled D5000s.  However, Nikon's service advisory (<a href="http://nikonusa.com/Service-And-Support/Service-Advisories/D5000-Service-Advisory.page" rel="nofollow">http://nikonusa.com/Service-And-Support/Service-Advisories/D5000-Service-Advisory.page</a>) makes pretty clear they simply found additional serial numbers affected.  If you already had your repair done, you should be good.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 5:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Both you and engadget are right. In addition to adding more serial numbers the Nikon statement says that some customers in europe who already had the recall done have to send in those same units again for a redo with a better "enhanced procedure."  Or in other words, a redo of the repair.<br><a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://nikonrumors.com/2009/08/19/official-statement-from-nikon-on-second-d5000-recall.aspx</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maxfli82]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[I had my second failure yesterday while on holiday. <br>Not a good experience when you have the chance to take some nice pics and the camera fails on you.<br>The problem is the time and effort it takes to take the damn thing back to be fixed every time. <br>I am really disappointed in this camera and will not recommend it to anybody because it is not reliable at all...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kmajohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2009 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am now on my 4th D5000, all been faulty.  Rang Nikon to have a moan, and they didn't want to know and suggested that I send my current camera to be repaired.   This would be fine except in the UK there is a 15 WORKING DAY turn round, and we have to pay postage to get it there!<br><br>2 out of the 4 cameras wouldn't switch on, so I got them replaced at high street store!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Smickers79]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 6:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would take the camera back for a refund, then buy another model. For not that much more you can get the D90.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ithurtswhenipee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2009 11:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[i have a d5000 that i bought on amazon in the us and the serial number checker says:<br><br>"We are sorry to inform you that your D5000 is affected by this issue and we recommend that you send it for preventative maintenance at your earliest convenience. Please click here to find a Nikon Service Centre close to you. We are sorry for any inconvenience this may cause you. If you have any further questions please click here for more information."<br><br>but the link for the service center only gives me european service centers.. calling nikon tomorrow.. this sucks..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Tang]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 12:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[This sucks for D5000 users who are affected. Nikon should offer some more incentive like a discount on future accessories or something for all the lost photo opportunities while the camera is in the shop. I bought a D90 recently and don't know what I would do if it didn't turn on when I went on vacation this summer in order to capture once-in-a-lifetime shots. Vacations are expensive, can't redo them exactly, especially lighting and weather conditions. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maxfli82]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 4:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm glad I didn't buy one.  I feel for the purchasers who come to expect good quality from a name like Nikon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The_WB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bought my D5000 at a local best buy in CA. and mine had to be returned twice. Guess its not just in europe!! I wonder how many more times i'll have to send it back.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kepamt2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 1:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bought my D5000 in August and it just stopped working yesterday. Nikon sent me a UPS label and I shipped it. Does anyone know that the recent turnaround time is?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dressmeister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2010 10:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dressmeister I just received a camera back today. Total of 12 days, including shipping both ways. But get this: IT'S NOT MY CAMERA!!!!<br><br>They sent me back a different camera. Different S/N, the works. I really, really hope it's a new one and not someone else's refurbished. My SD card from the old camera is taped to the body, so I suspect it was intentional.<br><br>Nikon will get a call tomorrow.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dressmeister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 9th 2010 9:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon issues statement on second D5000 recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/19/nikon-issues-statement-on-second-d5000-recall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dressmeister I'm on the phone with Nikon now. They have no idea where my camera went or why it was returned with a different S/N. The new camera seems brand new to the naked eye, and the S/N is 10,000 greater than my original S/N. So it certainly could be a new camera.<br><br>I don't quite understand why the turnaround time would be 12 days if they are simply replacing every D5000 that comes in.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dressmeister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 10th 2010 10:25AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
