<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[it's like a Mesh network topology!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Anderson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[That guy looks like Moses...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[El Capitan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[or Santa Claus considering that "oh-oh" thing he says]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aatnet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 3:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorta, there's already a lot of research in this direction - trying to make the hardware of a computer itself highly parallel.  The difficulty of this is not linking the processors together, but implementing the machine language (and compilers that create this) that allows for highly parallel operation.<br><br>The theory behind this:<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explicit_Data_Graph_Execution" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explicit_Data_Graph_Execution</a><br><br>A research processor that implements EDGE:<br><a href="http://wavescalar.cs.washington.edu/wavecache.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://wavescalar.cs.washington.edu/wavecache.shtml</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is cool but i wish the arm processors were more powerful. wouldn't writing software for this be hard since theres so many processors involved?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jay jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not hard that is a myth.  All developers have a PhD in mathematics so splitting a complicated logic process and synchronizing across 8-256 cores it is a piece of cake.  German chocolate cake.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 7:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[Embarassingly parallel problem then yea it's easy. Inefficient solution to a complex problem then it's fairly easy. A good, efficient solution to a complex problem then it's not easy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ilh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 10:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[I get the impression from "They autonomously communicate, distribute processing power and programming, and even isolate faulty neighbors -- when one of the cells crashes, it won't bring the whole cluster down with it." that you load the code into the 'cloud' of cores, and   let them do the sorting out - no need to worry if you've got 2, 10 or 100.  <br><br>However, whilst the redundant nature of the beast is handy, I don't see why people are going to need the parallel processing aspect - You're probably going to use another solution if you need more computing power than say 2-4 of these clustered together provides.<br><br>One to watch though - I'm sure some bright spark will identify a need....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eldiablo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 1:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[So basically this is the same idea as Creative's Zii "stem-cell computing". Yawn.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Libb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, except with slower older processors.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cory]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[It seems if you want software that works with this, than you must rethink software on a fundamental level. How it works and how WE see the data. If this is based of off cells, than the software should be self evolving. Rather than software that is designed on legacy interfaces and such. We need to come up with a new solution that can make this hardware work better for us. Basically we should not try and make this hardware just recreate the current OS environment we are already used to. It should also possibly use something else as a visual interface device rather than a moniter. Perhaps we could use 3d goggles that are floating around? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow amazing!<br><br>I just can't wait to get one of these and watch each board tell the other to flash different colours by checking the other one!<br><br>In all serious-ness though, I do understand whats going on here, and why its significant. I just don't see any reason that this couldn't be achieved with a couple of desktop computers anyway. This sort of thing is nothing special running on made-for-purpose hardware. The real ingenious is making this stuff run on existing hardware.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Skyride]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks neat, but this sounds a lot cooler than it likely is.  They hooked up some low power processors and wrote a firmware which supports ICSP.  <br><br>I'm sure it was difficult.  But, it's been done.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[enlightnin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 7:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[Make them smaller, faster, and able to connect in 3 dimensions.  Then I think we're onto something.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dante of the Inferno]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 8:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[From my understanding of ARM-based boards, these types of slower-speed processors are intended for embedded applications where an entire PC would be overkill.  I could see how developing an auto-detecting and apparently easy to use method of setting up parallel processing networks for slower processors could be very useful.  Imagine, your microwave could  communicate with your freezer, letting you know when your freezer is low on its stock of hot pockets.<br><br>Sure, simply looking in your freezer could immediately provide the answer, but 50 years down the line, we are all going to be so fat from eating hot pockets all day that we won't bother to get up unless we know there's a hot pocket waiting for us.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Price]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 10:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[Haaaaaaawt Pockets! <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9c9lAfXQHs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9c9lAfXQHs</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 10:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Liquidware announces modular, scalable Arm-based motherboards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/liquidware-announces-modular-scalable-arm-based-motherboards/</guid><description><![CDATA[Connection Machine (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connection_machine" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connection_machine</a>) even got the groovey LEDs :-) The CM itself was very heavily influenced by the ICL DAP in the 70s. I also remember one of the home computing mags in the 80's giving details of how to build a farm of Zilog Z80s to compute the Mandelbrot set in parallel. More power to their elbows. Eventually we will hit a point where bespoke hardware is required as we finally hit the wall on Moores Law. Even language specific processors are making a comeback (OK not much but someone is touting a "Java Machine") dreamy memories of the Japanese 5th Gen projects :-) It's just more fun having a bit of variety and a bit of asynchrony will keep a programmer on their toes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kuriousoranj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 5:07AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
