<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[1.21 gigapixels?!!?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Badger_badger_badger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great Scott!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[omg doc you're still alive ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JehxOne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[I want Terra Pixel for my mobile camera ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR House]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dont matter, I bet the lens will be crap and no autofocus!<br><br>ZING!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[meat_juice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://lifeinmegapixels.com/fullscreen.php?location=bath" rel="nofollow">http://lifeinmegapixels.com/fullscreen.php?location=bath</a><br><br>1.3 gigapixels]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[avianasian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 11:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've got just what they need!<br><a href="http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/7595/00029910.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/7595/00029910.jpg</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RioRyan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 12:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[@RioRyan  nayyy... THIS <a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/51/143757826_3307362f31.jpg?v=0" rel="nofollow">http://farm1.static.flickr.com/51/143757826_3307362f31.jpg?v=0</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eugene Action]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2010 1:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Heywatchitbuddy Where we're going, we don't need film.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crimrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2010 1:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[DANG.... and people are wishing for a iPhone camera thats higher then 4 Megapixels....<br><br>the us army sure does have high expectations...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, because more megapixels in the iPhone will sure make the camera much better...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Patriks7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[A giant taco.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[E C S Sucks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[He was just waiting for an excuse to find out what a vagina looks like]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lawyer bird]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[How is babby formed with 2.3 gigapixels?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ED]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 7:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[62 square miles on 2.3 megapixels? Something ain't right.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[GIGApixels]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[The story said megapixels the second time, it needs to be changed.<br><br>Someone ain't used to saying gigapixels :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[actually, the camera would have a series of sensors at 2.3 each.  with enough, you'd have a camera capable of 2.3 gigapixel images.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thats GIGApixels.....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Shanahan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 10:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA["The key bit, however, is of course that 2.3 megapixel sensor"<br><br>Should be giga :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ditto  :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tritto.<br><br>Or... Uh, something.<br>-Taylor]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor. Yes, Taylor.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gigady gigady..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 8:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[2.3 megapixel sensor on a 2.3 gigapixel camera. Read your articles before posting them engadget people.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave G.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[That will never happen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Joseph<br>I almost roasted you for your comment, thinking you meant that a 2.3 gigapixel camera will never happen. boom, close to being roasted.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[garrenteed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[@scratchfury  <br><br>Yeah, and 640Kb is all the memory anyone will ever need.<br><br>"That will never happen"... famous last words.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trexx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2010 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[What kind of memory/busses/etc are they using that can handle that much data that fast?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[was asking myself the same question. must be a NASA processer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Monkey with glasses]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[*Dr. Evil Voice:*<br><br>I want infinity BILLION pixels!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[a.farzin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br><br>And all I wanted was frickin sharks with frickin lasers on them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SEscobedo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2010 11:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[yay w8 for terapixels]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[avianasian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 11:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well eventually they're bound to hit the point where the sensor for each pixel would have to be smaller than the wavelengths of visible light and making any more just won't help. That or the cameras will have to be friggin' ginormous]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tin foil hat..Pah! The more high tech they go the lower I go..My hat is now made of soil and grass..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Want someone to start complaining that simply upping the number of pixels won't help.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DirtyVegas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Simply upping the number of pixels wont help. Nothing but a marketing trick to fool terrorists who don't know any better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RMN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 9:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA["The key bit, however, is of course that 2.3 megapixel sensor"<br><br>Or rather, the scores of them that need to be taped together to get the total resolution up to 2.3 gigapixels.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 5:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now they just need a 35964p (33.3 x 1080p) TV monitor with 3D support at base, so they can shoot and watch XXXXXXXXHD p0rn!<br><br>Life is good.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WindSlash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Place on the ceiling.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Monkey with glasses]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[OVER 9000 (gigapixels)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[181]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[I emphatically disagree with your misleading rhetoric. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DanielT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 12:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[WTF does the Army want with arial survellience?  They couldn't even get the FCS to work right!<br><br>Hey Army, stick to kicking in doors and let the pros (USAF) handle UAV technology, K?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[helixtimestwo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[There is a rap-gangsta related joke I want to make here, but it would probably get me banned.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AntoineBugleboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[OH come on! tell it already...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[big_psirex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 9:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[In 20 years this will be in the iPhone and it still won't be enough for the haters. LOL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[You make no sense.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[u have the same name as i do<br><br>and why do i always have to confirm and type in my email + password, cant i just login?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[avianasian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 11:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ack! Just when we thought the megapixel race was over, they start the gigapixel race!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shiny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wouldn't a Film-based surveillance camera still provide more Gigapixel goodness? I was told that despite digital photography's advances - we're still not yet able to match the Gigapixel equivalent that you can get with film.<br>From Wikipedia:<br><br>" Many professional-quality film cameras use medium format or large format films. Because of the size of the imaging area, they have higher resolution than the current top-of-the-range digital cameras. It is estimated that a medium format film image can record around 50 megapixels, while large format films can record around 200 megapixels (4 × 5 inch) which would equate to around 800 megapixels on the largest common film format, 8 × 10 inches "<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_versus_film_photography" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_versus_film_photography</a><br><br>But then again, I'm probably wrong since I'm talking about consumer level photography equipment.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[someone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US Army wants 2.3 gigapixel camera for aerial surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/20/us-army-wants-2-3-gigapixel-camera-for-aerial-surveillance/</guid><description><![CDATA[There's a very good chance that the images will be sent ASAP to some command location.  Can't do that with film ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cesium]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2009 6:32PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
