<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[For a $700 camera it sure LOOKS cheap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cruizerzwei]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 9:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, it looks like one of those toys that squirt you with water when you press the shutter button.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 10:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[For the price being<br>I would rather take a PEN, it's more fun.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nDy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 9:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shit you can't get one......<br>But anyway this camera is not overpriced but terribly designed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nDy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 9:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Fixed focal-length, not fixed focus. Big difference!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Shiro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 9:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, I was a little confused there.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 9:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[What if it's both?<br><br>Landscapes only?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LloydChiro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dissapointing news on the noise - there's a definite market for real quality prosumer compacts, but not if they have to put up with shoddy image quality.  At least back in the days of 35mm, the smallest compacts and the biggest SLRs all shot on the same size frame of whatever quality film you chose, so there was no reason why a good compact (and a good photographer) couldn't match the output of an SLR.<br><br>With digital that just doesn't seem to be the case - if it's a compact camera it must use a smaller sensor and have worse quality.  I'm not sure why that's the case to be honest.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 10:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hm, maybe because it's not easily pulled off in a way that puts out a mass-compatible product at mass-compatible prices. The Sigma DP Series comes at a bearable price, but it is not really mass-compatible in any way — and I guess if Sigma changed it (speed, screen, better low light performance with short exposures, whatever YOU dislike about it), it would be two or three times its price. And how many $2000 compacts will you sell?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bad Beaver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 4:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok, why does the scary Palm Pre actress have to be in Engadget's advertising? My PTSD is already bad enough from the one time I saw a vagina. Diazepam ASAP!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DanielT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 10:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Still doesn't compare to the LX3. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 11:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Word.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LloydChiro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[You have to understand, GRD is a cult digital point and shoot. With the fix 28mm (and now f/1.9!) it's perfect for street snap and lomo style pics. I call it the "designer point n shoot"....<br><br>The black body is full meta btw. You call it cheap looking, I call it under-state and low profile design - which btw hasn't change for 3 generations. Just look up GRD I II, and III. They all look identical which I think is brilliant.<br><br>Yes I am a GRD fan. :)  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[george]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 11:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can't you do that with any old crappy point and shoot?<br><br>What's the perfect walk-around street camera?  The one you have with you, which for me the Motorola Q.  God help me.  Maybe I can start my own Motorola Q cult.  Did you know it can shoot movies?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LloydChiro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA["The sole blemishes found were the price (£529 / $699) and noise issues beyond ISO 800"<br><br>...oh, and having a fixed focal length...<br><br><br>And for the record, "sole" is used in place of "single."  You can't have more than one sole blemish.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jorvay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[The nice! I was spoiled by Sigma, so small sensor compacts usually only get a "meh" out of me. Yet if I was sure that the DP Series was not for me (they are demanding), I'd pick this up. I really like Ricoh's designs. They are pure and focus on the essentials. They don't look or feel like toys and are also not made extra heavy to lure you into thinking they were hewn from a solid piece of metal — like certain other makers' products.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bad Beaver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 2:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Should have been 24mm equivalent for the price. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[peterjohndean1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 4:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Very fast prime lens = low light shots without the flash]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[futurepastnow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 7:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because when I think "thorough" I imagine a subjective review of a camera with no comparison between competing models.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Mama]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2009 10:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[I used to have a GRD (mk I) and they are nice cameras, although that early model was slow as hell for saving RAW files! The fixed focal length should give better IQ than it does but the buttons are great and it's zero shutter lag for street photos is awesome! They seem to have improved a few things on the newer models but... After seeing the images from the Panasonic LX3 the new Ricoh seems a bit boring and inferior. <br><br>The LX3 has better high ISO performance, a wider lens, a bit of an optical zoom, actually has exposure bracketing (although still a bit crap). The f/2.0 lens is not vastly different from the f/1.9 of the Ricoh. The LCD is not as high res and it doesn't quite have the Ricoh's 180 second long exposure mode but it's a much nicer looking camera that costs a bit over half the price of the Ricoh. For me the Ricoh fails in too many areas to justify that massive price, if I can find one, my next purchase will be the LX3.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SomeGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 22nd 2009 7:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Most of the commenters here might as well be waving a placard that says "You should probably ignore my input, mainly because I have almost certainly never taken a great photo in my life and have no intention of ever learning to do so."<br><br>The GR series is not without its flaws, and a very specific sweet spot - but if you think it looks cheap (read: should be shiny, and have stickers on it) and wish it had a zoom lens, there are certainly cameras out there that will suit your needs better. This camera is for photographers, not gadget hounds.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[johnny_rozzer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2009 3:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks great but expensive, unfortunatly, I had a very bad experience with Ricoh when I brought back my camera covered by the waranty to fix the zoom: Ricoh didn't want to cover this repair and asked me 50% of the price of the new cam! So not only Ricoh sales expensive cameras, but if you have any problem with it even during the waranty period, forget it! I advise to buy other brands such as Panasonic or Canon, where you should not face this kind of issue.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[klein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2009 10:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh GR Digital III hits the review bench, collects plaudits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/ricoh-gr-digital-iii-hits-the-review-bench-collects-plaudits/</guid><description><![CDATA[Stay away from Ricoh !<br>These features seem interesting, unfortunatly, Ricoh is a very bad company if you have any problem during the warranty period; they refused to cover the fixing of the zoom that didn't work. Not only it ruined my vacations because I could'nt take pictures, but Ricoh asked me 50% of the price of the new cam! So I advise to buy other brands such as Panasonic or Canon, where you should not face this kind of issue.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[klein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2009 10:16AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
