<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bummer...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeatrix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 8:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[So a DSLR on the cheap that has better features than the Canon 20D from just a few years ago that still isn't cheap? Well I'll be]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neofolklore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 8:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[does this have backlight CMOS?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ET]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 8:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you meant back-illuminated CMOS sensor, then no.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Willen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 8:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[It doesn't even have a CMOS sensor, it has a CCD.  Strangely enough, Canon recently moved from CMOS to CCD in their G11, citing better low-light performance.  But more often then not, CMOS performs better then CCD in low-light due to NR and A/D processing being on the sensor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Temple]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 9:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[Look at the small diameter of the glass in that lens. It's almost a pinhole camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LondonConsultant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 9:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's the new DT 30mm F2.8 macro SAM lens. Par for the course for that type of lens.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Willen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 9:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[I searched a bit, it's the a500 and a550 that will have the new COS.  I still own the A100 and it suck big time.  I'll wait for an upgrade.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ET]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 10:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[Check out the sample photos on dpreview.  I have seen less noise on $200 point and shoots.  That's what happens when you keep piling on the megapixels but the sensor itself is no good.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 8:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[Buy new glasses. What you say is ridiculous.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bluecold]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 9:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[Plain stupidity.  The APS-C sized sensor that is in this camera is has an area of 370mm^2, your $200 point-and-shoot has a sensor size around 38mm^2.  This is close to a factor of 9-10x advantage this A380 will have over a P&S in light-sensitive surface area.  Even with 14MPs this A380 has far larger photosites then any P&S.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Temple]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 9:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[Throw stats all you want, my eyes see loads of snow static.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 9:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[>>Throw stats all you want, my eyes see loads of snow static.<br><br>Because you're clueless and don't know what you're talking about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Boudu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 11:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[This isn't bad noise?  <br>Plenty of light here but she looks like someone is beaming her up to the Enterprise.<br><a href="http://a.img-dpreview.com/gallery/sonydslra380_samples/dsc00237.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://a.img-dpreview.com/gallery/sonydslra380_samples/dsc00237.jpg</a><br><br>ISO800 that's just terrible<br><a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/2300-6501_7-10001356-3.html?s=0&o=10001356&tag=mncol;page" rel="nofollow">http://reviews.cnet.com/2300-6501_7-10001356-3.html?s=0&o=10001356&tag=mncol;page</a><br><br>This cam should almost not even bother to do ISO3200.  I have seen compact cams that can still do way better in low light.  <br><a href="http://www.photoreview.com.au/reviews/digitalslr/A380_DSC0247_night_ISO3200.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.photoreview.com.au/reviews/digitalslr/A380_DSC0247_night_ISO3200.jpg</a><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 2:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jason.. just stop embarrassing yourself. No P&S can rival a DSLR in terms of low noise levels, save for a few Fujifilms.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 7:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[While the lack of video isn't a major issue, anything non-Canon/Nikon already has an uphill battle, with their market penetration and lens lineups. The fact that the ISO performance is poor above 400 is inexcusable in this day and age. I expect ISO400 on my dSLR's to be virtually indistinguishable from ISO100. If they can't get at least that right, no amount of swiveling screens will make the camera a proper contender.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Igor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 9:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[As an avid Sony DSLR shooter, I was sad to see this latest batch released with little to no improvements over the predecessors.  If anything, the A380 is a step backwards from the A350 with worse ergonomics and cheaper plastics.<br><br>Hopefully the rumored A500 and A550 will be the next step forward for the APS-C sensor Sony DSLR's I've been waiting for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 9:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've briefly used this camera and it felt better in my hand than I expected from just looking at it from photos. The location of the memory card slots to the left of the LCD is pretty unusual for a DSLR--I kept looking at the grip side of the camera for them. The lack of dedicated buttons for some functions is a bit distressing but most people moving up from a point-and-shoot won't miss them.<br><br>The live view function is still the camera's selling point. The dedicated switch to turn it on and the use of fast phase detection focus makes the a380's LV the most usable IMO. Nikon at least has a dedicated button for activating LV, but contrast detect focus is too slow for quick shots. Activating Canon's LV mode is pretty obtuse (improved from older models, but still not great), and it also (still) feels tacked on.<br><br>It's too bad that the image quality didn't improve from the a350 (it's still miles better than a P&S camera). Especially since the new kit lens is much nicer than the old 18-70mm DT.<br><br>Not a bad entry level DSLR, but it needs an under-the-hood overhaul.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Willen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 9:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Alpha 380 gets lukewarm reviews, must be someone's perfect bowl of porridge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/sony-alpha-380-gets-lukewarm-reviews-must-be-someones-perfect/</guid><description><![CDATA[That thing looks like a toy.  Does it dispense candy?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LloydChiro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2009 12:40PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
