<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh I'm sorry I don't play Pokemon]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Manuel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pika! Pikapika!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chocolate Express]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[*facepalm*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[i.c. weiner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 12:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't get it. What am I missing?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 12:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[chu!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FoxKenji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 3:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm getting too old to understand Engadget comments...<br><br>Anyway, the perfect u4/3 would be Panasonic DMC-GF1's razor-sharp brains in the Olympus E-P1's cute body.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LondonConsultant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 3:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I seriously hope comments here don't start looking like they do at icanhazcheezburger.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ddub]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 6:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I believe it's an xkcd reference. It's sort of a way to blow someone off and make fun of them at the same time. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JTM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 10:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Put it in an IPHONE!  I'm kidding.  Downrank me, please.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iFargle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[With pleasure.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Badger_badger_badger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[-faster AF<br>-built-in flash<br>-higher res LCD<br>-add a black edition]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xValentine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Firmware 1.1 comes September 15th, it's main feature is faster AF. :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spyker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[All those already available with the GF1]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR House]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[GF-1 is what you just described.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[The GF1 isn't out yet. The GF1's optional EVF is crappy. The GF1 doesn't have in-body IS.<br><br>So far, I'd rather have a Panasonic, I think their firmware features are better. They are getting very, very close to what I want in a camera with the GF1.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[did I ?<br><br>;)<br><br>But wouldn't be nice if the GF-1 has in-body IS ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xValentine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 12:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[In honor of the old Olympus Pen series camera with the addition of inbody IS, this should be renamed E-PenIS.<br><br>Now let's see how more cute it could be!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zfurie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 1:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[The problem is that said IS takes up a lot of internal space. Leaving little to no room for the flash's relatively large capacitor. (at least without increasing the size of the body)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 1:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Give me a 4-6 megapixels with really clean high ISO shots, and an f2-2.8 pancake wide angle lens in that small of a package, and I'll give you $900 for it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Battags]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[maybe in a few years' time when they are done with the megapixel rat race!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ashok pai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 12:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[The megapixel marketing race doesn't apply to the Olympus E-P1 or Panasonic GF1 and GH1 since they have DSLR-sized sensors (4/3") which are huge compared to the tiny sensors used in most point and shoots (1/2.33") and even the advanced point and shoots (1/1.7"). For a better explanation see the section "Digital SLRs with many pixels are okay." of the page:<br><br>    6 Megapixel the best compromise between pixel count and sensitivity for Consumer cameras<br>    <a href="http://6mpixel.org/en/?page_id=32" rel="nofollow">http://6mpixel.org/en/?page_id=32</a><br><br>Another good way to compare is to look at:<br><br>    Digital Photography Review's camera database <br>    <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs.asp</a><br><br>which lists the "Pixel Density" for each camera. They talk about Pixel Density here:<br><br>    Pixel Density: when Moore is less<br>    <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08070301pixeldensity.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08070301pixeldensity.asp</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dz-015]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 2:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds like you are a customer for the Panasonic's DMC-GF1 with 20mm/f1.7 lens. The kit goes for $900. (Eying it myself.)<br><br>High ISO isn't as detailed as in Canikon, but it's for 99% cases is as good.<br><br>But sorry, it's 12MP.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 3:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Chu!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chocolate Express]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[cut the price in half]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ddub]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Twice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 1:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Then keep my $0.25.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LordFarkward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 3:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[and give it to me for free]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 5:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Make the dumb optional viewfinder an optional *electronic* viewfinder like that Panny has so it works with all lenses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[futurepastnow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Have you seen how much the optional viewfinder costs???<br><br>I already checked - its MRPS is $199.<br><br>If I'd buy GF1, I guess my greed would force me to learn to love the LCD composing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 3:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[so this is the leader of the new 4/3rds, and in photography image quality is everything--and this new camera produces "satisfactory" images?  That's like a C- or D+, right? I expect new tech like this to produce superior photo quality.   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rtdunham]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[They are superior if you compare them to the same sized cameras eg G10/G11 etc, satisfactory if you compare to dslrs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Newone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 1:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[It produces very good image quality. <br><br>Engadget is great for gossip, but if you want a real in depth review of something that isn't an iPhone, go somewhere else. This comment about satisfactory image quality as well as the whining about resistive displays(with the N900) and some of the other things are getting kind of annoying.<br><br>DPreview did a thorough test and rated image quality as being better than previous 4/3rds and as good as entry level SLRs from other manufacturers. It loses to the GH1, although that costs twice as much. <br><br><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/OlympusEP1/page31.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/OlympusEP1/page31.asp</a><br><br>Click through the next pages to see comparisons to other SLRs, although they do point out that at the time of the review their RAW converter wasn't working properly so once Adobe updates ACR the quality should get even better. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 1:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[What I'm really curious about is how this camera compares to Sigma's DP series.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Markarian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 11:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Squeezing a flash in there would be nice, too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[futurepastnow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh I'm sorry I don't play Pokemon]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Manuel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mos def needs a higher res screen.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KyotoKid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah right, mos def rocks 1080p on the reg buddy. he's doin just fine...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[all things considered]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 12:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[deccangroove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 3:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Alright, with the new Panasonic out there has been a lot of speculation here.  While the Panasonic is a fine camera in its own right, it is a different beast, designed for different users (also ones with more money).  The Panny is more a generalist camera than the Oly with a faster AF and pop-up flash.  The Oly is more the hobbiest/professional camera with its in camera IS.<br><br>What would I like?<br><br>Fast AF would be nice.<br>Lightroom support - required - coming soon.<br>Built-in Flash? They are useless for anything except snapshots - first thing I turn off.<br>Focus Confirmation for Manual Focus - would also be nice.<br><br>Other than that, it is a pocket camera with 720pHD video and images quality close to the Canon 5DMII.  What's to complain about?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Sills]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh, I can't wait for Lightroom/Aperture support. I always hate this with new cameras... RAW never works. And as I've mentioned, the firmware in 2 weeks should speed up the AF.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spyker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[A viewfinder would be fantastic. It'd have to be electronic, but that would be OK if it were high-res enough. Right now, though, the selection of micro 4/3 lenses is *really* tiny, and the range regular 4/3s lenses isn't much better (and kind of expensive). That's the imperative part of the package.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reagan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[viewfinder is what stopped me from buying it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Boucher]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 11:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[After using a DSLR for sometime I too can't imaging using a camera without a proper viewfinder.<br><br>Though I have used for two years before Canon's P&S which didn't have viewfinder - and it worked somehow.<br><br>Before buying, I want to find some exhibition where I can play with the camera for at least 10 minutes - to get the feeling whether it can be used without viewfinder or not.<br><br>Folks from fourthirds-user.com mentioned that there is a barrier - <a href="http://fourthirds-user.com/2009/06/olympus_pen_ep1_initial_handson_review.php" rel="nofollow">http://fourthirds-user.com/2009/06/olympus_pen_ep1_initial_handson_review.php</a> - "there is no viewfinder! [...] you get used to it."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love my E-P1. I just wish it had a high resolution screen.<br><br>Other than that, it does just what it was meant to do. It doesn't need a viewfinder, because it's not that kind of camera. Sure it took me a while to get used to using the screen (I'm so used to my film SLR and DSLR!) but now it just feels right. The AF is a little slow, but an update comes out this month (15th) that should speed that up. A flash isn't needed, since I HATE built in flashes and would rather use a hot shoe flash on any camera. The photo quality is pretty much on-par with my DSLR, the high ISO shots are good, the built in IS and dust reduction is sweet, and I don't think I could ask for much more. This camera is something new, and I hope Olympus and Panasonic work hard to make m4/3 something big. I can't wait for some new lenses to come out.<br><br>I'm getting a four thirds adaptor next week and I can't wait to try out my ZD lenses.<br><br>Oh, and DPreview has a pretty good review of the cam: <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusep1/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusep1/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spyker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think may people felt burned when the actual product looked nothing like the mockup prototype that was presented to the world:<br><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08092208olympus_micro_four_thirds.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08092208olympus_micro_four_thirds.asp</a><br><a href="http://a.img-dpreview.com/news/0809/Olympus/mft1.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://a.img-dpreview.com/news/0809/Olympus/mft1.jpg</a><br><br>People were also told that it would be a metal body, and it ended up being a thin metal veneer backed up by a solid plastic housing.  That is why it looks somewhat cheap to people in the know.  Its like those 'stainless steel' fridges you see at Home Depot that are on discount because someone dented them and now they look like crap.<br><a href="http://photorumors.com/2009/06/17/the-guts-of-the-m43-olympus-e-p1/" rel="nofollow">http://photorumors.com/2009/06/17/the-guts-of-the-m43-olympus-e-p1/</a><br><br>Similarly, the lens too came in for complaint being too plastic-y.<br><br>My big complaint on video performance was that the AF was very noisy.  There were some videos on the net where the AF sounded like crushed glass.  60fps @ 720p would also be great.<br><br>Finally, how could they not sell a black version?  The aesthetics of the finger grip are also somewhat strange.  It just looks like a decal that was slapped on.<br><br>Retro form factor yes, but fails in the details...<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[keithwwalker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[OLED Display<br>Flash <br>ViewFinder<br>....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Little a]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[i would smash it with a rock, or hammer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Eggy weggs!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daniel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[smaller lens. it's ugly- plain out ugly]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[asoccer345]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/how-would-you-change-olympus-e-p1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bigger lens gathers more light equaling better images.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MacBandit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 5th 2009 12:02AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
