<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Samsung's ultraslim ST45 digital camera is sadly devoid of clowns</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Samsung's ultraslim ST45 digital camera is sadly devoid of clowns</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's ultraslim ST45 digital camera is sadly devoid of clowns]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I blind or does it not mention the zoom? When they can make a tiny camera with more than a 3x zoom (more like 10x), then maybe I'll get into their tiny Asian chick electronics. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mjayhunt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 10:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's ultraslim ST45 digital camera is sadly devoid of clowns]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</guid><description><![CDATA[How's this? 1.5 in thick, 12x zoom from Canon. The very highest zoom compact P&S.<br><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/canon_sx200is.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/canon_sx200is.asp</a><br><br>Or there's the Fuji F200EXR which is really nice. It is 0.9 in, and still has 5x zoom & great low-light performance.<br><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/FujiFilm/fujifilm_f200exr.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/FujiFilm/fujifilm_f200exr.asp</a><br><br>You might be interested in dpreview.com's 'Compact Super Zoom Camera Group Test'.<br><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/q209grouplongzoom/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/q209grouplongzoom/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 10:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's ultraslim ST45 digital camera is sadly devoid of clowns]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like it would break fast.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 10:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's ultraslim ST45 digital camera is sadly devoid of clowns]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm. The Casio EX-S10 is slightly thinner (]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nanowoodward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's ultraslim ST45 digital camera is sadly devoid of clowns]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</guid><description><![CDATA[weird - my comment got cropped. <br><br>I'll repeat: <br><br>Hmm the Casio EX-S10 is slightly thinner (< 15mm). anyone know of an even thinner point n' shoot? thin don't make a cam, but it sure makes a sexy cam! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nanowoodward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's ultraslim ST45 digital camera is sadly devoid of clowns]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a Casio and am very pleased with the proformance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeffstonebasf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's ultraslim ST45 digital camera is sadly devoid of clowns]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/samsungs-ultraslim-st45-digital-camera-is-sadly-devoid-of-clown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Only a few more generations and these types of cameras will be fully integrated into phones.  There are a few already but once an iphone level device gets a 10+megapixel camera it's all over.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Avaj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 11:42AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
