<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not sure about the Sherwood/Class D part but looks like an interesting device for sure.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Icehawk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 1:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple fanboys.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Applegadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 12:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can this take media stored on the PC?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 12:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't know if it can natively but if it works with PlayOn it supports local files.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 12:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow... will receiver/amplifiers finally start getting smaller?  The bigger-is-better mentality has lasted way beyond its useful life in the pre-IC age.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[UnixSystemsEngineer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 12:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[Small and crappy sounding products with big wattage claims have been around for decades.  IC amps may have improved on that, but only slightly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nrb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 1:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[It uses digital amplification.  I have a Sony HTiB with a receiver that size. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Galley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 7:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh, NVM, Video is only up to 720P...USELESS. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 12:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[what a complete rip off of the THIEL zoet system!!!!!  THIEL should sue these guys!<br>www.thielzoet.com<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 1:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[yes, cause they're only completely different...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noodles2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 1:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is an absolutely ridiculous claim.  While it may appear to be similar, the price difference gives away what the look does not:<br><br>Sherwood Netboxx - less than $700<br>Thiel Zoet - as per the Customer Support / Technology Services Manager - between $25,000 and $30,000.<br><br>Yeah, me being pretty average in paycheck to most other folks, I'll be checking out the Sherwood and leaving Thiel to the 1% of the population that might afford it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeff.lenertz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think you guys missed my point, which I did not do a good job conveying:<br>#1) The industrial design of the Netboxx is a bit too similiar to the dB1, not necessarily the feature set...the netboxx doesn't have IP connection to speakers nor anywhere near the complex circuitry of the dB1<br>#2) Price has absolutely nothing to do with whether a product is similar to another, there are dozens of iPhones selling for fractions less but they all are attempting to capture a piece of the excitement, I guess imitation is the best form of flattery<br><br>I think the Sherwood guys wanted to make an innovative industrial design but I just feel that they must have been influenced by the zoet dB1, my two cents.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 11:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[denon avr 590..$300<br>samsung p1600 w/ netflix..$250<br>apple tv w/ boxee for hulu, dlna stuff...$230<br><br>about $100 more and you have a setup which in terms of quality and features...destroys this. <br><br>and you get blu ray.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pimpiinnhxc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 1:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[700watts? Yeah... I'd like to see the SNR on that bad boy, ROFL.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[barfdogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 1:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[erm it's 7.1 right? so assuming thats 7 sats and an active sub, that's 100w a channel, which is decidedly average - the latest Onkyos do 220w+ a channel... for 9 channels]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noodles2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 1:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[@noodles<br><br>Yes, the latest onkyos are 220w+ and are about 4 times larger, not to mention they don't have all the other features that this system has. My point is, that 700w coming out of something that small cant be particularly high quality.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[barfdogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 1:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[weighs in at 23lb, which is kinda positive.... the THD of 0.2%... not so much!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noodles2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 2:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[700 W in that little box?  They're bending the laws of physics as well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 7:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought it said THD was 0.02%  =/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mjayhunt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 12:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can this take media stored on the PC? I want to know this features too...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TechnGear]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 1:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have the one of the first generation digital amps from JVC. They are the real deal. Mine doesn't have HDMI so I gotta say this thing looks appealing. Smaller, thinner, lighter, and less thirsty is the future for amps.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adam.fred]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 2:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[Regardless of performance it does look pretty cool and is a step in the right direction.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RandyRogers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 4:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sherwoods-700w-r-904n-netboxx-av-receiver-dabbles-in-online-med/</guid><description><![CDATA[What will I hide the rat's nest of wires behind?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[breissim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 8:22AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
