<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Sony goes in a cheaper direction with wireless XBR10 BRAVIA LCDs</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Sony goes in a cheaper direction with wireless XBR10 BRAVIA LCDs</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony goes in a cheaper direction with wireless XBR10 BRAVIA LCDs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</guid><description><![CDATA[When this Company will learn that price is king. I bet Samsung is laughing their $@$ at Sony for keeping the same old strategy of high prices. This is  good news for Samsung, Vizio and LG.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carlos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 6:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony goes in a cheaper direction with wireless XBR10 BRAVIA LCDs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does Samsung even have a wireless HDTV?  I know they had a plasma a couple of years ago but did not think they had one now.  I have also never seen a Vizio with this option.  The only LG that I can find with a wireless connection is a much lower quality television.<br><br>You do realize that this is currently Sony's top of the line television?  That they do offer many more Wal-mart priced units?<br><br>I honestly do not get why people are unwilling to pay for a nice product.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 10th 2009 1:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony goes in a cheaper direction with wireless XBR10 BRAVIA LCDs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jimmy<br><br>I'd hardly call this Sony's top of the line television.  This is of much lower quality than Sony's best seeing as this lacks local dimming and triluminous led's.  This is probably one of the most expensive (but not the most expensive), and definitely not the highest quality.  Again, far from Sony's top of the line.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve-O]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 10th 2009 3:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony goes in a cheaper direction with wireless XBR10 BRAVIA LCDs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with the price comment.  Most American's do buy value over quality.  Thank goodness there is still enough quality left for the audio/videophiles that are the minority.  I'll buy one great TV over four bad TV's everytime!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TRT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2009 7:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony goes in a cheaper direction with wireless XBR10 BRAVIA LCDs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sony needs to bring some more 55" displays to market.  Having a 46 and 55-inch is a nice pair to offer, but 46 and 52 are a bit close.  Panasonic and Samsung are cleaning up on their 58/63/65-inch models because there is not a lot in the LCD field to compete...and what is coming is $5k (Sony) and $6k (Samsung) vs. WELL under $4k (more like $3k) for the plasmas.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 10th 2009 1:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony goes in a cheaper direction with wireless XBR10 BRAVIA LCDs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wait a minute, something is not right here.<br><br>XBR10?<br><br>It appears to be exactly the same as the ZX5.<br><br>What's the difference?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 10th 2009 3:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony goes in a cheaper direction with wireless XBR10 BRAVIA LCDs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/sony-goes-in-a-cheaper-direction-with-wireless-xbr10-bravia-lcds/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wireless connections will only add more lag on top of the video processing delays (theres a reason tv's have a gaming mode, to bypass the video processing)!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 10th 2009 8:02AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
