<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope that Apple has made a decision that will be good for everyone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DanielT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, I for one hope they've made a horrible decision that will screw everyone.<br><br>Ball's in your field.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stu L Tissimus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's apple, I can't think of many times at all where their decisions are to benefit others.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Templarian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[The decision that "Apple" made was actually made by numerous tech companies in conjunction with Apple. You can BET that Motorola, Palm, Rim, etc were all part of this and eagerly await the final set-in-stone ruling.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Freakin Ijit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br><br>So to summarize this article, Apple has decided:<br>1) iPhone updates will be free<br>2) iPod Touch updates will not be free.<br><br>So nothing really has changed lol. What's new?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tinu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 10:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, apple made a decision that'll boost their revenue and profit numbers?  What a shock.  It's almost like being surprised that they charge for iPod OS upgrades and extra money for artist bios and pictures.  Har har.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[the4thheat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 11:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[So in a free economy a company is not alowed to make decisions that will boost "profits" and create more wealth for it's investors?  Hmm some of you sound like a bunch of communists, you feel Apple owes you for it's success when you haven't done anything but criticize it.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[murmermer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 15th 2009 12:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[by everyone, you mean investors?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[reddyroc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[was supposed to be for DanielT.... whatever!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[reddyroc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pretty much. The summary is a little misleading. The concept of not reporting all the income from a sale immediately is a very common practice, and it's called unearned income. The idea is that part of the value in a sold product is post-sale support... and that value is unearned at the time of the sale. Thus, companies defer part of the income for a sale for a year or two, slowly trickling it onto the balance sheet. The company still has the cash in the bank from the sale, but they don't tell the investors about all the profit until all the post-sales support is finished. This is all well documented and well understood, and frankly it makes a lot of sense when you think about it. It's about maintaining a level of financial transparency so new investors don't get burned or swindled.<br><br>Apple's fame is that they do NOT do this with the iPod Touch, hence the upgrade fees.<br><br>The reason for reporting all your income upfront is to give your stock a short-term boost. Professional and institutional investors won't get caught by this since they understand the nuances of accounting, but a lot of individual investors will see a spike in profitability and buy in, even though that's only a phantom increase. Watch for a lot of stock sales from the executive team at Apple after the next earnings report.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jepzilla]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 9:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[wait!  It sounds like some people are saying that apple NEEDS to charge for updates for the ipod due to accounting methodology whereas they do their accounting differently for the iphone in order to offer free updates.  Is this what is being said?  On the off chance it is, i doubt it but just in case, that is absolute horsesh*t.  They charge for what they can get away with charging for and don't charge for things that would result in too big of a black lash.  Very simple really.<br>-K]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KevinC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 15th 2009 1:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[We (iTouch owners) do not have to pay ANYTHING. Just dont get the update. Simple as that Apple will have less sales in the application store of new apps that require the upgrade. Too bad...give it to me for free and i will maybe buy more apps...dont give it to me for free...no sales in app store. Steve sooner or later will do the math and make it free for iTouch owners as well. (Oh and iTouch... well see it as an abbreviation for IPod Touch.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Prijs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[The protesting through abstinence thing never works, sooner or later you'll buy the upgrade, because you know what , you were "smart" enough to buy the iPhone :) weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorKaos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 9:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[The real problem is that the iTouch is such a small portion of their sales compared to the iPhone that they just don't care.  I also think that they "believe" they are offering the iTouch at a discount so they feel "required" to charge thsoe customers for the update.  In Apple's minds they are getting so much more money from the phone subsidies that AT$T gives them that updates can afford to be given away.  Anyhow, most phones OS vendors already give updates for free so Apple would catch shit if they didn't.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dTondro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 11:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yea, firsts are good.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[And you're not being counted! YAY!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loocas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why is it that no other company has this problem?<br><br>Zune gets feature updates for free as do pretty much every other mobile device out there. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bernie16wb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wording of the contract. Apple implies there will be future upgrades but Microsoft promises you nothing... then again does M$ follow subscription accounting on the Zune?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SuperFly03]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Check out this article on the history and reality of the Zune HD hardware<br><br><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/09/14/from_oled_to_tegra_five_myths_of_the_zune_hd.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/09/14/from_oled_to_tegra_five_myths_of_the_zune_hd.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Galt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 9:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[i never understood how this was any different from say, a service pack for an os. or an update to almost any other software. who says they can't give out features? they HAVE to charge for them? i think that's bs. just say you buy the product and software updates are free. i don't get why they can't do that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RadicalxEdward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 10:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Didn't you know that the SEC has a crack squad of highly trained lawyers just waiting to pounce the next time Microsoft releases a service pack?  /s<br><br>Anyone who defends Apple's position as anything other than trying to make an extra buck (which isn't totally evil for a corporation) has got to have a mental problem.  Show me the law that says a company can't offer free services.  You better tell them about all these internet companies like google and stuff.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darthweder]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 15th 2009 12:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[seriously...i dont get it. i've taken quite a few different accouting classes. And know the difference between some of the accounting standards used by corporations, and how it can help them front load, or back load losses or profits. But i've never heard of any damn system that says that you have to charge users for updates on CE devices. I've NEVER seen another company do this. Quite frankly its absurd. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SimbaDogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 15th 2009 9:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[> Good deal all around -- except for iPod touch owners, who will still have to pay $9.95 and not get a camera.<br><br>Not true to the first part. iPod touch Software Update is now $4.95 (<a href="http://www.apple.com/ipodtouch/software-update.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/ipodtouch/software-update.html</a>).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NutMac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[$5 they'll never get from me for my iPod touch 1st gen.  Never before have I been charged multiple times for service packs to a device I outright bought.  every other company in the world finds a way to not fuck their customers like this, apple hides behind their laywers.  f  u apple.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[McPOW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[McPOW:  "Never before have I been charged multiple times for service packs to a device I outright bought."<br><br>I don't recall ever *expecting* my walkman to suddenly get new features, unless I bought a new walkman for > $50.  I think it's pretty cool that we even have the ability to get software upgrades, at $5 to boot.<br><br>Such a sense of entitlement nowadays... does the hard work and effort by the engineers at Apple mean nothing?  Did you really expect to get the new 3.0 firmware for free, having bought a 2G iPod Touch RIGHT AFTER they charged $10 for 2.0?<br><br>Get over it, crybaby.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bondsbw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 8:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ bondsbw<br><br>Actually, he's right.  Most companies issue upgrades to firmware for free.  Just look at Sandisk.  They are second to Apple in the mp3 player market (yes, it's a distant second) and they actively update firmware for all their players adding new features, new codec support, and more, responding directly to the demands of the Sansa community.  And they do so absolutely free of charge.  How can a company with no where near the financial resources of Apple provide free firmware updates, giving people the features and compatibility they ask for, while Apple refuses to?<br><br>(Oh, and great example with the walkman!  Let's compare firmware updates with something that didn't even have software!)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Quixotic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 11:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Er,<br><br>Keep up Engadget - the upgrade cost is 4.95 for iPod Touch owners.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RattyUK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple sucks, I will never download from itunes again. <br><br>What a worthless service. One time downloads.<br><br>Over hyped, over marketed bullshit!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[atx1980]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[The iPod upgrade is now $4.99 instead of $9.99.  And perhaps I'm dense (likely), but who exactly is this post aimed at?  Investors and Apple employees?  None of that makes a difference to me, that I can tell, so I'm curious.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why, because they want to deliver free updates without jumping through hoops in their accounting system?<br>Or maybe everybody's still a little sore after losing last week's Engadget podcast :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RioRyan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Excuse me!!  *Major* correction to make there -- iPhone OS 3.1 for the iPod touch is $4.95 and can be upgraded from 1.x or 2.x.  Upgrade from 3.0 is free, but supposedly only 1% of all touch owners took that plunge $9.95 so that's why for the lower upgrade price now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA["Apple's pretty famous for using subscription accounting for the iPhone and Apple TV as a way to bend the rules "<br><br>Very misleading post.  Apple isn't "bending" the rules.  They are following GAAP when filing their revenue over a two year period.  They're not the only company affected.  Nor are they the only company pushing for changes to the rules.<br><br>Might want to read the original article.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FitFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Zune HD is much cheaper. They charge $0.00 for updates. The true cost for a Touch can get kinda high comparfed to a Zune HD.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Emiliano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Source?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marbles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[We still dont know how much the zune HD games will be. Or if any will be free]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kyle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 8:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA["and we'll still get free iPhone updates. Good deal all around "<br><br>Erm, except for 3.1... that update has f*cked my 3G, unless playing dead is a new feature...<br><br>It seems I am not alone with this neat new trick either...<br><br><a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2151766&tstart=0" rel="nofollow">http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2151766&tstart=0</a><br><a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=783122" rel="nofollow">http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=783122</a><br><br>Thanks for recognising this f*ck up Apple and moving so quickly to remedy the sit..... oh wait you have done nothing. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OOh, look a fish!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA["and we'll still get free iPhone updates. Good deal all around "<br><br>Erm, except for 3.1... that update has f*cked my 3G, unless playing<br>dead is a new feature...<br><br>It seems I am not alone with this neat new trick either...<br><br><a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2151766&tstart=0" rel="nofollow">http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2151766&tstart=0</a><br><a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=783122" rel="nofollow">http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=783122</a><br><br>Thanks for recognising this f*ck up Apple and moving so quickly to<br>remedy the sit..... oh wait you have done nothing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OOh, look a fish!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thankfully, many more people had no problem with the update than those that did. My update was flawless.  I would be very pissed if the update had killed my phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aprilfool]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 8:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think its only screwing 3G and not 3GS users... right now I am carrying a phone that, from time to time, does a fantastic impression of a brick. Thanks god I dont rely on it for business.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OOh, look a fish!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 8:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[One thing I haven't seen raised: iPhones that are no longer under a subscription still get free updates. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shiny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 8:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because its a billing construct used to "charge" after sale support  (in this case post sale feature/upgrade development) when you sell the phone..<br><br>its all accounting smoke and mirrors..<br><br>Somewhere in MS financials there are likely to be charges for zunesoftware/zune firmware development that are billed to the overall arm of MS that is responsible for the Zune..<br><br>AT apple.. they are charging say 500$ retail for a product, and reserving a portion of that revenue.. and instead of charging the iphone division for the entire team that works on upgrades to the iphone OS seperately .. they reserve say 100$ from each sold device (revenue) and use that to fund ongoing development of the platform (very very basic version of how subscription accounting works vs regular accounting)<br><br>In short they are funding development of the 3 year old devices.. off the sales of new devices.. and likely they are also using an internal EOL mandate that states at what point its acceptable for new features to not be backward compatible.. (some point after the initial subscription accounting is over for those devices..)<br><br>Also keep in mind that the funds for Iphone 1.0 continue to roll in until the last device is sold NOT 2 years after the first one is sold.. So if apple sells iphone 1.0 for 3.5 years.. that is a 5.5 year window of "updates/upgrades" for that specific model under teh subscription accounting they are using..<br><br>AGAIN this is all accoutning smoke and mirrors]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jabbathewocket]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 8:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[The matter in question is subscription accounting, which is accounting for the revenue over the lifetime of the product rather than just at the time of sale. This has no relation to whether the customer has a subscription to anything.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[radarskiy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 11:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[I never understood why Apple has to do this funny accounting stuff. Blackberry never charges for new maintenance releases, or whole OS upgrades (4.2 - 4.5 - 5.0). Zune doesn't charge for OS patches and upgrades. I know that Apple wants to make a quick buck on the iPod Touch users (although basically no one bought that upgrade according to Apple). Shouldn't they just be giving this away because it unlocks better apps from the store? I was thinking of spending money on the MLB app or something, but when I found out I had to upgrade to 3.0, the cost was too high and not worth it.<br><br>In general, I don't advocate giving away software, especially software that your engineers have spent many hours on. However, when this software enables your customers to spend more money on your product, you have to consider giving it away. For instance: see Microsoft upgrading the Xbox for Netflix and movie downloads.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[J]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 8:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Again this is not a matter of giving away.. its a matter of recording income..and i believe the "rules" of accounting in this case have more to do with "best practices as defined by the SEC to keep things conforming to what they want" rather than any choice.. IE I do not think that apple has any choice in how they record the income on phones.. there choice has to do with the charging $$ for ipod touch updates for free rather than charging for them]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jabbathewocket]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 8:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I missing something, why do the spread out over 2 years at all? A free update is a free update, end of story.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Schmuck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 8:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ha, ha!  Suck it, iPod Touch chumps!  <br><br>Oh, wait… I'm an iPod chump - twice over…<br><br>I made myself cry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[billav]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 9:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA["last quarter's official revenue was $8.34 billion, while the unofficial number was $9.74 billion"<br><br>And next quarters official revenue will be $1.40 billion, while the unofficial number was $0.<br>Who cares except the accountants?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 9:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[updates are fairly common for smartphones, I'm curious how other companies do it. Also how does apple account for the OSX updates? They are free, as far I can tell.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xtasi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 9:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA["...except for iPod touch owners, who will still have to pay $9.95 and not get a camera." I laughed so hard when I read the last part; love your sense of humor!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Fuenmayor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 9:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple pushes to change subscription accounting rules ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/apple-pushes-to-change-subscription-accounting-rules/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's all gravy under the turkey.  Investors will adjust and the market will correct itself.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tommy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 9:40PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
