<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA["The big news there is that the chipset packs two ARM cores on a single chip, including one dedicated 600MHz applications processor, and a separate 400MHz modem processor to offload some of the heavy lifting"<br><br>That's pretty normal for smartphones. Latest ARM CPU for the smartphone OS, older ARM CPU for the modem.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xbit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, even the Nintendo DS does that (ARM7 for GBA mode and as a coprocessor in DS mode, ARM9 for DS stuff).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iofthestorm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[And still, a "low" end WebOS Palm phone has a much faster processor than the latest "HIGH" end Android phones from HTC/Motorola/Samsung/LG.<br><br>Way to treat Android well, phone makers!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maddy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah but considering the OpenGL ES 2 support, the OS ARM is probably a Cortex CPU where as the competing $99 iPhone 3G uses a ARM11. keyboard, multi-tasking, slimmer, etc. certainly makes the Pixi an attractive package if the rumored $100 price is true]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTitor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 8:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Offload heavy lifting?  What heavy lifting?  This platform doesn't even have meaningful<br>apps to begin with.  WTF?<br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 9:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, this is nothing special at all. Once again I say to the technically-illiterate Engadget writers -- "ARM" IS AN INSTRUCTION SET, NOT A PROCESSOR. YOU NEED TO LIST THE SPECIFIC MODEL! This is simply a 600Mhz ARM11 core just like every smartphone for the last few years. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 15th 2009 4:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[It will be a joy to own.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DanielT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree, love the completely simple look.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Engadget comment system is one more thing that's ridiculous. I am positive that I clicked the reply button for xbit's comment, not DanielTs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maddy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maddy, it's not always about the gigabitches..Some OS need less than others.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KEROLiUKAS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 8:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[With no WiFi?  Whatever you say.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gerrrg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 11:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[RAM?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[richardgm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bring on the video recording!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dcoaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[You want video recording?  Get an iPhone!<br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 8:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[dont be stupid, the iphone is a console<br>the ipod nano is the video recorder]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 15th 2009 12:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am pretty shure that i was able to record video on my nokia 5410, back in 2004 or so.<br>It wasnt HD, but it got the job done, and you could actually watch it later on a big screen and see details.<br>all my phones ever since could do video.<br>Is video recording now that the iphone can do it something special?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[qwert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 15th 2009 3:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[This thing actually looks nice.  <br><br>Durrr...Palm Pre Killer.  ;D<br><br>Also, can I ask what is the point of the "Remember Me" checkbox?  I make it remember me, but I still have to enter my credentials every time.  ???]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JakeMG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Welcome to the engadget comment system. It doesn't work.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[E C S Sucks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Are you clearing your cookies/form history?  The cookies and history need to stay if you want to use that feature.  I see no way how the comment system could actually be at fault for your problem...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sacapuntas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ sac: no.<br><br>I have the same issue sometimes. I'll comment on one article, look around at other articles and try to make a comment and I get the "You did it!" message that says they sent me an email for confirmation. I haven't reinstalled vista or firefox since I built this machine over a year ago and have been using the same e-mail and password for engadget the entire time. so, I send e-mails using the contact us options to engadget with the same usual "I haven't changed anything, fix your broken shit and get your database to recognize me" message and MAGICALLY it works the next day.<br><br>it's the comment system plain and simple. don't try to offload this fail comment systems issues on a single person.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prokanda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 10:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[i just copied their password from the mail and saved it in firefox... <br>this technique is mostly popular with the "first crowd"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 15th 2009 12:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeaa i will love to know the RAM as well...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[so in all this phone has 4 cores to cpu and 2 gpu? if so that is amazing i hope this trend catches on in the mobile industry though i worry about battery life.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jay jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[umm no it has a single cpu with 2 cores and a graphics processor (single core) which is UNUSED IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM under webos.. the comment about lol gaming on the pixi in the original post is largely .. posted for comedy]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jabbathewocket]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[not 4 cores on one chip though. 2 core cpu a seperate gpu]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yibrushn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah but is it any better than the Pre?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ScrapMaker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Big dif is no wifi on the pixi.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scrcmedic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Unlike some other "fruit" flavored phone, I seriously hope, we get to enjoy all the features this chipset has to offer. <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shravan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[You won't. Palm has not enabled OpenGL in WebOS, so there won't be any real 3D gaming, not that that would stop me from buying one. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why even bringing the iPhone into the conversation?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sonola777]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 15th 2009 11:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[3D hardware accelerated games in WebOS are not too far away. Webkit recently announced limited support for WebGL. I am sure Palm is hard at work to support WebGL as well, and that will open the floodgates for hardware accelerated 3D games on WebOS.<br><br><a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/Webkit-Now-Offers-Limited-Support-for-3D-Graphics-with-WebGL-121585.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://news.softpedia.com/news/Webkit-Now-Offers-Limited-Support-for-3D-Graphics-with-WebGL-121585.shtml</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maddy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[As mentioned, theres the WebGL thing, and shouldnt the fact it brings an OpenGL 2.0 Processor imply that palm plans on expanding this area? They could have really cut down costs by including weaker stuff. Especially since WebOS doesn't take advantage of the GPU as of yet, why should palm include it if they don't need it. It all seems to point to me like palm is planning a major revamp in WebOS graphics-ability at some point.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[napylopez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 10:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really like the look of this thing, but doesn't it lack wifi? I use wifi so much currently, that kinda kills it for me :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[all things considered]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[why shrink the screen? whyyyyyyyyy?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[willv210]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah, looks like they had some more real estate on there to work with...bummer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iroq d. mullet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's supposed to replace the Centro.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[The space that looks empty is actually the gesture area. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darthwhit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[that space below the screen is a gesture area.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[qrius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ darthwhit & qrius <br><br>ahhh, i see. makes sense...thanks!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iroq d. mullet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[the bummer is that i have a 3 year old digital camera with a screen(3.0-inch) larger than what the pixi will have(2.63-inch).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[willv210]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[I seem to be the only one that doesn't care so much about screen size =P I suppose it is because I have really good eyesight(not to sound cocky or anything lol). I actually prefer screen to smaller and have more pixel density/be sharper, then to have a large screen with low res. Like, the Pre's screen looks so much better than the iPhones to me because it is the same resolution packed into a smaller space.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[napylopez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 10:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[How about a comparison to the Pre for those of us who don't remember it all off hand?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CollateralDmg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, does that mean that it's faster than the Pre?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, it is not faster then the Pre. It's a phone for less heavy users. More consumer centric.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yibrushn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Love the formfactor, though the keyboard looks dreadful.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Y3k-Bug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[So will this phone actually use the GPU? If I'm not mistaken, the GPU on the Pre currently goes unused.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[krische]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Having a newer ARM core as a general processor and a secondary core for other task (phone, usb, touchscreen, camera, storage etc.), with additional DSP, is pretty normal and has been for many years. Not sure what the "big news" or deal here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KIFF]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[As a consumer, why would one pick this over say a blackberry or an e72?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gunner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because it has innovative features like "web browsing" and "touchscreen technology". <br><br>The better question is why would anyone buy a Nokia E72 or a Blackberry when you can get something like this with a far superior interface, better hardware and more capabilities.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 6:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/palm-pixi-processor-chipset-specs-get-detailed-at-last/</guid><description><![CDATA[Your first point is pretty much invalid. The Nokia E72, like Nokia's previous smartphones, has a WebKit-based browser with Flash support.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xbit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 14th 2009 7:03PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
