<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Chicks will so dig this! <br><br>Crank up the Audiovox car stereo deck and locate my 38 Special Greatest Hits!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xcrunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 10:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Located. Rockon!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[000000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[True.. I'll def be getting a pair of these to watch movies while at work... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lifeguard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[I want these more than I've ever wanted anything.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TimmyRaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 10:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Really? Well I guess there's something to be said for easy pleasing :-|]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[all things considered]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 12:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hopefully the two sides are individually addressable, otherwise these things can't handle 3-D.  That would be pathetic.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Information Central]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 3:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Put that device on some gucci sunglasses and I'll think about it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Al.O.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 10:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does anyone actually buy these types of devices?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EM1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 10:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Through the above comments, obviously.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darbear5610]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 10:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have the MyVu.  I like them a lot.  The wife didn't want a TV in the bedroom, so I watch these in bed.  Works out pretty sweet.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oneof52]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 8:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry, guess my interweb translator did not pick up everyone's sarcasm.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EM1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[People with IPods, I guess.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blacknimbus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Imagine combining these with the gamegun by the redneck here: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/29/gamegun-going-to-be-ready-for-retail-by-christmas-will-be-conso/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/29/gamegun-going-to-be-ready-for-retail-by-christmas-will-be-conso/</a><br><br>I'd take that in a second]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Martintxo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[This would only be good combined with the gamegun if it allows some see-through vision, otherwise you'll be walking into walls and furniture all day.  But if you had a huge empty room it would be awesome!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MattG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2009 10:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[4 out of 5 ophthalmologists recommend against.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[koehler83]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 10:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's the same exact thing with a set of walmart sunglasses over top. Ingenious!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hreyy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 10:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[AA batteries are great.  What's your problem with them?<br><br>Particularly for items used in travel, you don't want some stupid proprietary battery.  A lot of people won't buy a camera if it doesn't take AAs.  You can get them anywhere, and you can get great rechargeables.  They are much cheaper to replace because there's tons of competition.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gimboa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Fapping with your glasses on. Should make for some great gotcha videos from roomates. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lakersin2025]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[From Vuzix -<br><br>The virtual 55 inch* Wrap 310 screen offers unmatched performance. It displays both standard 4:3 and 16:9 screen formats and plays 2D and 3D movies and videos. Its support for all common formats of 3D video offers maximum media compatibility. Its Vuzix Auto 3D enables automatic 3D configuration when supporting media is played. <br><br>*Equivalent screen size as seen from 10 feet (approximately 3m).<br><br>--<br><br>That's still not good enough for me!  Why would you want to watch poor resolution 55" from 10 feet?  That's no better than the previous designs except they look better.  I absolutely love the idea of this, but if only the game/movie was properly in your face I won't be getting one.  Saying that, there is no way to try one (that I can see...) without buying it, unless anyone knows where you can (in the UK).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Choco_Bear]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[That looks like something Kanye West would wear to an awards show.... <br><br>...to watch Beyonce videos during dull country performances on stage.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DutchGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[FAIL!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjaydogg3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Stephen you KNOBJOCKEY!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Choco_Bear]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[douche to the bag]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's Kanye, not Kayne. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FloeJoe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who gives a shit? If you're walking around outside watching video on a simulated 55" screen:<br><br>a.) you're not looking at anything else (especially the sun)<br>b.) you deserve to be hit by that car you're walking in front of]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NoAndThen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[The problem with these type of glasses is that they screen moves with your head.  It's extremely difficult to watch a video when every little twitch of your head (and there are way more twitches than you think) shakes your whole fricking 55 inch tv like a 7.0 earthquake.  I would love it if someone made it track your head movement, but i suppose that would require an extreme amount of video processing to move the image around without delay or blur.  Just my two cents... Anyone know the technical challenges of making a tracking one? Could it ever be fast enough to keep up with head twitches? or would there always be some delay or blurring?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2009 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[One question. Can you see anything but the screen if you wear them?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Igor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[IIRC, you can remove the screens. But IDK if you can view your surroundings while watching something.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjaydogg3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah, well that'd be a big thing, I don't like completely isolating myself from my surroundings, especially for something that at least looks like its meant to be used outdoors. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Igor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[IIRC, you can remove the screens.  But IDK if you can view your surroundings while watching something.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjaydogg3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry, this was in reply to Igor]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjaydogg3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is perfect for those long transcontinental flights.  iPhone/iPods are simply the best devices to own.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jubei]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Geordi La Forge is unhappy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BigD145]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Resolution or GTFO. The Vuzix Wrap 310 has a resolution of 428 x 240p. That's pathetic. These glasses still have a LONG way to go before they can be considered worthwhile. They literally need to TRIPLE their resolution before we can consider using them with a computer. I understand these are made for iPod videos, but who wants to watch their favorite TV shows in youtube-quality? "Twin high-resolution" isn't just misleading, it's an outright fabrication. These glasses are worth $75 and not a penny more. Vuzix current AV310 (precursor to the Wrap 310) sells for $250.<br><br>The Vuzix iWear AV920 has a resolution of 640x480, which is a large step in the right direction, however 800x600 has been available in very slightly larger packages since 2003. On another note, I applaud Vuzix for their development of augmented reality accessories for the Wraps! Let's just get 720p in those glasses and people will be lining up to hand $500 for watching video off their XBOX 360's, PS3's, ION powered laptops, Tegra powered cell phones, Zune HD's (docked?), and most effectively their 3D content on PS3s' and desktops.<br><br>3D 720p, Vuzix. Bring this to us and you will be golden.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 11:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agrizzle my nizzle. Fo' shizzle, dizzle?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Choco_Bear]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 12:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was thinking the same thing reading the post and release. QVGA isn't exactly "high-resolution" anymore. And a 55" TV that's only QVGA? I don't think so. Any modern 55" TV supports 1080p.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 1:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[They need to etch "Estrada" across the front!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[+1 "ESTRADAAA" lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[all things considered]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[any wireless version and how much?<br>also with the transparent display happening on cellphones, will this double as sunglasses with that kind transparent display some day?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 12:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is awesome. Now I can watch porn on my wife's forehead while we're having sex.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Arimanio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 12:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[+1 LMAO!! You made my day xD!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOL fashion is for girls and metros. Presentable is all that matters. And that thing is presentable. Anyone who spends hundreds for a pair of sunglasses that only block out the sun have way to much cash to burn.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 1:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't understand alot these comments.  Aren't the glasses really just to help you not look insane while you watch a movie on a plane or on a bus or in a waiting room.  Do people really think these are for running errands and watching Transformers 2 at the same time?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveHimself]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[People who really truly think someone looks insane for wearing the old style has some mental issues. And YES millions of people can be wrong. Especially if they jerk eachother off with the same fashion nonsense. Bunch of sheep. BAAAHHH BAHHHHH]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 1:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[These look great, but how can you hear the video??? the 30 pin is being used so, does that mean you need bt headsets? Looking around i found these <a href="http://www.budsgoblue.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.budsgoblue.com/</a>, they look cool but no info on who makes them]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2009 11:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, I love the fact that they use the words "high resolution" all over the place in an attempt to hide the fact that its a 640x480 (circa 1999) display.  Wouldn't you just love a 55" 640x480 screen?<br><br>Also the previous versions were just horrid wrt battery life.  I wonder if this version will be any better?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fanfoot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 2:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bluetooth?  Bluetooth is slow for even mundane purposes; transmitting VIDEO over it is ridiculous.<br><br>And wireless?  That's not gonna fly on the plane, literally.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Information Central]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 2:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do these things still require regular doses of Tylenol to be tolerable?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Topmounter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 3:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it also streams video from the iphone camera then I'm sold.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hmmwv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 3:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/</guid><description><![CDATA[Price?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 16th 2009 6:03PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
