<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd imagine the battery would die fast if it was at 3.06ghz for a long time]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Haikibutsu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 4:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[I didn't think Turbo Boost was available on battery.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jakem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 4:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you gotta have 3Ghz then it will scale to that.  I was reading an article the other day about how Win 7 was designed for shutting down of cores and scaling of this nature.  So my guess is its not going to be as bad as one would think.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 9:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[they said. 56whr battery lasted 3.5 hrs idle]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[avianasian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 4:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[ I would love to get that! Hopefully it won't burn a hole in my wallet.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GunMetalBlue]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 4:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[it'll cost you 4 robotic arms and 8 robtic legs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[va jj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 4:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not only that but it'll burn a hole in your lap too]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sam arieta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 4:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great, now just make it so the entire machine, including GPU, display and hard drives, consumes under 10W at idle/office settings, and I'll be first in line with a pile of money that would buy a decent car...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bemymonkey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 4:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pardon my ignorance but I thought Turbo Boost was for when you *weren't* multi-tasking and you simply increased the speed of a single core to concentrate on a single process...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelmon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 5:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hurrah! A(nother) laptop that has i7! not like that fake Jian i7 >_>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[YohanNg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 5:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[1.73 GHz. LOL.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 7:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[How is that a fail? Unless you think more ghz=more power and that is the only influencing factor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 7:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[What? 2.0GHz i7 = more powerful than 1.73GHz i7.......]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 7:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its 1.73ghz when using all 4 cores. If you reduce it to 2 cores it runs at 2.8ghz or 3.02ghz at a single core. Read the article. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[matthew.harbeson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 8:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Matt.  You miss one point.  That would require Kurian to know how to read.  Obviously from his comment he doesn't.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 9:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[And why would you get a 2.8/3.0 GHZ in a single core when you can get the cheaper Dual Core 2 Duo that runs in 2 cores 2.800?<br><br>these core i7 is not cheap according to intel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR House]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 9:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[So that when you aren't needing the full power it can shut down to 1.7(or even 1.2 in battery saver mode) and in theory give you better battery life......]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric B]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 9:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can almost taste new MBP's and iMac's with these bad boys in them. My handbrake/visual hub encodes will just fly with these puppy's.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernando]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 8:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[iMac - yes.  MBP - not just yet.  Apple's gonna wait for the 32nm process to go into effect, especially if it IS going to be in early 2010, just in time for a refresh of their laptop line.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rells009]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 9:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Absolutely.  Macs are well positioned to take advantage of quad (or more)core.  Apple was getting some Intel procs before anyone else so hopefully that will be the case here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 10:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[iTard strikes again.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 10:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[LULZ  I thought Macbooks were blazing fast? Why would it need a Core i7?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Al.O.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 11:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[They are fast but faster is always better right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernando]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, they are the fastest, but fastester is always better.<br><br>Sincerely,<br><br>Apple Defense League]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10minutehobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope it has a turbo button like my 1994 Packard Bell?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lou]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 9:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[I want i7 Mobile so bad that I'm about ready to go down to Round Rock and camp out in front of Dell's HQ.  Hey I've camped out for far less important things. :P<br><br>In all seriousness.  We've seen designs come and go over the years, and it can always be said that if you are waiting for the next big thing in design you will be waiting forever because there will always be something new and innovative over the horizon.  However the i7 mobile is bringing about a drastic change in how processors work, at least for mobile Intel chips.  The ability to shut down entire cores and scale a single or two to a higher freq is something we just have not had until now.  Also Vista design made such scaling....not impossible but Intel was banging their heads into a brick wall due to Vista's attempt to keep everything active (The thinking being lets not waste clock cycles or cores.)  With Win 7 MS worked with Intel on the design and I'm certain the coupling of Win7 and i7 is going to be a beautiful thing....I'll stop gushing now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 9:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Win 7 will be marginally better with multiple cores than Vista which isn't saying much at all.  The Win 7 scheduler is still the same piece of shit it has always been.  Which means allowing additional threads is of little value other than increasing instability and general weird behavior. Maybe one of these days Microsoft will have the skill or cojones to rid themselves of their archaic OS underpinnings but I doubt it.  the first thing to go should be the friggin registry.  What an anachronism that is.  Until the registry is gone you will continue to enjoy windows rot as the OS slows down and becomes less stable over time until you do a complete reinstall.  Enjoy!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 10:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Terry you obviously are regeritating the same FUD being displayed by ignorant iTards.  MS redid the scheduler in Win7 to take further advantage of hyperthreading.<br><br>please do the world a favor and DIE.  No I do mean it.  People that spread FUD would be better off not existing.  Thanks.  Have a great day Mr. iTard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 10:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[The fact that you use the made up word iTard just makes you that much more of douche bag. So please do us all a favor, and slice off you nuts so that we as a society do not have to deal with any procreation you may have in the future.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernando]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 11:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[PS  When you open up task manager and see 8 cores (due to HT.)  I'm certain many are going to have a **** eating grin on their face. :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 9:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too bad it will be on Windows which takes poor advantage of multiple cores.  Or large amounts of memory.  Linux or OS X is a different story.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 10:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Take your FUD somewhere else.  Win7 uses all the cores and is why it has been documented to boot in 11 seconds on an i7 system.  Looser.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 10:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Documentation: <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2352311,00.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2352311,00.asp</a><br><br>Let me guess?  iTard?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 10:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oops more. <a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Going+Deep/Dave-Probert-Inside-Windows-7-User-Mode-Scheduler-UMS/" rel="nofollow">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Going+Deep/Dave-Probert-Inside-Windows-7-User-Mode-Scheduler-UMS/</a><br><br>Ahhh!  Can you be any more wrong?  I think so!  Lets find out!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 10:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[More <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd627187%28VS.85%29.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd627187%28VS.85%29.aspx</a><br><br>But yah I see the error of my ways.  MS has done nothing with support for multiple processors in Win 7.  Not at all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 10:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Terry = Pwned hard]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Al.O.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 11:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[for many, the purpose of i7 is to play games, mobile GPU either overheats too much and/or just not capable of play latest games, (mac users have to install windows to play most of those any way), I think they need to find a better mobile GPU solution or make GPU external... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 10:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[If the purpose of the i7 is to play games then they aren't paying attention.  Very few games uses quad core and regular old Core 2 duo's play almost all games faster than the i5 or i7.  I play plenty of games without installing Windows.  Crossover works quite well for me.  The Mac native call of Duty 4 works quite well for me.  There aren't many games out there worth playing anyway.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 10:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Very few games uses quad core and regular old Core 2 duo's play almost all games faster than the i5 or i7.<br>regular old Core 2 duo's play almost all games faster than the i5 or i7<br>Core 2 duo's play almost all games faster than the i5 or i7<br>the i5 or i7 play almost all games faster than the regular old Core 2 duo's <br><br>*fixed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[POW!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 11:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Terry do you even read benchmarks? -.-<br>And the fact that you're gaming on a mac doesn't help either : /]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[POW!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 1.73GHz  Core i7-820 QM mobile CPU maneuvers onto test bench]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[and maybe the fact that aren't many games worth playing out there for you is because you're using a mac -.-<br><br>There are plenty of games released that are QUIET worth playing imo ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[POW!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 21st 2009 11:30AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
