<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for AT&amp;T, Verizon poised to fight FCC's net neutrality stance on the wireless front</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for AT&amp;T, Verizon poised to fight FCC's net neutrality stance on the wireless front</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T, Verizon poised to fight FCC's net neutrality stance on the wireless front]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</guid><description><![CDATA[The options you outline are all on the mark. But the problem with the last suggestion, wherein you propose letting the market decide, is that the FCC is proposing the exact opposite of that. I'm certainly not willing to argue that the free market is in action for the big two right now, but it's very much in the FCC's proposal to prevent it from ever being so. When the government starts wielding a big enough hammer, it starts seeing everything as a nail.<br>There's no excuse for throttling down terrestrial internet access. But there's no way you can force wireless internet wide open and not make everyone suffer for it.<br><br>At least until, as was stated, LTE spreads its wings.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2009 3:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T, Verizon poised to fight FCC's net neutrality stance on the wireless front]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</guid><description><![CDATA[They already manage access. It's called 5GB limits for flat rates and per MB rates after that. Even some terrestrial ISPs do that. Mine, in fact does, and I utilize the resource appropriately.<br><br>Restricting access is completely different and the wireless providers should be held to the same accountability as everyone else. If I got over the limits accessing the site I want, that's on me, but no provider should provide a sub-par experience because I'm not hitting a preferred site.<br><br>Besides, if AT&T was really worried about bandwidth limits, they'd stop selling iPhones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skemme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2009 3:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T, Verizon poised to fight FCC's net neutrality stance on the wireless front]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a few comments:<br><br>Since ISP's/carriers mostly have caps on data, historical data on usage as well as speed cap, can they not do capacity planning to ensure they have the capacity for the number of users they sign up!!!<br><br>I am in Canada, I hope our government take similar stand with carriers]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2009 3:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T, Verizon poised to fight FCC's net neutrality stance on the wireless front]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</guid><description><![CDATA[This will be a perfect example of be careful what you wish for.  If made to by the Govt, we will all pay dearly for unfettered wireless access.  Unlimmited data plans will be gone.  We will all be charged a premium.  Bandwith on wireless is finite and i for one have no issue's with the wireless ISP's managing thier networks as they see fit.  If I dont like the policy's of one of the big four, its my choice to leave and take my business elsewear.  Getting sick and tired of this nany Govt telling business how and what to do.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rusty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2009 3:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T, Verizon poised to fight FCC's net neutrality stance on the wireless front]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</guid><description><![CDATA["If I dont like the policy's of one of the big four, its my choice to leave and take my business elsewear."<br><br>That's all well and good, assuming the big four's policies actually differ from one another.  Where do you turn when all 4 of them decide to restrict or cripple a certain type of data?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JKluzi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2009 4:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T, Verizon poised to fight FCC's net neutrality stance on the wireless front]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</guid><description><![CDATA[As of today that is hardly an issue.  Sprint is dropping prices and giving customers as much data as they want.  As customers take them up on it and start switching the other carriers will have to follow or lose business.  Thats the beauty of the free market.  Let it be.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rusty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2009 4:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T, Verizon poised to fight FCC's net neutrality stance on the wireless front]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</guid><description><![CDATA[You should realize what will happen if internet T.V catches on and how it will hamper their efforts to succed in the market if they continue to throttle.  I'm with you about the free market issue but when ISP are now interfering with other businesses with throttling and selective allowances of usage you are now interfering with fair competition between other sectors.  A bussiness should not have to suffer because their customers are on AT&T.  ISP effect the country as a whole bussiness or consumer alike.  I would definitely agree with you other sectors but ISP affect way to much when they interfer with fair competition, while they should be able to do business as they want, but there are just some practices that shouldn't be allowed and especially if they effect future technology like Internet T.V where streaming video is going to damper the system even more by what they are saying.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryujin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2009 5:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T, Verizon poised to fight FCC's net neutrality stance on the wireless front]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</guid><description><![CDATA[If the current ecosystem is so favorable for Sprint, why are they the ones mildly supporting Genachowski's proposal while the other players - who you indicate stand to lose business - are against it?<br><br><a href="http://topics.npr.org/quote/0aMXfzebPUcpI" rel="nofollow">http://topics.npr.org/quote/0aMXfzebPUcpI</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jkluzi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2009 5:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T, Verizon poised to fight FCC's net neutrality stance on the wireless front]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</guid><description><![CDATA[AT&T is not turning off or giving back the 1900Mhz spectrum.  It is overlaying 850Mhz spectrum in certain markets. This means it is using both frequencies.  This means it is using both licenses. This means that it has paid to use that spectrum. <br><br>The newly acquired 700Mhz spectrum also cost big money. The license costs have to be recouped while building out the new network infrastruture. This all costs billions on dollars.  <br><br><br>So who is going to front AT&T and VZW the money to build these networks out?   Ideas are often good theoretically. But implementation of them involves being pratical. Mass coverage of LTE is years off for most of the country. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Man_of_God]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2009 5:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T, Verizon poised to fight FCC's net neutrality stance on the wireless front]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/atandt-verizon-poised-to-fight-fccs-net-neutrality-stance-on-the/</guid><description><![CDATA[All it takes is a couple people using their "unlimited" connections to torrent or p2p something and the whole network slows to a crawl unless they reduce these people's bandwidth.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2009 9:00PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
