<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[great! the HD4870 will drop price soon :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lEE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 4:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Buying into old tech is a bad idea. Only worth it if the technology gap is small. DX11 and PS5.0 are pretty big things and even if you are getting one for folding the the price of a 58x0 card is justifiable by the energy savings and extra raw power.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[richb93]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 7:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Unless he doesn't have the money of course to buy one of these cards. I would of loved to put two GTX 295's and a i7 in my new rig but I opted for a Phenom II 940 and a HD4890 and the only current game I can't have maxed out at 1920x1080 is Crysis and the actual gameplay of that game is crap its just too damn repetitive. I imagine the HD4870 should fair quite well as I beleive it is only 20% slower than my card?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[duggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 7:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would go 4890.<br>Or if you do the 4870 make sure you get 1gb ram. That way it will run the nex gen games well. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[windblownmonkey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 8:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't help but think buying first Gen DX11 cards is a stupid idea.<br><br>DX10 came out, only a few games used it, very little graphical quality and in games like Resident Evil 5, there's almost no image quality difference but the DX10 version runs slower than its counter part.<br><br>I find that DX11 is simply a guise to sell us new hardware with new software revisions that won't be fully utilized to convince us our last gen hardware is obsolete to make us buy more of their shit.<br><br>But good going AMD/ATI. Intel is laying the smackdown on ya but you still keep on truckin'. Anyway, half a year later nVidia will release something to counter this to claim their Performance Crown, despite being prohibitively expensive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jono]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 8:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[The PC Perspective review has a lot of cool videos of the AMD Eyefinity multi-monitor gaming:<br><br><a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=783&type=expert&pid=6" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=783&type=expert&pid=6</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 11:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cool running? Lower power consumption?? SAME POWER ENVELOPE?????<br><br>"... the 5870 ends up being the most power-hungry single-GPU card, at 401W total system power."<br><br>"Meanwhile the 5870 CF takes the cake, beating every other configuration for a load power of 664W. If we haven’t mentioned this already we will now: if you want to run multiple 5870s, you’re going to need a good power supply."<br><br>If the "same power envelope" includes dual gpu cards, heh!! maybe. Otherwise, FAIL!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 1:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Keith<br><br>Seeing as the Radeon 5870 performs on par with or slightly worse than the GTX 295....I'm pretty sure...it does...include dual GPU cards...that's...actually the point really. Did you read the actual reviews?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 2:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[@keith<br><br>that was only 1 review (anandtech) of the 8 supplied. the other 7 report similar power consumption compared to the 4870, while being almost twice as fast. <br><br>i'd believe the majority over the single. also anandtech #'s is TOTAL system consumption. it's pretty much certain that they used different hardware to compare against previous builds which are of different components, of which they did not retest. anandtech introduced too many variables that makes their numbers UNreliable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rBz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 3:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sweet.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[onewordanthem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 4:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[HO-LY CRAP. 1600 stream processors @ 850MHz? The GTX295 has 480 stream processors @ 666MHz... 1GB of VRAM vs. 1792MB of VRAM... does it really make a difference? With that many processors at a higher clock speed, can Nvidia even compete?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yokken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 12:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can't directly compare the number of stream processors between current gen Nvidia and ATI cards. For a rough comparison, multiply Nvidia's number by 5 and you'll get the ATI equivalent. Notice that 5*480=2400, which is larger than 1600, which is a big reason why the GTX295 outpaces the HD5870 in a lot of games.<br><br>That said, HOLY **** I WANT ONE! My HD4870 feels so puny...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aznofazns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[You cannot make a statement based on the old card about if you can or cannot compare nvidia's stream processors, since these aren't the same ones but just more as the 4870, these are redesigned and everything has higher precision now for instance.<br>Read on hardocp for to learn some of the tech stuff, and I'm sure anand, but I didn't check that out yet.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 10:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[wait till Nvidia get's there groove on, it'll be Hotter]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnnyD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 4:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Considering this card will probably run at 88c load, I doubt that. Trust me, I have a 4870x2.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frostblade10]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 4:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[there's something seriously wrong with your card then, My sapphire 4870x2 card with stock cooler & bios modded with an ASUS TOP bios with the Vcore at 1.35V (up from 1.25V stock) with 850mhz gpu 1000mhz mem runs at 56 degrees idle 76 on load.. And it has the same performance as the 5870..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alcom4x]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 6:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Have you read the reviews? :)<br><br>It uses a hell of a lot less power than all the other high end cards and runs in the 30's idle, 60's load :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaronage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 7:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[3 weeks waiting till delivering :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mscofield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 4:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's Meh, performs marginally better than my 4870X2. Will wait and see how the 2GB eyefinity version pans out]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Macbeth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 4:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[It might perform the same as 4870x2, but single 5870 consumes *less* power than single 4870 -> less than half of power of 4870x2.<br><br>I plan to upgrade my power supply to 500W (or more) version. 5870 would be OK, 4870x2 - not.<br><br>P.S. Official price of 5850 is $379. That is very close to the street price of two 4870: 2 * $180 = $360. But is more than $300-ish of 4870x2.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 5:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wait for the Radeon HD 5870 X2 or 5890]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 7:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dummy1001 <br><br>That alone isn't reason enough to part with $379 and swap out current card for this one. If your still thick in the head, I already own a 4870x2 this card does next to nothing for me. That should have been understood with the fist comment. <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Macbeth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 2:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's disappointing how the limited bus (256-bit) and memory (1GB) is limiting the potential of this beast. You can see the card being bottle-necked in many texture-heavy games. AMD could have easily destroyed nVidia had they chosen to go with a 512-bit bus. You know nVidia will go with a 512-bit bus for their GT300 series.<br><br>Nevertheless, the card offers good value for the money. Cannot wait to see what 5870 X2 is capable of :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Musouka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 4:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd guess they're holding back to counter Nvidia's next move, something that I don't recall ATI doing so much back in the day.  It looks like AMD has brought over a trick or two from the CPU wars.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[msalivar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 4:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't wait until the Nvidia cards come out. These cards aren't too large a step up from the DX10 cards. No doubt eraly adopter will be after them though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Murtaza]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 4:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do any of the reviews talk about fan noise? The 48XX series has always been louder than their Nvidia counterparts, and unnecessarily so. It'd be nice if Sapphire wasn't the only one making quiet ATI cards. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 4:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA["The noise levels coming from the card paint a different picture. I'm not really thrilled about it. At IDLE you'll have no problem with the card whatsoever as noise levels remain under 40 dBA.<br><br>Once the GPU starts to heat up the fan RPM will go up as well. The card however remains steady at roughly 42 dBA which really is a very normal noise level. Not annoying at all. So that's good as well."<br><br><a href="http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-5870-review-test/13" rel="nofollow">http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-5870-review-test/13</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Musouka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 4:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[This review measures noise: <a href="http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/Radeon_HD_5870/29.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/Radeon_HD_5870/29.html</a><br><br>Quite good in idle, but a bit too noisy under load.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[espen.halvorsen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 4:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Please note that most reviews do not mention brand of the cards. They look like AMD/ATI internally manufactured cards. In fact some of them show the AMD logo.<br><br>That means whatever you would get from newegg.com/etc (HIS, Sapphire and ASUS are listed) might have very different acoustic properties.<br><br>Fans are the first where most OEMs cut the costs of reference design.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 5:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't really care how loud the card is, if its 'under load' I'm probably playing a game.  If I can hear the card over my speakers then there is a problem.  What the point of having a couple hundred watt 5.1 surrond speakers if you can hear a cooling fan over them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 10:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Price? I really love the Ati cards]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[digitallysick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 4:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[$399 (if you could find one)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Musouka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 4:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[From Anand's review: 5870 - $379, 5850 - $259<br><br>5850 should start appearing next week.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 5:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just grabbed one of the last ones from newegg for $387.86 shipped!!! ...  Cant wait to replace my aging 7900gtx.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cherie22984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2010 3:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[It looks like a high-mid range offering might replace my 9800GTX+.  I'll wait to see what kind of semi-passive cooling solutions find their way onto the market (with a side venting fan on my case), but it looks like it should be fairly easy to keep cool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[msalivar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 5:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Loving the show press release thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimminy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 5:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why don't they produce shorter cards? So about 17 cm to fit on a Mini-ITX board without a problem?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 5:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[The shorter cards are not out yet. Only the high end cards are out. They said that the mid-end and low end 5xxx GPU will be out in Q1 2010.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ayle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 10:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sadly reviewers apparently had only 5870 available. I'd love to see how 5850 compares.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 5:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[So ATI doubled everything on the 58xx compared to 48xx.<br><br>Does that say goodbye to the 4xxx launch time promise of multi-chip future?<br><br>Because from the 58xx it seems that they are moving in the same direction as nVidia: simply cramming more stuff on the even larger die.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 5:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[I remember that, though it may have been more about a modular approach to the silicon itself: the down-range cards used exactly the same technology, with fewer modules on the die. Rather than nVidia's approach, which is to sell last years high end card at mainstream prices...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bebop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 24th 2009 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can anyone recommend an alternative to Newegg?<br><br>I've had good experiences with them in the past, but between charging $900+ for Intel's $440 SSD, and the games they're currently playing with the video cards (295 prices dropped to around $410 until the reviews of the 5870 came out, then the prices went up to nearly $500.) they've seen the last of my cash. <br><br><br>There's a line between price premiums and price gouging, AFAIC Newegg crossed it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 6:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Two others, mwave.com and provantage.com]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 7:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[another review, personally my favorite place for reviews.<br><br><a href="http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/23415-sapphire-radeon-hd-5870-1gb-gddr5-review.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/23415-sapphire-radeon-hd-5870-1gb-gddr5-review.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Schmuck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 6:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[OMG WANT WANT WANT!! Need to get one of these badboys. Board is CF enabled too so when the price drops even more I'll strap another in :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[richb93]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 7:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have 2xGTS 250s<br><br>is one of these better than those?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Izzak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 7:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes Yes but will it play Crysis?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoof]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 7:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[Crysis sucks!!11one]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[richb93]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 8:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have 2 4890's so ill wait until they come out with the 5890, or whatever their next DX11 card is, Nvidia or ATi they're 1st cards for the new DirectX, or new gen always seem to have some sort of problem or, draw too much power for what its worth, usually for me waiting for their next card like i did with the 4890, is a good idea, I bought 2 pre-overclocked 4890's clocked at 901mhz each. so i can live for now :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hitmanjustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 7:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/ati-radeon-hd-5870-blazes-onto-the-scene-receives-approving-nod/</guid><description><![CDATA[finally!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2009 8:13AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
