<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[God damn you, AT&T.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[smak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seriously.  <br><br>Or, you can just bounce on your contract because coverage isnt in your home. <br><br>Pathetic excuse for a company to prey on ignorant people.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Smitty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[How far can you go before you lose signal?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 2:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Chas within 3 feet or around any corner of your house.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ctgaffney]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why is anyone willing to spend more money to keep their service when they always have a choice of just switching carriers but keeping their numbers?  Are people so stupidly loyal that they'd rather pay extra money just to make the service work?<br><br>I mean, the money you pay for the service is 100% reliable.  can you say the same about your mobile phone?  since everyone alive has to say 'no' to that question, then the reality is that we are all being ripped off.  nobody should have any loyalty whatsoever to their mobile carrier.<br><br>I can't see any good use for this product anywhere except where there is NO service otherwise.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 3:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dan<br><br>it's not about loyalty to att. it's about people wanting to have an iphone, or a bold or whatever, and being stuck on att.<br><br>if phones were 100% interchangeable between carriers, then most people would probably switch carriers over annoying service, but alas...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 4:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[ATT sucks, but ... if you work in creepy steel building on 120th floor, then the signal might be weak no matter what provider you have and this MicroCell can significantly improve it. The same applies to cabin on Tahoe in the middle on the mountain. It's great device, it just should not cost $150, but $19.99<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JimboJones]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 5:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think people have failed to see the beauty of this thing: Being able to continue using your AT&T phones (at least in the hotel/apartment) when you go overseas for vacation or work...<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Harkonian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 6:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Harkonian<br><br>In the article they state that there's a GPS chip in the unit so you cannot do what you describe.<br><br>@Dan<br><br>You're about half right i'd guess. I'm sure there's some "loyalty" to provider or phone, but there are many places where signal sadly does not reach well. One friend had a radiant barrier in his roof, basically foil to help with insulation, terrible signal from any carrier within the house, or you may live in a valley, bad signals of any kind, my office has terrible wireless coverage (of any kind) because of something in its construction. Those places your carrier isn't really "at fault" and $150 is a small price to pay, the rest of the time its just a cop out, probably should cost less.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mez Jr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 7:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[When i cancel my contract to go to sprint, these are my first words that will be uttered..." Fuck you ,At&t"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Smartmouth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2009 1:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@smartmouth  <br><br>You're going to dump one of the worst carriers for...  the other worst carrier?  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MadJoe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 12:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[A product you pay monthly for to fix a networks own failure to provide you with reliable 3G. Brilliant.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[steakman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Incorrect. You pay *up front* for the box, and only pay monthly if you want unlimited calling for $20/month. Otherwise it just eats up your minutes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[isnt it. its is exactly what i thought when i saw other companies creating micro-cells. they do not want to build more infrastructure after the gross estimation on fiber-optic lines and now they want consumers to pay for their slice of the expansion so ATT doesnt have to. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nintendo fanboy hater]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is AT&T way of making their 3G network more accessible without putting up a tower themselves, soon you will hear about how they have 3G everywhere thanks to these little boxes ppl have to pay for.  Good way for AT&T to keep their cost down, make ppl pay to expand their network]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[miguel0301]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[The biggest challenges to a cell company putting up additional towers in any given area are the citizens of the given area.  Everybody complains about the coverage, but the only way to fix it is to build more towers which nobody wants to do. <br>So, they started getting creative.  It provides people with an alternative to just complaining about it and a solution in particular problem areas and homes.  <br>That being said, I still think the pricing for this is outrageous.  I wouldn't spend that much on a wireless router, let alone something that just makes and receives calls in addition to one.  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coloradogray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fatima, when you pay as much of a monthly fee as I do for my AT&T service, being able to make phone calls at home is kind of ideal.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 2:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fatima<br><br>Are you a moron? The primary function of this is to provide people with decent voice service in a location where signal is weak/non-existent.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[VDubb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 2:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[You've gotta be a serious ATT fanboi to want to pay MORE to your wireless provider BECAUSE they provide you with BAD service!<br><br>Jesus. Just switch to VZW.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[reuthermonkey1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[reuthermonkey1, steel building I work in downtown SF has weak signal no matter what services you have - it's combination of steel-concrete-height of the building. The price is a frickin joke, but the device is not bad.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JimboJones]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 5:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[3g sucks, it wastes too much power,<br><br>and if you have dsl why not just use the internet from a computer instead from your cell phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ehru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA["and if you have dsl why not just use the internet from a computer instead from your cell phone." <br>The femtocell is to allow phone calls where you have no signal. The 3g part is because phone calls are higher quality over 3g, and to enable web features on phones without wifi.<br><br>I've seen so many people say "Why don't you just use wifi", totally missing the point that this allows phone calls and text messages where you wouldn't have been able to use them before.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Wilson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sure, 3G voice is higher quality ... but it does suck up a lot more battery power than Edge.  In fact, 3G uses more battery for me than WiFi does.  I would also prefer that it had Edge support, but I don't think any femtocells have multiple bandwidths, so maybe it's an FCC complication that AT&T/Cisco just doesn't want to deal with, hence 3G only.  Still, it's not irrational to want the device to have Edge support.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Sonne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 2:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[As worn-out as I am on this whole AT&T MicroCell topic, I was just about to just close this tab when I saw your comment and thought I'd just point out that 3G usually drains your phone more quickly because there are fewer 3G cell towers than 2G cell towers.  This requires your phone to increase the amount of power it uses to send a signal back to the more distant tower, draining your battery more quickly.  So *theoretically* if the "tower" is right in your room, your phone should be able to use minimal power to transmit and thereby increase your battery life.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joquarky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I live in Raleigh, and AT&T's service map makes it appear as if you shouldn't need one of these to get great 3G service.  Do they not have great service here also?  If so, I don't see how they've avoided a massive lawsuit due to false advertising.  Go to the following link, enter 27560 as the zip, and then check off the box for 3G coverage.  Looks like they are saying great coverage, but I wonder if that is really the case.<br><br><a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/coverageviewer/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wireless.att.com/coverageviewer/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[michaelbushnell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is tailor made for the subdivisions on the outskirts of Raleigh ("fringe areas"), not for folks living in downtown.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Their coverage map shows strong 3G signal even past Apex and Chapel Hill, not just in downtown.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[michaelbushnell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[The box is for inside use within a 300 ft radius.  Not to cover large swaths of land.  What are you talking about?  It's not AT&T's fault you don't get signal penetration inside a cinder-block high-rise, or your basement TV room.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Sonne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 2:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is meant for people who cannot get signal inside their homes.  I used to not be able to get signal within one room in my house for any carrier (t-mobile, verizon, alltel, sprint, and At&t) but the moment i stepped outside I had full bars on my iphone and everything was blazing fast, thus it wasn't their networy but something in my house that blocked signals.  This unit is designed to work within your house to prevent those dead zones usually caused by certain building materials, metal roofs, etc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rcberg3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I mentioned this but did not reply to the specific post. In this area, the 3G coverage map is way optimistic leaving lots of bad areas that show up as nice dark blue anyway.<br><br>Also, if you look, the 3g signal drops off very quickly west of RTP where there are lots of houses being built in teh last couple of years and thousands more planned for the future at the edge of Cary. Looking at coverage maps all over the US, this is pretty common for ATTs network as they are playing catch-up, so this should help many people in the burbs]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2009 11:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm still wondering how ISPs like Comcast will react to this, and what about bandwidth caps? Plus a lot of DSL lines don't have a fast upstream speed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pika2000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wait a sec... they are charging me to use my own bandwidth to make calls?<br><br>Why cant they just do voip over my wifi network and roam off their network?<br><br>Or better yet, another reason to stick to google voice... one universal number to ring my cell and my voip phones. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gerrynjr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, they're not charging you to use your broadband.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Sonne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can someone clarify the target user of this device? It is simply for people who want to cut the landline but whose homes are located in bad cell reception areas? Or is the idea that you could relinquish all landlines and use this for your 'net connection?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Captain Drew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ha, given just how much carriers hate tethering, I'd guess the former.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[You need an internet connection for this device to function.<br><br>The idea is to fill in signal deficits inside a structure.  The unlimited calling plan (priced at $20/month, below the monthly cost of a landline) would functionally replace a home landline phone if you so choose.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Sonne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 2:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Many people get calls and text messages on their cell phones, even when they are home. Having crap coverage there makes that a pain.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[liuping]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[This thing is a POS.  I picked one up last week in Charlotte because my phone wouldn't work inside, but worked fine outside.  Now my phone works inside, but not outside.  The phone won't switch back to 3G from Microcell quick enough, so when I am outside, I have the same problem I use to have inside!!!<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anish Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[   Femtocell is a good idea for US market where cell towers have height limits and frequencies are higher than in Europe (meaning worse penetration through walls).<br>   And folks, stop complaining about AT&T. Other carriers are not any better. AT&T IP network might have problems because it was overloaded with iPhone customers using internet, but everything else works just fine. At my previous work at huge company we received about 1k phones via company order. Guess what? Cell serving our campus went down instantly. AT&T built new cell in 2 days!<br>   All carriers once in a while have problems with SMS delivery. In fact, GSM phone users on AT&T and T-Mobile are using SMS messages 10 times more often than CDMA users. As for drop calls and no coverage. I have a Verizon phone as well, that's the same peace of pie. My friend was constantly complaining about quality of calls over AT&T and in a year after he bought the phone he finally discovered that he had faulty 3d party software that was lagging the phone! Once he uninstalled it, voice quality improved drastically as well as battery life. People tend to blame service and somebody else, but not themselves. If they spent few minutes to investigate and troubleshoot the issue, complaints would abate.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alex904]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 2:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@alex904 : I talk to enough people on ATT phones to know that their garbled voices are due to them having a bad voice network too. It aint just their data.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[reuthermonkey1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 3:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cool technology, but way to pricey.  IMO the upfront costs need to be sub-$100 without any monthly fees to make sense.  I don't see why anyone would pay additional money to use an iPhone, Blackberry, etc.  If they want my business they need to provide good coverage at work AND at home.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheeDr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Even if this made a phone go from 3 or 4 bars to Full bars of connection, that'll be better for calls, battery life, internet speed, etc.<br><br>What about radiation?<br>Will we need to wear tin foil hats?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[miko34]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't get it...shouldn't these be free or heavily subsidsed????<br><br>it's 3G right so I have to buy a separate device so I can get something that should work out of the box.....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[raaaaaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Darren,<br><br>Any word if the rebate for DSL customers also applies to U-Verse customers?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've got a request in with AT&T, waiting on an answer for this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just heard back & updated -- no rebate for U-verse users. Sucks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Okay, just re-heard back. U-verse customers are too eligible for the extra $50 rebate, but it applies to "new customers only." So it sounds like existing U-verse / DSL customers are out to dry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 3:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why not just get a wifi phone?  A little Google Voice and a phone which switches from GSM to WiFi and this is unneeded....unless you are some sort of iPhone addict.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Yusuf Al-Kindi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2009 6:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Enough with this soft launch stuff.  Release the darn thing already.  And why is the FCC so concerned with this mirocell?  Did they worry as much with the other companies and their E911 capabilities?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bryanapa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 1:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/atandt-3g-microcell-unboxing-and-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes ... yes they did.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Sonne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2009 2:29PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
