<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[What a boring logo to be so mass produced.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimminy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 6:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's actually not bad at all. What's boring are the Windows 7 software boxes, specifically the font.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Down]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 7:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who gives a dam about the bleedin' logo?<br>Personally when evaluating an OS I look at other kinds of details.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plexus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 7:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[They needed to keep it simple.  Remember what happened with Vista when consumers were shown two different logos with more than one word on them?  They sued.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leindurstit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 7:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[A good logo is about easy recognition, not good looks or taste.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loocas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 7:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[You're the only one, WinDULL.  You're the only one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 8:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Woah, sorry guys.<br>Don't get me wrong. I can't wait for Win7, I just thought seeing as this is going onto such a massive amount of computers, they would put maybe a little more jazz into it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimminy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 8:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[jimminy @<br><br>No massive at all.  The last survey I saw indicates most businesses sticking with XP.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fud09]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 8:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fud<br>Yeah good point. About three people the the world will buy win7 computers.<br>The only use for a computer is obviously business.<br><br>/sarcasm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimminy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 8:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fud09: The last survey you read was wrong, then.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[APaps]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[MS wasn't sued  because the design logo but because they cheated to say that a device is "vista capable" when it wasn't.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Magallanes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 9:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Haha, WinDULL?  It's all about the WinDoze! ;)<br><br>Also, 6,000 "Certified" apps and peripherals on x64 Win7 3 weeks before release is not that bad.  Many more run than that you just won't see the logo catching on yet.<br><br>I enjoy bashing M$ with the best of them, but for this?  They are doing pretty good here, I think.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Fij]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2009 9:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Magallanes: But that's the thing - the computers were perfectly capable of running Windows Vista; they just weren't capable of displaying Aero Glass.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MarkKB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2009 6:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's simple and serves its function, nothing much else to it besides that. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Absolute92]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 7:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Certified, schmertified, been running it since the beta on my Dell Mini 9 like it was the OS this netbook was MADE to run.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 7:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Exactly!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10minutehobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 9:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Programs like this are for consumers who are now too lazy to research or too confused by technology to be able to discern whether or not their machine works is "Windows 7 Compatible".  Netbooks are ABSOLUTELY compatible with Win7, even Z520s with 1GB of memory.  Fast?  Not so much.  Do they install, and boot, and run?  Yes, why yes they do.<br><br>Think about it.  The Vista Compatible label is essentially the cornerstone in Vista's commercial failure (don't give me shit, I loved Vista once SP1 came around and I still use it at work and at home; just saying commercially here), and given MS's apparent kick in the pants as of late, I'd be really surprised if this turned into lightning striking twice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Level 5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 7:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm pretty sure Windows haz a win on their hands]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ethos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 7:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh absolutely, I'm not doubting that.  This is the my favorite version of Windows since Win2k.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Level 5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 7:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[I ran into problems when I tried upgrading a emachines t3516 (upgraded to 2gb ram and a Nvidia 8600gt gpu) with a "compatible for Vista" logo on it. Turns out that "compatible" part meant that I had to flash my motherboard bios, of which there were to to choose from with no easy way to know which board was actually in your machine with same model number. I did eventually get Vista running, after about a week of trial and error with too many BSODs to count. Then about a year later I decided to put OS X on it, it took a couple hours and actually work very well on it`s 3.2 ghz Celeron D. This weekend it shall be reborn once more as a Windows Home Server box, hopefully. So the moral to the story is there certification program is a joke if you can upgrade a certified machine to OS X more easily than Windows.<br>BTW 7 doesn`t run on it either, nothing with a vista based kernel does, hopefully home server is running something else at heart or I gonna play with penguins again.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pknyo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 9:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[WHS runs on a server 2003 install. aka, the XP-era kernel.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt G]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2009 10:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Works for me. Though I wonder if they'll provide stores with OEM to upgrade a lot of the Vista Machines as they'll be dated stock and really, Who is going to buy a older(even if its only a week or two) and slower(7 is faster =]) laptop/PC when Windows7 is right next to it?<br><br>I've been running Win7 since before July I think? and it's been a awesome experience and will absolutely recommend Win7 to anyone]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ethos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 7:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if Windows 7 will come with its own set of viruses and crash all the time like every other windows product.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[macjonny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 8:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think my computer must be broken... I'm running Windows Vista, and have never had it crash or had a virus... can someone tell me what's wrong?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Epsilon-Not]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 8:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah just like your Mac came with black thick rimed glasses, a smug leftist point of view, and your ability to create "art" in photoshop.<br><br>Oh whats that you were already a frail metro asshole, and you still suck at photoshop?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pknyo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 9:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[@pknyo<br><br>+1]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Azlo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 11:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Epsilon<br><br>The answer is that you are actually using a Mac. The thing is Windows has copied so many things from OS X that it is increasingly difficult to visually tell the difference between the two. It's only when you use a Windows PC that you'll begin seeing the difference as it starts to crash and get filled with spyware and viruses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FoxKenji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 11:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ pknyo<br><br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_X5uR7VC4M" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_X5uR7VC4M</a><br><br>you shrimpy, panty-wearing transvestite PC user.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FoxKenji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 12:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fox<br><br>Actually it's quite easy.  Windows is the one with all the good software.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Anderson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 12:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[@FoxKenji: Huh, I wonder why Apple put the Dell logo on the case, seems kind of odd of them. I have to say, I'm impressed at how OS X must now be compatible with applications I've used since Windows 95. (Seems to have come at the cost of being unable to run any Mac applications)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Epsilon-Not]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 12:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hi Ccflores!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 8:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really wish they'd get into the habit of putting stickers UNDERNEATH the bloody computer where I can look at them if I need to feel reassured but beyond that are never seen.  When I buy a computer I know what is inside it (that's what the specification is for) and I don't need stickers littering up the thing like the inside of a school locker.  Sure, I could peal them off but, dammit, why should I even have to?<br><br>Sorry, personal whinge...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelmon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 8:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was always curious to know how you would get these stickers. I'm using the RC version of 7. I'm getting a copy of 7 for volunteering that hosting party (don't expect much to show up =< ). Will a sticker come in the box, or do I have to get it from somewhere? I really want one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darbear5610]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 9:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey what all you had to do I tried and they said Not a Finalist to me ;-(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Williams]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish they would only be on the computer's box and not the computer itself.  Yes, I know MOST of them can be successfully removed, but it is lame that I have to take the time and effort to stop their free advertising.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 9:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[My EeePC 1000HE runs Win 7 Pro with aero very well, thank you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TRAFFICBLOWS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 10:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can it play h264]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fred]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 10:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, it's a bit more attractive than the goddamned silver XP stickers. I do wish they would try harder to coordinate with the intel stickers and the GPU stickers. This sticker ecosystem needs better standards.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 11:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[I tear them all off.<br><br><br>I don't get people, you take the sticker off your pants when you buy them, right? So why do you keep the Windows and Nvidia stickers on your computers?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Isn't it ironic that with Vista, Microsoft was putting Vista compatibility stickers on machines that didn't have enough power to run the OS.<br><br>Now, with Windows 7, netbooks run the OS fine, but Microsoft is balking because of the lesser revenue they'll get from it.<br><br>Microsoft Compatibility Certification: A certified SCAM]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[louden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 11:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Alot of people blame Microsoft when Intel had a hand at it <br><a href="http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2008/03/the-vista-capable-debacle-intel-pushes-microsoft-bends.ars" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2008/03/the-vista-capable-debacle-intel-pushes-microsoft-bends.ars</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Williams]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Adrian: So Intel and Microsoft weren't on the same page.  That means Microsoft was not at fault?  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[louden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 11:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[That new blue gradient background in the logo is also featured in Window 7's new Blue Screen of Death.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FoxKenji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 11:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now see, you got me all hopeful and after a quick google search I see you're just trolling. The BSOD looks exactly the same with windows 7 albeit with different wording.<br><br>For shame.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 12:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOLz]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FoxKenji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have Win7 RC1 running on my Asus netbook, Asus laptop, Core 2 quad desktop and wife's Toshiba laptop. All without a hitch. A sticker means nothing.Anyone with a partial brain can figure out most Windows problems anyway unless a hardware manufacturer doesn't offer a compatible driver. Most people only bitch about Windows because of their own lack of knowledge or laziness.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NOCknock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[This logo is for programs and add-on devices.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Raffi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 2:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Microsoft finally straightened out their stickers, to a degree.<br><br>With Vista, the stickers meant that the computer could run SOME version of Vista at least minimally, and possibly after some firmware update that was not yet available.<br><br>Win WIn7, the stickers mean that the computer can run ANY version of Win7.<br><br>The problem is that the new stickers require a computer to be able to run all hardware versions of Windows, not just all feature versions of Windows. That is, just because the computer can run Windows Ultimate doesn't mean it can get a sticker. It has to be able to run Windows Ultimate 64-bit. That leaves out a lot of equipment, most notably netbooks that, in general, cannot use 64-bit processors, regardless of how much you max out the other specs.<br><br>It will help on the accessory and software ends though. It means that when I get a new TV tuner that has a Compatible logo, it will work with my Windows 64-bit edition and will not have a asterisk - "* Requires a 32-bit version". (I'm looking at you, Pinnacle...)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 2:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[And NeatCo, with their Neat Receipts. That also was 32-bit only when I got it. I looked online before buying it, and NeatCo said that they would have soon an update for 64-bit. But when they did, they wanted to charge another $30 for it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2009 2:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Windows 7 logo program already 6,000-strong with products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/30/windows-7-logo-program-is-6-000-strong-leaves-most-atom-netbook/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too many stickers. My palmrests look like fruit salad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jjigen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2009 6:19AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
